User Panel
Posted: 8/1/2011 7:33:36 PM EDT
Cops and the First Amendment
News Source at: http://www.longislandpress.com/2011/07/30/suffolk-cops-arrest-tv-cameraman-at-crime-scene-video/ UPDATE - ETA- Time to turn up the heat to get Officer Facist Fired so his like minded supporters will get the message and curtail their Anti-Rights Behavior See Page 2 for updated Article on this matter |
|
At least the officers went home safe that night, that's what counts.
|
|
Wow. My gut reaction is both unreasonable and irrational, but that's how I usually react to obvious violations of fundamental rights. Just, wow.
ETA: The cops I know would never do something like this. In fact, I can think of one who'd probably prevent something like from happening if he saw it starting. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Officer ought to be shit canned IMPRISONED. Then personally sued |
|
I hope Sgt Dickface and his departement are sued for violation of 1st Amendment - freedom of the press.
|
|
I'd say something nasty...but why bother? The filmed Cop's actions and words speak for volumes for his opinion on what kind of country HE THINKS America is.
|
|
Need to hear the other side of the story first
None of you were there There could have been a gun in the camera Could have been a terrorist filming police response Uniform is copyrighted and can't be filmed Etc Did I forget anything? |
|
Suffolk County police confirmed that Datz was arrested and said he was charged with obstruction of governmental administration He is obviously guilty, as evidenced by the video. The officer was distracted from the scene by having to arrest him. Had Datz not been there, the officer would not have been interrupted in the performance of his official duties. Right? |
|
How many isolated incidents does it take to create a patten of abuse?
|
|
A quote from Blade Runner comes to mind: "If you're not cop, you're little people."
|
|
Quoted:
How many isolated incidents does it take to create a patten of abuse? i don't know about you but there are hundreds of thousands of police officers across the entire US. Who spend 10 hours days doing their jobs just fine. You're so called logic would be similar to those who hate the military as a bunch of child killers. |
|
Quoted: Need to hear the other side of the story first None of you were there There could have been a gun in the camera Could have been a terrorist filming police response Uniform is copyrighted and can't be filmed Etc Did I forget anything? Possibly a dog hiding in the camera, biding its time... |
|
Quoted:
Suffolk County police confirmed that Datz was arrested and said he was charged with obstruction of governmental administration
He is obviously guilty, as evidenced by the video. The officer was distracted from the scene by having to arrest him. Had Datz not been there, the officer would not have been interrupted in the performance of his official duties. Right? That charge sounds like something straight out of 1984 |
|
Quoted:
Oh yeah? That is, uh, shocking. Don't worry, it's just an isolated incident. |
|
Quoted:
Suffolk County police confirmed that Datz was arrested and said he was charged with obstruction of governmental administration
He is obviously guilty, as evidenced by the video. The officer was distracted from the scene by having to arrest him. Had Datz not been there, the officer would not have been interrupted in the performance of his official duties. Right? I think you got it. After all, the cop did have to walk an entire block to make the arrest. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Need to hear the other side of the story first None of you were there There could have been a gun in the camera Could have been a terrorist filming police response Uniform is copyrighted and can't be filmed Etc Did I forget anything? Possibly a dog hiding in the camera, biding its time... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Suffolk County police confirmed that Datz was arrested and said he was charged with obstruction of governmental administration
He is obviously guilty, as evidenced by the video. The officer was distracted from the scene by having to arrest him. Had Datz not been there, the officer would not have been interrupted in the performance of his official duties. Right? I think you got it. After all, the cop did have to walk an entire block to make the arrest. He didn't walk that block, he drove. Races up crossing traffic diagonal right up to the guy. Then hops out and takes the camera and arrests the guy. His earlier walking / verbal menstruation must have put him in a lather. The officer (sergeant?) seemed very agitated. Why? Who knows. Not gonna speculate. |
|
And due to this film a few more Americans decide that perhaps the police are not looking out for their best interests.
And next incident more Americans decide the same thing. And at the incident after the previous incident more Americans decide the same thing. And on it goes, with the police loosing the respect of a larger percentage of the American people each day. It may not be the result the police wish, but it is what is happening due to their actions. |
|
It makes you wonder what they were doing to the suspect. Must have been something blatantly illegal to act that badly towards a camera.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
How many isolated incidents does it take to create a patten of abuse? i don't know about you but there are hundreds of thousands of police officers across the entire US. Who spend 10 hours days doing their jobs just fine. You're so called logic would be similar to those who hate the military as a bunch of child killers. So I guess the officer will be charged with kidnapping right? How about assault for putting his hands on someone? |
|
Quoted: It makes you wonder what they were doing to the suspect. Must have been something blatantly illegal to act that badly towards a camera. Thats what many of us are thinking. |
|
Quoted: Need to hear the other side of the story first None of you were there There could have been a gun in the camera Could have been a terrorist filming police response Uniform is copyrighted and can't be filmed Etc Did I forget anything? His mom forgot to cut the crust off of his sandwich and he was Mr. Grumpypants because of it. |
|
|
Quoted: I hope Sgt Dickface and his departement are sued for violation of 1st Amendment - freedom of the press. What does it matter the Tax payers are the ones who are going to foot the bill either by more taxes or revenue by fines and tickets. It is a cycle where the citizen is the biggest looser. |
|
Quoted:
Wow. My gut reaction is both unreasonable and irrational, but that's how I usually react to obvious violations of fundamental rights. Just, wow. ETA: The cops I know would never do something like this. In fact, I can think of one who'd probably prevent something like from happening if he saw it starting. You can only think of one that might stop another from commiting a crime and you think that is a good thing? |
|
Quoted: A Tragedy of the Commons, of sorts. Quoted: I hope Sgt Dickface and his departement are sued for violation of 1st Amendment - freedom of the press. What does it matter the Tax payers are the ones who are going to foot the bill either by more taxes or revenue by fines and tickets. It is a cycle where the citizen is the biggest looser. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
How many isolated incidents does it take to create a patten of abuse? i don't know about you but there are hundreds of thousands of police officers across the entire US. Who spend 10 hours days doing their jobs just fine. You're so called logic would be similar to those who hate the military as a bunch of child killers. There were hundreds of thousands of KKK members during it's height, of who a relatively small number committed lynching, killings and other crimes. By your logic because the number of crimes committed by the KKK were relatively small compared to their total membership, the KKK was never a problem and never should have been dealt with. |
|
citizans get arrested everyday for filming the police. The problem here is the guy works for a news company which is the Catch 22 in these filming cases. Police use anti wire tapping laws to make arrest against people filming them. When a person works for a news company these laws do not apply as they do for normal Joe Blow with a camera
My thoughts on all of this is the police across the country have been told to not allow themselves to be filmed, and arrest anyone who does film them. My question is why care if your being filmed if your not doing anything wrong?
|
|
Am I in before the arfcops tell us that the police like and welcome videotaping?
|
|
Quoted: My question is why care if your being filmed if your not doing anything wrong? Funny how when the tables are turned, you get a whole different result. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.