User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 10:42:09 PM EDT
[#1]
same here nolo is doing great!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 10:42:09 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m35ben:
Listening now. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m35ben:
If one truth was said tonight, Nolo IS my hero. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 10:43:34 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m35ben: Listening now. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m35ben: |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 10:45:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m35ben:
Listening now. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m35ben:
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 10:46:40 PM EDT
[#5]
So the NRA isn't helping with this at all!?
 
<- NRA member btw. They are a great organisation, but really? |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 10:58:07 PM EDT
[#6]
Listening and shirt ordered. Keep it up, Nolo.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 10:59:28 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BuckeyeRifleman:
So the NRA isn't helping with this at all!?
<- NRA member btw. They are a great organisation, but really? Two things..... 1) they are afraid to put their name behind anything that may not succeed. 2) people are correct, I believe when they say that the NRA doesn't want a total gun rights victory...because they feed off the donations from people who want 2A freedoms. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 11:04:39 PM EDT
[#8]
That was fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 11:06:24 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By alphajaguars:
 Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By alphajaguars:
Represent!!! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/11/2016 11:09:28 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PlayFront36: Listening and shirt ordered. Keep it up, Nolo. |
|
|
|
NV, USA
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 12:02:21 AM EDT
[#11]
Apparently i missed NOLO, =(
Recording anyone??? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 12:14:11 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOrdered! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 12:17:15 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RANGER_556:
Two things..... 1) they are afraid to put their name behind anything that may not succeed. 2) people are correct, I believe when they say that the NRA doesn't want a total gun rights victory...because they feed off the donations from people who want 2A freedoms. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RANGER_556:
Originally Posted By BuckeyeRifleman:
So the NRA isn't helping with this at all!?
<- NRA member btw. They are a great organisation, but really? Two things..... 1) they are afraid to put their name behind anything that may not succeed. 2) people are correct, I believe when they say that the NRA doesn't want a total gun rights victory...because they feed off the donations from people who want 2A freedoms. Plus, litigation really isn't their thing. NRA does a pretty good job at heading stuff off at the legislation level though. I'd like to see some more aggressiveness in repealing BS through legislation though, vice being continuously on defense. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 8:01:31 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Freedom_Or_DEATH:
Apparently i missed NOLO, =( Recording anyone??? The youtube link still works for me, was just listening to Nolo on the show. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 8:35:42 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wingnut116ACW:
Well yeah, just don't have the extra cash for the stamp. Getting an M203 at the moment. But you should follow stuff at reardendarmament.com for more destructive device developments. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wingnut116ACW:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By Wingnut116ACW:
If you need a copy of my unredacted hand grenade Form 1 or some nice studio shots of the device itself, you just let me know. http://i1285.photobucket.com/albums/a595/Wingnut116ACW/frag_zpsg0undmzo.jpg Are you still thinking about doing an antipersonnel mine? Well yeah, just don't have the extra cash for the stamp. Getting an M203 at the moment. But you should follow stuff at reardendarmament.com for more destructive device developments. That website's not coming up for me, are you sure the address is correct? I have followed your thread on Grogg's forum which was great BTW. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 8:55:06 AM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 9:00:52 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By dcormier1:
I am aware of that but my point was for it to be in the same law so that the challenge would be together. Force them to agree that a tax on a right is unconstitutional or it is constitutional. Leave them will not retreat. Its either all yes or all no. No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 12:24:55 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Undefined:
Keep talking. You've got my attention. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By RockHard13F:
Pretty sure you can actually do a 60mm mortar for the price of a nicer AR with optics. Mine was only $2500, and I have a very nice mortar. And there is talk of many, many more DDs becoming available and cheap. Soon. 
Keep talking. You've got my attention.   
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 3:47:37 PM EDT
[#19]
Might be a bad idea... ;-)
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/12/police-officer-shows-judge-grenade-works-court-three-injured/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 9:17:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: dillehayd]
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
Originally Posted By dcormier1:
I am aware of that but my point was for it to be in the same law so that the challenge would be together. Force them to agree that a tax on a right is unconstitutional or it is constitutional. Leave them will not retreat. Its either all yes or all no. No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. You would do well to learn the difference between wrong and right vs what the court's have ruled. Maybe you wouldn't come off like a gigantic flaccid dripping prick as often. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 9:35:20 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By dillehayd:
You would do well to learn the difference between wrong and right vs what the court's have ruled. Maybe you wouldn't come off like a gigantic flaccid dripping prick as often. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By dillehayd:
Originally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
Originally Posted By dcormier1:
I am aware of that but my point was for it to be in the same law so that the challenge would be together. Force them to agree that a tax on a right is unconstitutional or it is constitutional. Leave them will not retreat. Its either all yes or all no. No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. You would do well to learn the difference between wrong and right vs what the court's have ruled. Maybe you wouldn't come off like a gigantic flaccid dripping prick as often. just because he's aware of the reality of the system doesn't mean he's personally endorsing it I also find his defeatism tiresome, but he's not wrong about this |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 9:39:40 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
Originally Posted By dcormier1:
I am aware of that but my point was for it to be in the same law so that the challenge would be together. Force them to agree that a tax on a right is unconstitutional or it is constitutional. Leave them will not retreat. Its either all yes or all no. No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. There are forces at play with every Federal judge. They do not exist and make decisions in a vacuum. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 9:46:04 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MaxTheRabbit:
just because he's aware of the reality of the system doesn't mean he's personally endorsing it I also find his defeatism tiresome, but he's not wrong about this Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MaxTheRabbit:
Originally Posted By dillehayd:
Originally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
Originally Posted By dcormier1:
I am aware of that but my point was for it to be in the same law so that the challenge would be together. Force them to agree that a tax on a right is unconstitutional or it is constitutional. Leave them will not retreat. Its either all yes or all no. No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. You would do well to learn the difference between wrong and right vs what the court's have ruled. Maybe you wouldn't come off like a gigantic flaccid dripping prick as often. just because he's aware of the reality of the system doesn't mean he's personally endorsing it I also find his defeatism tiresome, but he's not wrong about this To think anyone is above reproach, especially in a political climate as ours is misguided. Party lines I feel have been a larger influence than the constitution recently, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 9:59:43 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xxprince:
To think anyone is above reproach, especially in a political climate as ours is misguided. Party lines I feel have been a larger influence than the constitution recently, unfortunately. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xxprince:
Originally Posted By MaxTheRabbit:
Originally Posted By dillehayd:
Originally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
Originally Posted By dcormier1:
I am aware of that but my point was for it to be in the same law so that the challenge would be together. Force them to agree that a tax on a right is unconstitutional or it is constitutional. Leave them will not retreat. Its either all yes or all no. No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. You would do well to learn the difference between wrong and right vs what the court's have ruled. Maybe you wouldn't come off like a gigantic flaccid dripping prick as often. just because he's aware of the reality of the system doesn't mean he's personally endorsing it I also find his defeatism tiresome, but he's not wrong about this To think anyone is above reproach, especially in a political climate as ours is misguided. Party lines I feel have been a larger influence than the constitution recently, unfortunately. I interpreted the "no one" in his bolded comment to mean "no litigant" not that he was saying judges aren't influenced by corruption |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/12/2016 10:05:43 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryThat SecondCall thing sounds like a scam. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 12:31:42 AM EDT
[Last Edit: wolfwood]
[#26]
For everyone asking about short barrel shotguns ]
This is everything I know about them put into my reply brief in Young It starts on page 11 of the brief http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Young-v.-Hawaii_Appellants-Reply-Brief_37.pdf |
|
|
|
NV, USA
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 2:58:33 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mariner82:
Plus, litigation really isn't their thing. NRA does a pretty good job at heading stuff off at the legislation level though. of waiting till the last second before a win to jump in like white knights. I'd like to see some more BALLS aggressiveness in repealing BS through legislation though, vice being continuously on defense THE TRIFLE. FIFY |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 3:04:22 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Freedom_Or_DEATH: FIFY Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Freedom_Or_DEATH: Originally Posted By Mariner82: Plus, litigation really isn't their thing. NRA does a pretty good job at heading stuff off at the legislation level though. of waiting till the last second before a win to jump in like white knights. I'd like to see some more BALLS aggressiveness in repealing BS through legislation though, vice being continuously on defense THE TRIFLE. FIFY |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 6:13:49 AM EDT
[#29]
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 6:46:10 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wolfwood:
For everyone asking about short barrel shotguns ] This is everything I know about them put into my reply brief in Young It starts on page 11 of the brief http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Young-v.-Hawaii_Appellants-Reply-Brief_37.pdf What was the original cause/charge? Good brief, I'd like to see HI loosen up a bit. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 8:39:28 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 8:47:27 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Undefined:
The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 9:06:20 AM EDT
[Last Edit: jmorg51]
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. MIKE DROPPED!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 9:08:56 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wolfwood:
For everyone asking about short barrel shotguns ] This is everything I know about them put into my reply brief in Young It starts on page 11 of the brief http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Young-v.-Hawaii_Appellants-Reply-Brief_37.pdf "Vice President Biden has recently endorsed shotguns..." Love it!!! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 9:11:35 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MaxTheRabbit:
just because he's aware of the reality of the system doesn't mean he's personally endorsing it I also find his defeatism tiresome, but he's not wrong about this Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MaxTheRabbit:
Originally Posted By dillehayd:
Originally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
Originally Posted By dcormier1:
I am aware of that but my point was for it to be in the same law so that the challenge would be together. Force them to agree that a tax on a right is unconstitutional or it is constitutional. Leave them will not retreat. Its either all yes or all no. No, it's not. I'm sorry to be the bearer of ill tidings but your conception of how things work in incorrect. In the first place, no one forces a Federal judge to reach any conclusion. No one with experience in the legal system would try. You would do well to learn the difference between wrong and right vs what the court's have ruled. Maybe you wouldn't come off like a gigantic flaccid dripping prick as often. just because he's aware of the reality of the system doesn't mean he's personally endorsing it I also find his defeatism tiresome, but he's not wrong about this It's not defeatism. It's constant argument against these cases and the principles that underpin them. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 9:16:30 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. I will be happy to give you my vote! 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 9:58:18 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that.
You know you have my vote. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:11:41 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Dude. Yes. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:17:55 AM EDT
[#39]
You got my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:18:04 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. You have my vote. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:28:44 AM EDT
[#41]
Nolo for NRA Board of Directors!!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:33:38 AM EDT
[#42]
my client sued pro se to have the entire weapons chapter enjoined so it was essentially a grab bag to go after whatever we wanted
|
|
|
|
PA, USA
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:40:01 AM EDT
[#43]
Listening to the audio.
It sounds to me like the PDW should have been mentioned in response to some of the specific questions about the suitability of MG's for defensive use: "PERSONAL DEFENSE weapon." PERSONAL ... DEFENSE |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:44:59 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fargo007:
Listening to the audio. It sounds to me like the PDW should have been mentioned in response to some of the specific questions about the suitability of MG's for defensive use: "PERSONAL DEFENSE weapon." PERSONAL ... DEFENSE We briefed that. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 10:53:14 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere: I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere: Originally Posted By Undefined: Originally Posted By scmar: If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 11:04:52 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NoloContendere:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. 
Here, have my vote please. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 11:10:53 AM EDT
[Last Edit: us-kiwi]
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By jmorg51: MIKE DROPPED!!!!! Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By jmorg51: Originally Posted By NoloContendere: Originally Posted By Undefined: Originally Posted By scmar: If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. MIKE DROPPED!!!!! Nolo, how many votes do you need, ballpark wise? I see an arfcom firemission in the near future !!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 11:16:51 AM EDT
[#48]
At the end of the day the NRA is not going any place. If you really want to force change it has to be done from the inside. I will be proud to stand with Nolo to the extent he will need me as he sets sight on this new mission.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 11:29:40 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By jaqufrost:
I need to order one in OD. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By jaqufrost:
Originally Posted By PlayFront36:
Listening and shirt ordered. Keep it up, Nolo. Ordered OD as well. Go Nolo GO! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/13/2016 11:39:04 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By us-kiwi:
Nolo, how many votes do you need, ballpark wise? I see an arfcom firemission in the near future !!!!! Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By us-kiwi:
Originally Posted By jmorg51:
Originally Posted By NoloContendere:
Originally Posted By Undefined:
Originally Posted By scmar:
If half of arfcom members were NRA voting members, and financial supporters of NOLO and/or The Heller Foundation , it would go along way toward getting the changes we seek. Currently we have at least 3 arfcom members on the NRA BOD, can we get more why not? The only thing holding us back is a lack of volunteers stepping up to go through the process and get elected to serve on the board. I'm announcing at NRA convention. So there's that. MIKE DROPPED!!!!!
Nolo, how many votes do you need, ballpark wise? I see an arfcom firemission in the near future !!!!! He'll need at least 500 signatures to get on the ballot. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
