Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
PSA
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 1/8/2005 7:03:00 AM EDT
I've seen people posting about the someday when the second ammendment is interpreted to its original intent.  Most talk about how they would have an M-60 or Bren or M-16. With manufacturers free to develop new gewgaws for the masses do you think that you would still buy the old stuff?  Would the thrill of owning a "once banned" weapon over ride the desire for the newest whizbang bullet hose?

The pawn shops will be filled with everything we once owned to run a household just so we could afford ammo!
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:03:55 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/8/2005 7:04:04 AM EDT by Belfry_Express]
my AR would be an M16, simple as that
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:04:50 AM EDT
phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:04:59 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/8/2005 9:39:19 AM EDT by TheRedHorseman]
ignore me I know nothing

Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:09:06 AM EDT
M-16A2 with Beta-C magazines and M203 40mm grenade launcher, RPG-7, M-79, M-60, M-249 SAW, Calico 9mm submachine gun with 100-rnd magazines, PP-2000 SMG, LAW rockets, and my very own tank in the backyard. Oh, and hand grenades, of the frag and W-P varieties. Lots of them. And a Browning .50 machine gun.

There'd be a patch on my land that looks like WWIII every time I went shooting.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:19:26 AM EDT
Prolly These !  
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:21:24 AM EDT
I would just want a full auto .22, anything else would be too expensive to feed!  
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 12:08:21 PM EDT
Then again, if the Second Amendment hadn't been cripple all this time, there would have probably been a bigger market for firearms of all types in the US, which probably would have sparked R&D, which probably would have given up plasma rifles in the 40 watt range.

Link Posted: 1/8/2005 12:53:06 PM EDT
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 12:54:05 PM EDT
m4/203 or galil
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 1:55:23 PM EDT
while the '86 ban would be gone, there is no reason to think that registration, CLEO sign-offs, and tax stamps would be proscribed: registration and administrative hassle does not deny you the RKBA.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 1:56:59 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Avtomat:
while the '86 ban would be gone, there is no reason to think that registration, CLEO sign-offs, and tax stamps would be proscribed: registration and administrative hassle does not deny you the RKBA.



Nothing a 4473 can't handle.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 1:58:37 PM EDT
MP5K for sure.

Prolly an M79 for grins.  

I always thought the M-60 was pretty cool too. One of those.

Ohhh! and...
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 1:58:57 PM EDT
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 1:59:30 PM EDT
Well I expect more devolpment would go on, if the Govt  doesnt like it they can probaly still sell decent on the public market.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 2:00:59 PM EDT
My M4gery would be an actual M4, an MP5k.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 2:07:54 PM EDT
M1919 or possibly M249.  Maybe a FA M2.  Probably the M249 though.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 2:12:43 PM EDT
I'd make the Mac-11 my carry peice
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 2:18:21 PM EDT
Won't happen - too many sheeple willing to throw our rights away - we need to STAY on the offense if the AW ban is too stay sunsetted..........nevermind Class III becoming "normal firearms"

.....I think you can expect to see the same weapons around for either side of the equation - full 2nd Amendment rights reknewed = every kind of firearm known to man being finally possessed legally.  Totally ban guns?  Same firearms in private - unless your a sheep...................because then - it WONT matter if your gun has a bayo lug or not.........I will never be disarmed though
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 2:31:03 PM EDT
whatever I could afford.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 5:26:58 PM EDT

Originally Posted By peekay:

Originally Posted By Avtomat:
while the '86 ban would be gone, there is no reason to think that registration, CLEO sign-offs, and tax stamps would be proscribed: registration and administrative hassle does not deny you the RKBA.



Nothing a 4473 can't handle.

What's "enough" is a policy question--not a constitutional question.  They could permissibly go a lot further
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:03:51 PM EDT
um... whatever we wanted. easy answer.

for me, it would just mean My AR and AK would have a thrid position on the selector... I'd probably also get a SMG or two of some make or another... probably an UZI and an HK
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:05:09 PM EDT
Belt fed.
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 7:15:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/8/2005 7:18:41 PM EDT by Charging_Handle]
Surplus M60 Patton tanks

Surplus M114 155mm towed howitzers

M60's

M240's

M­249's

M2/M3 .50 cal machine guns

Surplus F-4 Phantom jets

LAAW's

M79's

Surplu­s destroyers, cruisers, frigates and submarines

Or basically anything else that goes bang, limited only by whether or not you could afford it. LOL.

-CH
Link Posted: 1/8/2005 10:03:44 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Charging_Handle:
Surplus M60 Patton tanks



-CH



The M60 is the Destroyer, the M48 is the Patton.


Link Posted: 1/8/2005 10:09:06 PM EDT

Originally Posted By Fourays2:
phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range.



I agree. And untill we have those. NOTHING else they try to adopt in the military will be enough of a justifiable difference. (ie xm8 german pos)
Top Top