Quoted:
I'm wondering about the jury's verdict. Did they actually believe the faggots story? Or was the $1 award their way of showing contempt for the case?
I hope the lawyers got their 33% of the award money.
Personally I find it hard to believe that retail employees would go out of their way to insult their customers. It's hard enough to get them to help their customers! >gg<
View Quote
Its a finding of guilt since it is unlikely for an overturn and the award is DEFINATELY contempt for the case. A de minimus award only says that a wrong was committed, but it isn't worth any money.
Does anyone think for a minute that if these fags groped a child that Toys R Us would have been liable for not "flagging" these characters and kicking them out?
I'm sorry to hear that TRU will have to pay the $3 award!