[ARCHIVED THREAD] - ..... (Page 1 of 5)
|
Quoted:
Yes. <a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zps3628c1fd.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zps3628c1fd.jpg</a> I hope you know that looks disgusting. I mean, hey, enjoy it and all, but damn. |
| They are a great way to enjoy your SBR while waiting for the stamp to come back. Shooting them as is can be tough, but you can always fashion a short sling and attach it to the rear of the receiver. push the weapon away from you to create tension and it makes a pretty stable shooting platform. SIG is great for that. |
|
I SBRed one of the Sigs and it is a nice toy now. |
|
What sort of hack job barrel is that? It looks like a cut down Draco. Pics of gas piston, or what's left or it? |
|
Quoted:
What sort of hack job barrel is that? It looks like a cut down Draco. Pics of gas piston, or what's left or it? Quoted:
What sort of hack job barrel is that? It looks like a cut down Draco. Pics of gas piston, or what's left or it? Micro draco |
|
Quoted:
I hope you know that looks disgusting. I mean, hey, enjoy it and all, but damn. Quoted:
Quoted:
Yes. <a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zps3628c1fd.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zps3628c1fd.jpg</a> I hope you know that looks disgusting. I mean, hey, enjoy it and all, but damn. Tag for pic of missing finger after it accidentally slips in front of muzzle (date TBD). |
|
That poor AK. It's like a lowered ghetto truck with no room for any suspension travel. |
|
Quoted:
I built/assembled an AR pistol because 1) I simply can and wanted to 2) Liberals hate them. Why do we need to justify owning any gun? No shit. I have an M92. I plan to SBR it. As far as blaming people who own them for the ban of AP ammo... let's leave the fault where it belongs; with the politicians who created the law. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
An SBR is a Rifle, and therefore illegal to carry in the front seat loaded and uncased in my state. A pistol, I can lay on the front seat. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car."
|
|
Quoted:
No shit. I have an M92. I plan to SBR it. As far as blaming people who own them for the ban of AP ammo... let's leave the fault where it belongs; with the politicians who created the law. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quoted:
Quoted:
I built/assembled an AR pistol because 1) I simply can and wanted to 2) Liberals hate them. Why do we need to justify owning any gun? No shit. I have an M92. I plan to SBR it. As far as blaming people who own them for the ban of AP ammo... let's leave the fault where it belongs; with the politicians who created the law. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile can we blame Olympic too? |
|
Quoted: An SBR is a Rifle, and therefore illegal to carry in the front seat loaded and uncased in my state. A pistol, I can lay on the front seat. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." |
|
Quoted:
A pistol, I can lay on the front seat. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. Quoted:
Quoted:
An SBR is a Rifle, and therefore illegal to carry in the front seat loaded and uncased in my state. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. But can your 9mm handgun hit a target at 300 yards? |
|
Quoted:
I hope you know that looks disgusting. I mean, hey, enjoy it and all, but damn. Quoted:
Quoted:
Yes. <a href="http://s247.photobucket.com/user/dab969/media/image_zps3628c1fd.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg141/dab969/image_zps3628c1fd.jpg</a> I hope you know that looks disgusting. I mean, hey, enjoy it and all, but damn. This. |
|
Quoted:
A pistol, I can lay on the front seat. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. Quoted:
Quoted:
An SBR is a Rifle, and therefore illegal to carry in the front seat loaded and uncased in my state. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. Depends on the round. 7.62x39 loses very little velocity from an M92 vs a normal AK barrel for example, so...it's perfectly viable in that short a package. Now, 5.56...different story. |
|
Quoted: But can your 9mm handgun hit a target at 300 yards? Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: An SBR is a Rifle, and therefore illegal to carry in the front seat loaded and uncased in my state. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. But can your 9mm handgun hit a target at 300 yards? ![]() |
|
Quoted:
A pistol, I can lay on the front seat. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. Maybe I'm ignorant though. Quoted:
Quoted:
An SBR is a Rifle, and therefore illegal to carry in the front seat loaded and uncased in my state. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. Maybe I'm ignorant though. are you saying a 123g SST out of that 8" (appears to be around 8") barrel is similar to a .22lr? ETA: or a 62g TSX (for the 556 offerings) |
|
Quoted: Depends on the round. 7.62x39 loses very little velocity from an M92 vs a normal AK barrel for example, so...it's perfectly viable in that short a package. Now, 5.56...different story. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: An SBR is a Rifle, and therefore illegal to carry in the front seat loaded and uncased in my state. The law doesn't specify if it's an AR-15 pistol or a PF-9. Practical reasons are basically "use from or getting in and out of a car." Question is with such a short barrel, will your "rifle's" rounds have enough velocity to fragment reliably/properly inside soft tissue? I personally do not see a super short SBR as a respectable self defense weapon unless you specifically want the capability to perforate soft body armor. Without reliable fragmentation you're using a high capacity .22. I'd rather use a 9mm with Federal HSTs/Winchester Ranger/Speer Gold Dots if that's the case. Smaller and should provide more tissue damage. Depends on the round. 7.62x39 loses very little velocity from an M92 vs a normal AK barrel for example, so...it's perfectly viable in that short a package. Now, 5.56...different story. |

