Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
Posted: 10/4/2002 10:52:16 PM EDT
If a person hypothetically happened to own a SAR1 and then hypothetically got one of those K-var Bulgarian AK74s, and realized that the strange doohickey on the trigger and other strange part were no doubt for select-fire, which is illegal and morally wrong, would one hypothetically be in legal trouble? Would those hypothetical parts be enough in the you-know-who's eyes to constitute intent to have a hypothetical illegal machinegun?

If so, what would one hypothetically do?

Thanks!
Link Posted: 10/5/2002 4:12:52 AM EDT
Link Posted: 10/5/2002 5:02:21 AM EDT
Link Posted: 10/5/2002 1:46:21 PM EDT
Thanks.
Link Posted: 10/5/2002 2:21:22 PM EDT
It gets weird. AR FCG and carriers can be dropped in by hand and you are in trouble (and the Tapco mailer says FFL rules apply for these). FAL kits come with the FA receiver cut and it is OK because nobody expects you to do the very hard work of swapping ejector blocks to transfer one with the FA sear to you new FAL upper receiver. But I have never heard of AK FA parts being installed without the 3rd hole/pin, which is easily seen from several feet away.
Link Posted: 10/6/2002 7:30:42 PM EDT
Well, I asked in the legal section and someone other than Steve in Va answered.

I didn't realize the bolt carrier had a 'bad' part on it along with the selector.

He suggested I sell the 'bad' parts. Any idea what to ask for?

Thanks again!
Link Posted: 10/7/2002 3:45:19 AM EDT
Top Top