Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 1/31/2006 6:57:36 AM EDT
You wouldn't here something like that out of Hannity or Limbaugh
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 6:58:58 AM EDT
Do we get cool Che knockoff T-shirts with Neal Boortz on them?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:05:17 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:08:34 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Triumph955i:
Do we get cool Che knockoff T-shirts with Neal Boortz on them?



+1
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:10:03 AM EDT
So what prompted him to call for a revolution?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:10:24 AM EDT
With so many capitalists making money off of Che shirts, he's spinning in his grave. I hear he's making a record 2,000 revolutions a minute.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:14:09 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:
With so many capitalists making money off of Che shirts, he's spinning in his grave. I hear he's making a record 2,000 revolutions a minute.



Then someone ram a dynamo up his asshole and make his ass worth something for once.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:14:56 AM EDT
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:22:12 AM EDT

Originally Posted By SubnetMask:
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?



The whole "revolution" thing comes into perspective when you realize that the vast majority of libertarians are liberals who have seen the light but still want to do drugs.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:22:55 AM EDT
Who?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:24:33 AM EDT

Originally Posted By motown_steve:
Who?


Neal Boortz
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:24:38 AM EDT

Originally Posted By motown_steve:
Who?



boortz.com/
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:26:36 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:

Originally Posted By SubnetMask:
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?



The whole "revolution" thing comes into perspective when you realize that the vast majority of libertarians are liberals who have seen the light but still want to do drugs.



You say that like its a bad thing.


Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution. The party could have made some waves by grabbing onto and using the eminent domain issue as a cornerstone, but they missed the boat on that one.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:28:30 AM EDT

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:
Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution.



That and the open borders thing, and the allowing the military to unionize, and the whole "9-11 is our fault" thing, and the isolationist foreign policy thing, and the fact they keep nominating TOTAL FUCKING NUTCASES for their presidential candidates...
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:28:35 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/31/2006 7:29:18 AM EDT by VTHOKIESHOOTER]

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:

Originally Posted By SubnetMask:
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?



The whole "revolution" thing comes into perspective when you realize that the vast majority of libertarians are liberals who have seen the light but still want to do drugs.



You say that like its a bad thing.


Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution. The party could have made some waves by grabbing onto and using the eminent domain issue as a cornerstone, but they missed the boat on that one.



FYI while Neal is a libertarian and his for legalization of drugs, he IS NOT pro-drugs AND he is on the outs with the Libertarian party for their idiotic approach to national security and border issues.

Neal is as pissed off with the political parties as we are.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:31:00 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Admiral_Crunch:
So what prompted him to call for a revolution?



+1 Is this somehow related to tax filing season?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:32:17 AM EDT
Funny, the guys that don't want people to own guns call for revolution.


What does blood bath mean?

Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:33:16 AM EDT
In.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:34:36 AM EDT

Originally Posted By kill-9:

Originally Posted By Admiral_Crunch:
So what prompted him to call for a revolution?



+1 Is this somehow related to tax filing season?



Pretty much but it centers around the State of the Union address and Bush's and the Republican's party lack of leadership when it comes to shutting down the border, tax reform, spending reform and the lack of economic education that so many people have.

He wants to take the country back from the socialists.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 12:06:02 PM EDT

Originally Posted By VTHOKIESHOOTER:

Originally Posted By kill-9:

Originally Posted By Admiral_Crunch:
So what prompted him to call for a revolution?



+1 Is this somehow related to tax filing season?



Pretty much but it centers around the State of the Union address and Bush's and the Republican's party lack of leadership when it comes to shutting down the border, tax reform, spending reform and the lack of economic education that so many people have.

He wants to take the country back from the socialists.



Ah, OK, thanks for the details.

Good luck taking the country back from the Socialists. As long as both parties agree that state-sponsored altruism is just and proper, things will only improve by small degrees, if at all.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 12:08:38 PM EDT
I've been saying it for years.

KAPITALISTOSKAYA REVOLYUTSIYA!
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 1:19:36 PM EDT
I use to listen to him but his runaway rants on supporting the homosexual agenda made me tune him out. I now listen to Mike Gallagher instead. He is like Bortz but without the pro drug/ pro homosexual thing.

The thing that he said that was the last straw for me was that he had proof that anyone who was against homosexuals or was discusted by their behavior/agenda was really a homosexual themselves! Not very logical.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 5:02:28 PM EDT

Originally Posted By VTHOKIESHOOTER:
You wouldn't here something like that out of Hannity or Limbaugh




Probably because they know how to spell "h-e-a-r", I bet????????????
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 5:04:00 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:

Originally Posted By SubnetMask:
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?



The whole "revolution" thing comes into perspective when you realize that the vast majority of libertarians are liberals who have seen the light but still want to do drugs.



I think you don't understand libertarianism.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 5:04:01 PM EDT

Originally Posted By BobCole:

Originally Posted By VTHOKIESHOOTER:
You wouldn't here something like that out of Hannity or Limbaugh




Probably because they know how to spell "h-e-a-r", I bet????????????

Was typing fast- I know the difference
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 5:08:19 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:

Originally Posted By SubnetMask:
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?



The whole "revolution" thing comes into perspective when you realize that the vast majority of libertarians are liberals who have seen the light but still want to do drugs.



Not for me....never touched one....don't plan too....

Libertarians just want people to have the choice of doing them or not.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 5:09:57 PM EDT
Im in!
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:25:03 PM EDT

Originally Posted By SubnetMask:
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?



Ron Paul,anyone?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:26:26 PM EDT

Originally Posted By RikWriter:

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:
Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution.



That and the open borders thing, and the allowing the military to unionize, and the whole "9-11 is our fault" thing, and the isolationist foreign policy thing, and the fact they keep nominating TOTAL FUCKING NUTCASES for their presidential candidates...

But other than that, they're a real viable party...

And I'm a small "L" libertarian.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:26:39 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/31/2006 7:28:07 PM EDT by bulldog1967]

Originally Posted By RikWriter:

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:
Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution.



That and the open borders thing, and the allowing the military to unionize, and the whole "9-11 is our fault" thing, and the isolationist foreign policy thing, and the fact they keep nominating TOTAL FUCKING NUTCASES for their presidential candidates...



Not ALL libertarians are like that....

I'm not, and voted for GWB TWICE.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:31:35 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/31/2006 7:34:39 PM EDT by RikWriter]

Originally Posted By bulldog1967:

Originally Posted By RikWriter:

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:
Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution.



That and the open borders thing, and the allowing the military to unionize, and the whole "9-11 is our fault" thing, and the isolationist foreign policy thing, and the fact they keep nominating TOTAL FUCKING NUTCASES for their presidential candidates...



Not ALL libertarians are like that....

I'm not, and voted for GWB TWICE.



I didn't mean that all libertarians were like that...I was speaking of the issues holding back the organized party. Libertarians with a small "L" have a good philosophy and I agree with them about many economic and social issues.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:33:59 PM EDT

Originally Posted By RikWriter:

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:
Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution.



That and the open borders thing, and the allowing the military to unionize, and the whole "9-11 is our fault" thing, and the isolationist foreign policy thing, and the fact they keep nominating TOTAL FUCKING NUTCASES for their presidential candidates...



Rik, those positions may stem from their fondness for drugs
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:35:11 PM EDT

Originally Posted By motown_steve:
Who?



www.vicioussob.com
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 7:54:35 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/31/2006 7:56:35 PM EDT by drjarhead]

Originally Posted By kill-9:



Good luck taking the country back from the Socialists.



Taking the country from socialists would be a piece of cake. Problem is those who work for them and are so addicted to their sliver of power over the rest of us that they will do anything to hang on to it. Those are the ones you would have to worry about and some of them are right here on this board.

The fact is, many of them know where their power comes from and it is not from the President or the Constitution but from the socialists who gain their power by using the hard earned money of the rest of us to buy votes from the undeserved and then give some small amount of that power to neofascist dolts who live to exert power over others, no matter how petty it is. It is a symbiotic relationship and both parties know what is at stake for them.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 8:05:41 PM EDT
Never heard of him.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 8:08:56 PM EDT
if the revolution doest start by the time I turn 45, I might just start it my damn self
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 8:33:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/31/2006 9:13:09 PM EDT by RockHard13F]

Originally Posted By TheRedHorseman:
if the revolution doest start by the time I turn 45, I might just start it my damn self



Could you please post your age? I would like to know how much longer I have to prepare.

-Ben

Link Posted: 1/31/2006 9:27:57 PM EDT

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:
Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution. The party could have made some waves by grabbing onto and using the eminent domain issue as a cornerstone, but they missed the boat on that one.



You need to be educated on the facts here, it's not the libertarians views on drugs and prostituting holding us back, it is the regurgitate Christian fundamentalist whack-job views of the dogmatic, and pathetic public that can't make a decision that Fox news didn’t give them.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 9:34:12 PM EDT

Originally Posted By RikWriter:
That and the open borders thing, and the allowing the military to unionize, and the whole "9-11 is our fault" thing, and the isolationist foreign policy thing, and the fact they keep nominating TOTAL FUCKING NUTCASES for their presidential candidates...



FlickTwitter; what exactly do you think you are doing other than supporting those of us who understands facts regarding 9/11 by saying 'isolationist foreigh policy thingamagig', as being a bad thing?

However, based on your comments about Badnarik, who is a wonderful man I met at a Libertarian meeting, I need you to help me make sure he is not, in fact, and idiot... because it really does take one to know one and I hope to allow you to earn your keep.

Who else is stupid, we can’t see from up here?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 9:43:20 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/31/2006 9:45:45 PM EDT by Jorge-Arbusto]

Originally Posted By Yossarian:
Libertarians just want people to have the choice of doing them or not.



In fact; I would say that your average libertarian is VERY conservative, fiscally. The biggest difference between a libertarian and a boot-licking bush apologist republican is IQ. If you take two conservatives, and gave them the same test… the smart one would choose the libertarian; sensible revenue stream from narcotics taxation, protection of our civil liberties, and sensible trade. The not-so-smart one would score republican because of the virus-like, fundamentalist view of the Christian right establishment, and would score authoritarian on the drugs, sex, et al.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 9:46:13 PM EDT
Agree Badnarik was a good candidate.

Didn't hold with most of the wacky extreme policies the LP has adopted.

Ron Paul would be better.

Better yet Ron Paul on the GOP ticket.

Libertarianism has to be looked at in its totality, individual positions may not make sense to you in isolation, but often do when seen as part of a larger method of governance.

Isolationism is a useful word, doesn't really mean anything, certainly nothing accurate, but it sure sounds bad!
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 9:54:51 PM EDT

Originally Posted By K2QB3:
Agree Badnarik was a good candidate.

Didn't hold with most of the wacky extreme policies the LP has adopted.

Ron Paul would be better.

Better yet Ron Paul on the GOP ticket.

Libertarianism has to be looked at in its totality, individual positions may not make sense to you in isolation, but often do when seen as part of a larger method of governance.

Isolationism is a useful word, doesn't really mean anything, certainly nothing accurate, but it sure sounds bad!



+1
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 9:57:23 PM EDT
<--------Libertarian and Political Science student. My leftist teacher loves me.
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 10:03:27 PM EDT

Originally Posted By JIMBEAM:
Funny, the guys that don't want people to own guns call for revolution.


What does blood bath mean?




huh? do you listen to Boortz?
Link Posted: 1/31/2006 10:04:24 PM EDT
True Conservatives needs to work on taking back the republican party instead of fragmenting the system with the lesser of 2 evils bullshit
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 2:58:41 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/1/2006 3:02:56 AM EDT by RikWriter]

Originally Posted By Jorge-Arbusto:

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:
Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution. The party could have made some waves by grabbing onto and using the eminent domain issue as a cornerstone, but they missed the boat on that one.



You need to be educated on the facts here, it's not the libertarians views on drugs and prostituting holding us back, it is the regurgitate Christian fundamentalist whack-job views of the dogmatic, and pathetic public that can't make a decision that Fox news didn’t give them.



Nice to know my initial impression of you was correct.
Hey George, why don't you do a takedown on the Republican Party and fight them on the ground?
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 2:59:39 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Jorge-Arbusto:

Originally Posted By RikWriter:
That and the open borders thing, and the allowing the military to unionize, and the whole "9-11 is our fault" thing, and the isolationist foreign policy thing, and the fact they keep nominating TOTAL FUCKING NUTCASES for their presidential candidates...



FlickTwitter; what exactly do you think you are doing other than supporting those of us who understands facts regarding 9/11 by saying 'isolationist foreigh policy thingamagig', as being a bad thing?

However, based on your comments about Badnarik, who is a wonderful man I met at a Libertarian meeting, I need you to help me make sure he is not, in fact, and idiot... because it really does take one to know one and I hope to allow you to earn your keep.

Who else is stupid, we can’t see from up here?



Take a look in the mirror. All will become clear.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 3:00:55 AM EDT

Originally Posted By K2QB3:
Isolationism is a useful word, doesn't really mean anything, certainly nothing accurate, but it sure sounds bad!



On the contrary, it has a very clear meaning, and it is an accurate description of the foreign policy espoused by the Libertarian Party.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 6:09:06 AM EDT
I think there are a lot of people out there who are fed up with all of the parties. I consider myself a conservative libertarian, not a Republican or a Libertarian. I support a lot of the principles that the Libertarians adobt. However I think the stubling block of the Libertarian party isn't the drug thing (I think most people would agree that we could at least reform some of the drug laws or decriminalize them). I think the biggest one is the issue of open borders and isolationist foreign policy along with their stupid takes on how the military should operate. I think those issues turn Republicans off. Most liberals would love to see the Libertarian foreign policy and open borders but they hate the deregulation and other freedom aspects.

In order for their to be REAL change, the Republican party needs to be taken over by true fiscal conservatives and others who detest a nanny state. The RINO's are the ones who hamstring the party.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 6:36:57 AM EDT

Originally Posted By RikWriter:

Originally Posted By K2QB3:
Isolationism is a useful word, doesn't really mean anything, certainly nothing accurate, but it sure sounds bad!



On the contrary, it has a very clear meaning, and it is an accurate description of the foreign policy espoused by the Libertarian Party.



Isolationism means we fight them on our turf. Which is not a good thing. That idiot Jimmy Carter tried it, and you can look back and see what a rousing success that was.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 6:43:13 AM EDT

Originally Posted By VTHOKIESHOOTER:

Originally Posted By cheaptrickfan:

Originally Posted By Swindle1984:

Originally Posted By SubnetMask:
Well, given that Libertarians can't come close to garnering enough support for even a seat in Congress, I doubt there will be enough support for a "Revolution".

I might be interested, though. Does this involve guns?



The whole "revolution" thing comes into perspective when you realize that the vast majority of libertarians are liberals who have seen the light but still want to do drugs.



You say that like its a bad thing.


Seriously, I believe the two issues holding the libertarian party back is their support of drug use and prostitution. The party could have made some waves by grabbing onto and using the eminent domain issue as a cornerstone, but they missed the boat on that one.



FYI while Neal is a libertarian and his for legalization of drugs, he IS NOT pro-drugs AND he is on the outs with the Libertarian party for their idiotic approach to national security and border issues.

Neal is as pissed off with the political parties as we are.


I wish they'd actually noiminate someone with a snoball's chance in hell, then I could vote for them...
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Top Top