Hot teacher in trouble. This time for giving out drugs.

General » General Discussion

Site Notices

TNVC Partners With Envision Technology - MARS Rangefinder Family, MARS-Lc!

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Hot teacher in trouble. This time for giving out drugs.

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:04:39 PM EDT

http://www.wxii12.com/r/30809382/detail.html

I missed so much growing up.

ETA: We need a new acronym around here. HTiT = Hawt Teacher in Trouble

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:09:35 PM EDT

[#1]

She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:11:29 PM EDT

[#2]

not guilty

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:12:31 PM EDT

[#3]

Quoted:
not guilty

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:19:16 PM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:21:57 PM EDT

[#5]

Hmmm. Not sure on this one. It is established ARFCOM law that attractive female teachers cannot be convicted of sexual crimes against underage male students because of the long standing principle of "If You Would Hit, You Must Acquit" that comes down from Natural Law, the Magna Carta and Hammurabi.

Does said protection that derives from Hawtness apply to drugs?
The ARFCOM Supreme Court of Law (ARF-SCOFLAW) may have to rule.
Aimless, Nolocontendere et. al. will have to render judgement.

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:22:00 PM EDT

[#6]

HahAhahAhHAHah!!

Dumb bitch!

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:22:20 PM EDT

[#7]

No excuse for that...guilty.

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:24:50 PM EDT

[#8]

based on all the evidence, and lack of bj, def guilty.....

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:27:19 PM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

You call that "moderately" attractive?

She's a very attractive woman, especially if you factor in that mugshots automatically deduct 1/10 beauty points.

I give her an 8/10 easily. Maybe higher.

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:30:52 PM EDT

[#10]

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:32:00 PM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

You call that "moderately" attractive?

She's a very attractive woman, especially if you factor in that mugshots automatically deduct 1/10 beauty points.

I give her an 8/10 easily. Maybe higher.

She would be hot as hell if I'm a 9th grader watching her strut around the classroom in heels and a skirt

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:34:25 PM EDT

[#12]

Gastonia.....
Not surprised.

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:38:10 PM EDT

[#13]

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:52:03 PM EDT

[#14]

Fucking English teachers.

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:57:10 PM EDT

[#15]

Not guilty.

I want to party with her.

Posted: 3/31/2012 4:59:46 PM EDT

[#16]

guilty on a misdemeanor charge

just not quite hawt enough

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:03:38 PM EDT

[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:
She's more of a MAtit Moderately Attractive Teacher in Trouble

Case dismissed on a technicality. Lol

You call that "moderately" attractive?

She's a very attractive woman, especially if you factor in that mugshots automatically deduct 1/10 beauty points.

I give her an 8/10 easily. Maybe higher.

Sorry, I live too close to the Gulf of Mexico so I can't have a windowless basement. I also see smoking hot 20 somethings all day every day. I stand by my solid 6 assessment. If I were a kid in her class than easily an 8 when you factor in hormones.

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:03:38 PM EDT

[#18]

Economics class

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:10:41 PM EDT

[#19]

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:23:51 PM EDT

[#20]

Quoted:

No excuse for that...guilty.

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:26:09 PM EDT

[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:

No excuse for that...guilty.

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:43:48 PM EDT

[#22]

Quoted:

Hmmm. Not sure on this one. It is established ARFCOM law that attractive female teachers cannot be convicted of sexual crimes against underage male students because of the long standing principle of "If You Would Hit, You Must Acquit" that comes down from Natural Law, the Magna Carta and Hammurabi.

Does said protection that derives from Hawtness apply to drugs?

The ARFCOM Supreme Court of Law (ARF-SCOFLAW) may have to rule.

Aimless, Nolocontendere et. al. will have to render judgement.

I'd argue that ARFCOM law applies here due to Locke's Hookers and Blow principle.

Not Guilty.

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:48:36 PM EDT

[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Hmmm. Not sure on this one. It is established ARFCOM law that attractive female teachers cannot be convicted of sexual crimes against underage male students because of the long standing principle of "If You Would Hit, You Must Acquit" that comes down from Natural Law, the Magna Carta and Hammurabi.
Does said protection that derives from Hawtness apply to drugs?
The ARFCOM Supreme Court of Law (ARF-SCOFLAW) may have to rule.
Aimless, Nolocontendere et. al. will have to render judgement.

I'd argue that ARFCOM law applies here due to Locke's Hookers and Blow principle.

Not Guilty.

And the Cochran Conclusion:

If you'd hit it, you must acquit it.

Posted: 3/31/2012 5:50:49 PM EDT

[#24]

WTF is wrong with these people? Where is their sense of responsibility regarding proper authority of children? All of these "teachers gone bad" is getting out of control.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Hot teacher in trouble. This time for giving out drugs.

General » General Discussion

Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us