Posted: 10/4/2005 5:42:12 AM EDT
|
Just got this from the NRA-ILA Some companies have been firing employees for having legal firearms locked in their gloveboxes in parking lots or for having hunting firearms in locked in their vehicles. Should you give up your right of self-defense or you right to have a firearm in your vehicle for lawful purposes because anti-gun company administrators have been encouraged by the Brady Campaign to ban firearms in their parking lots? Below is the POLL LINK from the very anti-gun South Florida Sun-Sentinel: Republican lawmakers are proposing a bill that would give Floridians the right to keep guns locked in their vehicles while they're at work -- a practice now banned by many companies. Your opinion? www.nranews.org/UM/T.asp?A2.24.1899.1.4263944 Or copy and paste this url www.sun-sentinel.com/sfl-100305poll,0,7350068,post.poll |
Just because somebody owns property does not mean they can limit your LIBERTY. This is our RIGHT not THIER privilage. What part of "shall not be infringed" is confusing?!?!?!?! |
Hit. 
|
|
Republican lawmakers are proposing a bill that would give Floridians the right to keep guns locked in their vehicles while they're at work -- a practice now banned by many companies. Your opinion? 97.8% I'm in favor it it. Companies should not be allowed to limit workers' constitutional right to bear arms. (6555 responses) 2.2% I'm opposed to it. Allowing people to have guns at work is dangerous. (149 responses) 6704 total responses |
The Bill of Rights, of which the 2nd Amendment is a part, are restrictions placed on the Government. A company can restrict many of the freedoms that government can not. What other part of the United States Constitution is confusing?!?!?!?! |