Finally got a response from Drew Hansen.
" I’m sorry this took me forever. I voted for HB1143 (10-day waiting periods & safety training), HB1240 (assault weapons ban), and SB5078 (liability for violations of consumer protection laws). Washington State firearms laws are (of course) subject to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen; I do think these are consistent with the Second Amendment (as Bruen interpreted it) and federal law. The final version of HB1143 didn’t have a permit to purchase but had a 10-day waiting period and training requirements, which should be constitutional (the Kavanaugh concurrence in Bruen explicitly notes that many states’ “shall-issue” regimes “may require a license applicant to undergo fingerprinting, a background check, a mental health records check, and training in firearms handling and in laws regarding the use of force.”); HB1240 was the ban on new sales of AR-15s and similar weapons, which also should be constitutional (the Alito concurrence says that Bruen “decides nothing about who may lawfully possess a firearm or the requirements that must be met to buy a gun” nor (most important to HB1240) anything about “the kinds of weapons that people may possess”). SB5078 does the type of consumer protection provisions that the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) permits, namely, state laws applicable to the sale/marketing of firearms.
Anyways, thanks for writing – I hope that this is helpful whether we agree or disagree, and I again apologize that it took me forever to respond - Drew"
FUCK THAT GUY