User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 4:54:54 PM EDT
[#1]
Join progressives so we don't get killed by progressives?
LOL. OP, YOU CRAZY. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 4:59:12 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you'd rather see president Hillary than President Trump? It's a simple question, with a yes or no answer. Keep in mind, I voted for Cruz in the primary. A simple search will find my opinion of Trump as a candidate. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Eating your own and getting in dick measuring contests over who is a "real conservative" (along with pouting afterward) is easier and more productive. Trump isn't our own... So you prefer Hillary then. There's not going to be much difference between them. Both are corrupt big city liberals. You might as well ask me to pick between Sanders and Hillary. So you'd rather see president Hillary than President Trump? It's a simple question, with a yes or no answer. Keep in mind, I voted for Cruz in the primary. A simple search will find my opinion of Trump as a candidate. Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:01:00 PM EDT
[#3]
Asking whether you would vote for Hillary or Trump is like asking whether you would want to lose your left leg or your right leg.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:02:34 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Asking whether you would vote for Hillary or Trump is like asking whether you would want to lose your left leg or your right leg. You never answered the question. All it takes is a yes or no. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:03:16 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You never answered the question. All it takes is a yes or no. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Asking whether you would vote for Hillary or Trump is like asking whether you would want to lose your left leg or your right leg. You never answered the question. All it takes is a yes or no. I answered. 'Yes' and 'No' are not the only answers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:30:21 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
SNIP Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:33:33 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
SNIP Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. A chance is a chance. It's far better than the utter thrashing we'd get in 2020 with Trump. I'm not moping because my guy didn't get in. I'll take any actual Republican other than Bush. Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Paul. I don't care at this point. But not Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:36:56 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A chance is a chance. It's far better than the utter thrashing we'd get in 2020 with Trump. I'm not moping because my guy didn't get in. I'll take any actual Republican other than Bush. Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Paul. I don't care at this point. But not Trump. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SNIP Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. A chance is a chance. It's far better than the utter thrashing we'd get in 2020 with Trump. I'm not moping because my guy didn't get in. I'll take any actual Republican other than Bush. Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Paul. I don't care at this point. But not Trump. Still hoping for Cruz myself but as I said, I'm voting R no matter what, I just can't fathom another Dem who has vowed to go after the 2nd. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:41:58 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Still hoping for Cruz myself but as I said, I'm voting R no matter what, I just can't fathom another Dem who has vowed to go after the 2nd. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SNIP Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. A chance is a chance. It's far better than the utter thrashing we'd get in 2020 with Trump. I'm not moping because my guy didn't get in. I'll take any actual Republican other than Bush. Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Paul. I don't care at this point. But not Trump. Still hoping for Cruz myself but as I said, I'm voting R no matter what, I just can't fathom another Dem who has vowed to go after the 2nd. Trump is a liberal, just like Hillary is. That's the problem. Having an R next to his name doesn't change who he is. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:42:39 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I answered. 'Yes' and 'No' are not the only answers. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Asking whether you would vote for Hillary or Trump is like asking whether you would want to lose your left leg or your right leg. You never answered the question. All it takes is a yes or no. I answered. 'Yes' and 'No' are not the only answers. One of those two is almost certainly going to be president. If you don't understand that one has a more destructive agenda than the other you might need a CAT scan or something... Neither is my candidate of choice, but facts are facts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:46:07 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One of those two is almost certainly going to be president. If you don't understand that one has a more destructive agenda than the other you might need a CAT scan or something... Neither is my candidate of choice, but facts are facts. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Asking whether you would vote for Hillary or Trump is like asking whether you would want to lose your left leg or your right leg. You never answered the question. All it takes is a yes or no. I answered. 'Yes' and 'No' are not the only answers. One of those two is almost certainly going to be president. If you don't understand that one has a more destructive agenda than the other you might need a CAT scan or something... Neither is my candidate of choice, but facts are facts. There's still a chance to stop Trump before it's too late. Hopefully we succeed. Both Hillary and Trump would be highly disastrous for this country. If you don't recognize that, I'd suggest you take the CAT scan yourself. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:46:48 PM EDT
[#12]
Fact remains that one is more destructive than the other.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:47:47 PM EDT
[#13]
Nope.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:50:36 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fact remains that one is more destructive than the other. Disagree. Hillary is more immediately bad. Trump causes much worse effects a few years down the road. Edit: Worse because we don't get a chance to do anything about his negative effects, because one of those negative effects is keeping us out of government for nearly a decade, if not longer. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:52:45 PM EDT
[#15]
Great post, too bad it will fall on the shoulders of the deaf, dumb and blind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:53:00 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Disagree. Hillary is more immediately bad. Trump causes much worse effects a few years down the road. Edit: Worse because we don't get a chance to do anything about his negative effects, because one of those negative effects is keeping us out of government for nearly a decade, if not longer. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Fact remains that one is more destructive than the other. Disagree. Hillary is more immediately bad. Trump causes much worse effects a few years down the road. Edit: Worse because we don't get a chance to do anything about his negative effects, because one of those negative effects is keeping us out of government for nearly a decade, if not longer. Doubtful (and I'm a trump hater TM). Regardless, republicans will take the blame anyway because liberals have a stranglehold on the media. When you control the message, you control public opinion. That would be no different if anyone won the presidency. The notion that Hillary and Trump are the same is just plain stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:56:41 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Doubtful (and I'm a trump hater TM). Regardless, republicans will take the blame anyway because liberals have a stranglehold on the media. When you control the message, you control public opinion. That would be no different if anyone won the presidency. The notion that Hillary and Trump are the same is just plain stupid. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fact remains that one is more destructive than the other. Disagree. Hillary is more immediately bad. Trump causes much worse effects a few years down the road. Edit: Worse because we don't get a chance to do anything about his negative effects, because one of those negative effects is keeping us out of government for nearly a decade, if not longer. Doubtful (and I'm a trump hater TM). Regardless, republicans will take the blame anyway because liberals have a stranglehold on the media. When you control the message, you control public opinion. That would be no different if anyone won the presidency. The notion that Hillary and Trump are the same is just plain stupid. It's not a public message issue. It's that Trump will be so bad as President that he'll kill future Republican campaigns simply by association. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 5:59:37 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
SNIP Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. Thinking you are entitled to my vote for a candidate I don't want sure sounds like you don't believe in freedom. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:01:09 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's not a public message issue. It's that Trump will be so bad as President that he'll kill future Republican campaigns simply by association. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fact remains that one is more destructive than the other. Disagree. Hillary is more immediately bad. Trump causes much worse effects a few years down the road. Edit: Worse because we don't get a chance to do anything about his negative effects, because one of those negative effects is keeping us out of government for nearly a decade, if not longer. Doubtful (and I'm a trump hater TM). Regardless, republicans will take the blame anyway because liberals have a stranglehold on the media. When you control the message, you control public opinion. That would be no different if anyone won the presidency. The notion that Hillary and Trump are the same is just plain stupid. It's not a public message issue. It's that Trump will be so bad as President that he'll kill future Republican campaigns simply by association. Worst case he'd be a "do-nothing" president. Hillary will do more damage. She is like Obama, but smarter and more evil. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:01:42 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Worst case he'd be a "do-nothing" president. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Doubtful (and I'm a trump hater TM). Regardless, republicans will take the blame anyway because liberals have a stranglehold on the media. When you control the message, you control public opinion. That would be no different if anyone won the presidency. The notion that Hillary and Trump are the same is just plain stupid. It's not a public message issue. It's that Trump will be so bad as President that he'll kill future Republican campaigns simply by association. Worst case he'd be a "do-nothing" president. Guess we'll have to disagree. I hope we never find out which of us is right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:02:36 PM EDT
[#21]
I will vote to keep the lying criminal Hillary or the socialist Bern out of the white house. period.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:04:20 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump is a liberal. Wake the fuck up. You've convinced me... I'm voting for Hillary now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:10:28 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You've convinced me... I'm voting for Hillary now. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Trump is a liberal. Wake the fuck up. You've convinced me... I'm voting for Hillary now. I'm assuming you voted Trump in the primary. That's ok, you don't need to vote for Hillary. You've already done enough to fuck the US over. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:16:36 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thinking you are entitled to my vote for a candidate I don't want sure sounds like you don't believe in freedom. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SNIP Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. Thinking you are entitled to my vote for a candidate I don't want sure sounds like you don't believe in freedom. When is the last time you voted for someone you whole heartedly wanted. We all make compromises, it's part of life. I'm not entitled to anything, just trying to point out the consequences of not voting R. I'm stating what I'm doing and why. You are free to do as you wish if not willing to compromise, and accept what happens to what little freedom we have left. The sad reality is we only have 2 real choices come election day, D or R otherwise your vote means shit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:17:47 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When is the last time you voted for someone you whole heartedly wanted. We all make compromises, it's part of life. I'm not entitled to anything, just trying to point out the consequences of not voting R. I'm stating what I'm doing and why. You are free to do as you wish if not willing to compromise, and accept what happens to what little freedom we have left. The sad reality is we only have 2 real choices come election day, D or R otherwise your vote means shit. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SNIP Neither one is acceptable. Again, might as well ask whether I'd prefer Sander or Hillary. Edit: Hillary wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then a chance to beat her in 2020. Trump wins, we get 4 years of shit. Then the Dems win in 2020, 2024, and probably 2028. I also think we'll lose the House and Senate during that time period. So neither option is acceptable. Heard that in '08 when FBHO got in, how'd that work out in '12? Anyone who doesn't vote R is part of the problem. For those not willing to vote R no matter what please continue to mope because your guy might not get the nod. Petulant children are abound come election time, it would make for great entertainment if it wasn't so sad. Thinking you are entitled to my vote for a candidate I don't want sure sounds like you don't believe in freedom. When is the last time you voted for someone you whole heartedly wanted. We all make compromises, it's part of life. I'm not entitled to anything, just trying to point out the consequences of not voting R. I'm stating what I'm doing and why. You are free to do as you wish if not willing to compromise, and accept what happens to what little freedom we have left. The sad reality is we only have 2 real choices come election day, D or R otherwise your vote means shit. And in the case of Trump v Clinton, the options are D or D. 
Left leg or right leg, which would you rather lose? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:20:29 PM EDT
[#26]
I'm just not clear on what the OP would have me "join or die". I vote, so I participate in the political process, what else does he think I should join?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:23:59 PM EDT
[#27]
This election year is absolutely batshit fucky on both sides of the same party. This is how I see the current crop of candidates:
A Fraudulent Bitch A Commie A Narcissistic Businessman A Doctor A RINO with big ears from Florida A Guy from Ohio whose name I cannot pronounce A Creepy Guy who is the best candidate for the job. and then here comes Romney with the big words for the GOPe, let alone the Convention Threat. However this ends up, this may well be the last election I would vote in, it's just stupid. ( Encourage me to hang in there for the next Mid-terms ) 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:32:06 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
SNIP And in the case of Trump v Clinton, the options are D or D.
Left leg or right leg, which would you rather lose? No problem giving you a straight answer: Trump (if he gets the nod) - Anti immigration pro second amendment = Right leg Clinton - Anti 2nd and pro immigration = Left leg I'll go with losing the left. At least I could still defend myself from my wheelchair and live to fight another day. Are there any other options that are truly viable, not just a dream of a knight in shining armor coming to save us in a future election or dismemberment? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:34:30 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm assuming you voted Trump in the primary. That's ok, you don't need to vote for Hillary. You've already done enough to fuck the US over. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump is a liberal. Wake the fuck up. You've convinced me... I'm voting for Hillary now. I'm assuming you voted Trump in the primary. That's ok, you don't need to vote for Hillary. You've already done enough to fuck the US over. And you would be assuming wrong, cupcake. I voted Cruz in the primary. All of you holier-than-thou perfectionists are why we continue to have liberals calling the shots, whether they are GOPe rinos or part of the established liberal regime. I am not a huge fan of Trump but if it comes down to him or Hillary... you can bet your ass it will be Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:38:06 PM EDT
[#30]
Join or Die? May the GOP rest in peace. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:41:13 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
To be honest we are probably fucked either way at this point. The country is circling the shitter not much time now. Although being able to defend myself when the collapse comes is very advantageous. So lets vote for whoever the GOP nominates. Yup. The 'this is the last/defining election' was a few back lol around 2008 |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:49:26 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted: Ben Franklin wrote a political cartoon - which pictured a snake that was cut up into eight pieces, with the words "Join Or Die" written below. It spoke to the disjointed state of the Colonies, and their inability to unite together against a common enemy. The same is true at this very moment in time. We have to put our petty Trump, Cruz, Rubio, Kaesich, and Carson differences aside, for the good of our country. We must join together to prevent Hillary from taking the Presidency, or we will die as a country. She will appoint a liberal SCOTUS Justice to replace Scalia, and then every single liberal, unconstitutional, wet dream will become the law of the land. Including the loss of our gun rights. So stop the divisiveness. It only hurts our ability to pull together. Join or Die.... I'm done with the lesser of two evils. I'll write in Trump or Cruz before I vote for Rubio or any other Establishment Candidate.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:51:52 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
We are fucked either way. How? Either the democrats take away your freedom, or the republicans trade it away playing chess. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:56:27 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When is the last time you voted for someone you whole heartedly wanted. Last Tuesday when I pulled the lever for Cruz. Well, there wasn't really a lever, it was more of an electronic thing. I didn't even have to question the decision to pull the lever for the Texas Senator that has continuously stood up to liberals. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 6:59:42 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And you would be assuming wrong, cupcake. I voted Cruz in the primary. All of you holier-than-thou perfectionists are why we continue to have liberals calling the shots, whether they are GOPe rinos or part of the established liberal regime. I am not a huge fan of Trump but if it comes down to him or Hillary... you can bet your ass it will be Trump. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump is a liberal. Wake the fuck up. You've convinced me... I'm voting for Hillary now. I'm assuming you voted Trump in the primary. That's ok, you don't need to vote for Hillary. You've already done enough to fuck the US over. And you would be assuming wrong, cupcake. I voted Cruz in the primary. All of you holier-than-thou perfectionists are why we continue to have liberals calling the shots, whether they are GOPe rinos or part of the established liberal regime. I am not a huge fan of Trump but if it comes down to him or Hillary... you can bet your ass it will be Trump. My mistake. What makes you think I'm a perfectionist? There's a world of difference between "I'm only voting for X" and "I'll vote for anyone but X". |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 7:00:18 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Guess we'll have to disagree. I hope we never find out which of us is right. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Doubtful (and I'm a trump hater TM). Regardless, republicans will take the blame anyway because liberals have a stranglehold on the media. When you control the message, you control public opinion. That would be no different if anyone won the presidency. The notion that Hillary and Trump are the same is just plain stupid. It's not a public message issue. It's that Trump will be so bad as President that he'll kill future Republican campaigns simply by association. Worst case he'd be a "do-nothing" president. Guess we'll have to disagree. I hope we never find out which of us is right. The only way we don't find out is if Hillary wins (in which case we all lose). I'd take my chances with Trump over Hillary any day. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 7:03:08 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The only way we don't find out is if Hillary wins (in which case we all lose). I'd take my chances with Trump over Hillary any day. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Doubtful (and I'm a trump hater TM). Regardless, republicans will take the blame anyway because liberals have a stranglehold on the media. When you control the message, you control public opinion. That would be no different if anyone won the presidency. The notion that Hillary and Trump are the same is just plain stupid. It's not a public message issue. It's that Trump will be so bad as President that he'll kill future Republican campaigns simply by association. Worst case he'd be a "do-nothing" president. Guess we'll have to disagree. I hope we never find out which of us is right. The only way we don't find out is if Hillary wins (in which case we all lose). I'd take my chances with Trump over Hillary any day. Or if Trump doesn't become the nominee. One can hope. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 7:04:54 PM EDT
[#38]
So about 60-65% of the GOP electorate are supporting two candidates the GOPe loathes, yet we're supposed to just back down and accept amnesty. Fuck no and fuck that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 7:19:48 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah. No. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Join Cruz. Yeah. No. Show me on the doll where the mean ole constitution touched you Txl |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 7:29:42 PM EDT
[#40]
Trump is a chode, but he'd probably be better than Rubio, or any other current candidate not named Cruz...
Sadly, he's more disliked than Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 7:48:35 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And you would be assuming wrong, cupcake. I voted Cruz in the primary. All of you holier-than-thou perfectionists are why we continue to have liberals calling the shots, whether they are GOPe rinos or part of the established liberal regime. I am not a huge fan of Trump but if it comes down to him or Hillary... you can bet your ass it will be Trump. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump is a liberal. Wake the fuck up. You've convinced me... I'm voting for Hillary now. I'm assuming you voted Trump in the primary. That's ok, you don't need to vote for Hillary. You've already done enough to fuck the US over. And you would be assuming wrong, cupcake. I voted Cruz in the primary. All of you holier-than-thou perfectionists are why we continue to have liberals calling the shots, whether they are GOPe rinos or part of the established liberal regime. I am not a huge fan of Trump but if it comes down to him or Hillary... you can bet your ass it will be Trump. We continue to have liberals calling the shots because up until now we've had to settle for lukewarm Republican candidates that can't win a general election. This time we have a good one and people would rather vote for Comacho. I'm done settling. Fuck compromising my principles so you can have your liberal in a Republican's clothes. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/3/2016 8:00:00 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm done with the lesser of two evils. I'll write in Trump or Cruz before I vote for Rubio or any other Establishment Candidate. I'm done. For my entire life as a voter, I've voted for the lesser of two evils. I voted for Bush, I voted for McCain, I voted for Romney. I AM DONE. I sent Rubio to DC and he hasn't done SHIT! I sent De la Portilla to Tallahassee and he fucking is killing Open Carry and Campus Carry in FL. Both are GOP Republicans and both have stabbed me in the back. I'm done. Fuck lesser of two evils. I will vote for those that I want and that's it. Because voting for the lesser of two evils hasn't gotten me shit. If that means a Socialist like Bernie or a Thief like Hillary gets into office. I don't give a fuck. The United States is either going to get better or get worse. The stop gap kicking the can down the road shit doesn't work. I think we're going to go Socialist.... there is no turning the ship around. As for the 2nd Amendment, the Constitution, etc.... if we were vesting our liberties and freedoms in one man on a court bench..... they were long gone already. Heller doesn't stop anything. McDonald doesn't stop anything. If those in power pass laws that restrict me. Either I abide by those laws or I don't. Just like you have people today make that decision everyday with laws. But once again.... I AM DONE WITH THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Ben Franklin wrote a political cartoon - which pictured a snake that was cut up into eight pieces, with the words "Join Or Die" written below. It spoke to the disjointed state of the Colonies, and their inability to unite together against a common enemy. The same is true at this very moment in time. We have to put our petty Trump, Cruz, Rubio, Kaesich, and Carson differences aside, for the good of our country. We must join together to prevent Hillary from taking the Presidency, or we will die as a country. She will appoint a liberal SCOTUS Justice to replace Scalia, and then every single liberal, unconstitutional, wet dream will become the law of the land. Including the loss of our gun rights. So stop the divisiveness. It only hurts our ability to pull together. Join or Die.... I'm done with the lesser of two evils. I'll write in Trump or Cruz before I vote for Rubio or any other Establishment Candidate. I'm done. For my entire life as a voter, I've voted for the lesser of two evils. I voted for Bush, I voted for McCain, I voted for Romney. I AM DONE. I sent Rubio to DC and he hasn't done SHIT! I sent De la Portilla to Tallahassee and he fucking is killing Open Carry and Campus Carry in FL. Both are GOP Republicans and both have stabbed me in the back. I'm done. Fuck lesser of two evils. I will vote for those that I want and that's it. Because voting for the lesser of two evils hasn't gotten me shit. If that means a Socialist like Bernie or a Thief like Hillary gets into office. I don't give a fuck. The United States is either going to get better or get worse. The stop gap kicking the can down the road shit doesn't work. I think we're going to go Socialist.... there is no turning the ship around. As for the 2nd Amendment, the Constitution, etc.... if we were vesting our liberties and freedoms in one man on a court bench..... they were long gone already. Heller doesn't stop anything. McDonald doesn't stop anything. If those in power pass laws that restrict me. Either I abide by those laws or I don't. Just like you have people today make that decision everyday with laws. But once again.... I AM DONE WITH THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS. I am convinced at this point that short of a non establishment candidate being elected and righting this ship in the interests of this nation and not those of globalists or commies we are headed for a constitutional convention and blood in the streets. Maybe worse. If that is what it takes so be it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2016 4:41:44 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yup. The 'this is the last/defining election' was a few back lol around 2008 Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: To be honest we are probably fucked either way at this point. The country is circling the shitter not much time now. Although being able to defend myself when the collapse comes is very advantageous. So lets vote for whoever the GOP nominates. Yup. The 'this is the last/defining election' was a few back lol around 2008 Long, long before that. We're talking about a party that elected a gun grabbing, California progressive who turned deficit spending into the national sport by appealing to democrats in the south who liked welfare and the military as much as they loved Jesus. Even that was beyond the turning point. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2016 4:47:30 AM EDT
[#44]
Join or die would be a valid point after the nomination. The primaries are time to pull for the candidate that best represents your positions, both so they can get the nomination or have their positions incorporated into the party platform. The any body but Hillary train doesn't happen till after the convention
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2016 4:47:53 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not me. I voted for McCain. I voted for Romney. Didn't work. I will not vote for any candidate that supports amnesty. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Funny how we should all "hang together" and vote for who the GOPe nominates. How about the GOPe holds their collective nose for a change and votes for who the base wants? I think that many here - including me - have said that they would vote for ANYONE other than Hillary. Which means ANYONE. So you'll likely get your wish. Not me. I voted for McCain. I voted for Romney. Didn't work. I will not vote for any candidate that supports amnesty. FMR |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2016 7:49:53 AM EDT
[#46]
Originally Posted By SWIRE
It's pretty easy to understand. If the GOPe forces a candidate on us, I'll write in Trump. I'm not voting for their candidate. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/donald-trump-republican-party.html?_r=0 Mr. McConnell has begun preparing senators for the prospect of a Trump nomination, assuring them that, if it threatened to harm them in the general election, they could run negative ads about Mr. Trump to create space between him and Republican senators seeking re-election. Mr. McConnell has raised the possibility of treating Mr. Trump’s loss as a given and describing a Republican Senate to voters as a necessary check on a President Hillary Clinton, according to senators at the lunches. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
