Posted: 1/2/2016 11:17:34 PM EDT
| Anyone have any negative experience with this gun? Hickok45 and Mr gunsngear seem to love it! I'm a big Glock guy but been looking at other flavors to carry and experiment with! Also do the FNS series have a good reputation as being reliable? |
| When I got my first handgun I tried out several. The sigs were nice but a tad out of my price range at the time and I hated the 3 glocks I tried (shun the non believer). So it was a toss up between the fns9 and them m&p shield. I chose the fns9 because of the safety and ambi controls (lefty shooter). Shot over 1500 rounds out of it in the last year and had one casing somehow get stuck on its way out. Otherwise it banged every time all 1500 rounds of the cheapest shit I could get that was brass cased. when I get comfortable enough to CC I'm going to get the compact version without hesitation. I really don't think you can go wrong the the FNS9 |
| If there's one thing I can say as someone who has owned an fnp-45tac and a fns9c, go with the sig if you value aftermarket. Holsters, sights, it's all a battle to find stuff with fn. Also, the sig 320 is what I'll be buying to replace my fns9c - after I shot one, knew I'd own one. |
|
Quoted: I like the FNS but according to many gunsmiths and Apex they are really complicated with some weird designs internally. Alex said the fire control group is too weird to make trigger parts for it. I still like them but something to consider. |