User Panel
Posted: 9/19/2017 6:09:39 PM EDT
The opponents of the SHARE Act and HPA were pretty brazen to bring this guy in as their "expert witness".
Retired ATF SAC/ASAC David Chipman, failed to mention some important details that are relevant to this case. Served this nation for over 25 years in support of ATF's mission to combat violent crime. Led North American Sales for ShotSpotter.com during period of explosive growth while demonstrating the true nature of gun violence. Dedicated to developing, implementing and evaluating firearms violence reduction strategies aimed at making neighborhoods safe. View Quote The money
ShotSpotter recorded revenue of $15.5 million in 2016, up from $11.8 million in 2015. This was on top of net losses of $6.86 million in 2016, slightly wider than a net loss of $6.19 million in 2015. Almost all of its revenue comes from contracts with local governments and related agencies. The company’s customers pay for the service on an annual subscription basis. The company said it expects to increase its costs in the near future, spending on sales and marketing, expanding internationally and conducting research and development. It plans to use about $13.6 million of its proceeds from the offering to pay off outstanding debt. ShotSpotter has been capital backed by investors including City Light Capital, Claremont Creek Ventures and Labrador Ventures. Motorola Solutions Inc. is also an investor. View Quote They have scrubbed and updated their FAQ regarding questions about suppressor use. It used to read: 16. What about silencers?
While high-quality silencers (also known as "muzzle blast suppressors") do have the ability to defeat ShotSpotter, the reality is, they are very rare and are illegal nationwide. Thus, while owning a licensed gun is not illegal, and carrying it usually is not (depending on jurisdiction), having in one’s possession a silencer is virtually guaranteed to lead to criminal prosecution. Moreover, silencers are both exceedingly difficult to find and have a negative impact on the accuracy and range of gunfire. Perhaps this is why less than 1% of all crimes in which guns are fired involve silencers, according to the FBI. View Quote It was then changed to: 16. Does ShotSpotter detect gunshots from gun silencers?
In regard to gun silencers it is more accurate to call them suppressors as they suppress the impulsive sound of gunfire not wholly eliminate it. We have successfully if not inadvertently detected confirmed suppressed gunfire within our existing deployments. Although we have not formally tested the theoretical impact to our system we intend to do some targeted testing in the near future. We believe we will have various options ranging from increasing our sensor array density to developing software/firmware to address the detection of suppressed gunfire if it were to become a widespread issue. View Quote September 12, 2017
My name is David Chipman and I currently serve as a Senior Policy Advisor for Americans for Responsible Solutions, the gun violence prevention organization founded by former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and retired U.S. Navy Captain and astronaut Mark Kelly. For the purposes of today’s testimony, I will rely heavily on my experiences during my 25-year career as a Special Agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) serving the Departments of Justice and Treasury. View Quote What's interesting is that the ACLU is very concerned about ShotSpotter because it has been used to record conversations when sensors are tripped. The CEO of ShotSpotter said if you're worried about his sensors, then you should also turn off your cell because it has a better microphone. ACLU Concerns on ShotSpotter Second, if a microphone were stationed outside my house, I don’t think I would love that, no matter how many assurances I was given. Clark’s answer to that was,
If you’re really worried about that, what about your cellphone? If you’re worried about NSA boogeymen, they’re not going to be using our sensors, they’ll be using your phone. It’s in your pocket and has a better microphone. View Quote |
|
Good find, but I probably would have guessed that immediately. Lol
|
|
Quoted:
The opponents of the SHARE Act and HPA were pretty brazen to bring this guy in as their "expert witness". Retired ATF SAC/ASAC David Chipman, failed to mention some important details that are relevant to this case. Served this nation for over 25 years in support of ATF's mission to combat violent crime. Led North American Sales for ShotSpotter.com during period of explosive growth while demonstrating the true nature of gun violence. Dedicated to developing, implementing and evaluating firearms violence reduction strategies aimed at making neighborhoods safe. View Quote The money
ShotSpotter recorded revenue of $15.5 million in 2016, up from $11.8 million in 2015. This was on top of net losses of $6.86 million in 2016, slightly wider than a net loss of $6.19 million in 2015. Almost all of its revenue comes from contracts with local governments and related agencies. The company’s customers pay for the service on an annual subscription basis. The company said it expects to increase its costs in the near future, spending on sales and marketing, expanding internationally and conducting research and development. It plans to use about $13.6 million of its proceeds from the offering to pay off outstanding debt. ShotSpotter has been capital backed by investors including City Light Capital, Claremont Creek Ventures and Labrador Ventures. Motorola Solutions Inc. is also an investor. View Quote They have scrubbed and updated their FAQ regarding questions about suppressor use. It used to read: 16. What about silencers?
While high-quality silencers (also known as "muzzle blast suppressors") do have the ability to defeat ShotSpotter, the reality is, they are very rare and are illegal nationwide. Thus, while owning a licensed gun is not illegal, and carrying it usually is not (depending on jurisdiction), having in one’s possession a silencer is virtually guaranteed to lead to criminal prosecution. Moreover, silencers are both exceedingly difficult to find and have a negative impact on the accuracy and range of gunfire. Perhaps this is why less than 1% of all crimes in which guns are fired involve silencers, according to the FBI. View Quote It was then changed to: 16. Does ShotSpotter detect gunshots from gun silencers?
In regard to gun silencers it is more accurate to call them suppressors as they suppress the impulsive sound of gunfire not wholly eliminate it. We have successfully if not inadvertently detected confirmed suppressed gunfire within our existing deployments. Although we have not formally tested the theoretical impact to our system we intend to do some targeted testing in the near future. We believe we will have various options ranging from increasing our sensor array density to developing software/firmware to address the detection of suppressed gunfire if it were to become a widespread issue. View Quote September 12, 2017
My name is David Chipman and I currently serve as a Senior Policy Advisor for Americans for Responsible Solutions, the gun violence prevention organization founded by former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and retired U.S. Navy Captain and astronaut Mark Kelly. For the purposes of today’s testimony, I will rely heavily on my experiences during my 25-year career as a Special Agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) serving the Departments of Justice and Treasury. View Quote What's interesting is that the ACLU is very concerned about ShotSpotter because it has been used to record conversations when sensors are tripped. The CEO of ShotSpotter said if you're worried about his sensors, then you should also turn off your cell because it has a better microphone. ACLU Concerns on ShotSpotter Second, if a microphone were stationed outside my house, I don’t think I would love that, no matter how many assurances I was given. Clark’s answer to that was,
If you’re really worried about that, what about your cellphone? If you’re worried about NSA boogeymen, they’re not going to be using our sensors, they’ll be using your phone. It’s in your pocket and has a better microphone. View Quote View Quote I think if a microphone was outside my house I would be experimenting w/ what it took to set their system off. Loud speakers w/ recorded gunshots, propane popping. Lots of fun experiments w/ a captive microphone. |
|
|
Solid work! Glad to hear you informed the correct people so hopefully they bring his conflict of interests to light
|
|
|
I been told they have shot spotter locally, but also told its not helped them catch anybody. what the truth is no idea. Have read about it not working well in other places.
|
|
They have their shitty shotspotter in nearby Wilmington. Piece of garbage and waste of money.
|
|
Moreover, silencers are both exceedingly difficult to find and have a negative impact on the accuracy and range of gunfire. View Quote Wait! .........What?? |
|
|
Quoted:
So the company is losing millions every year, but is being kept afloat with government contracts, which it plans to increase the fees for. View Quote Sounds like the making of a Ponzi scheme |
|
|
Someone's knowledge of suppressors either comes from the time where they used wipes or Fallout 4.
|
|
Quoted:
Someone's knowledge of suppressors either comes from the time where they used wipes or Fallout 4. View Quote |
|
|
Geez. Well this just warms the cockles of my heart. My cockles are burning.
Good post OP, thanks for the info |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I been told they have shot spotter locally, but also told its not helped them catch anybody. what the truth is no idea. Have read about it not working well in other places. View Quote I think they update their firmware and provide subscription-based services for the network. Many cities have not been able to afford it in the long run. It was the system that helped the DC Police narrow down the location of where Seth Rich was shot. Failed To Load Title |
|
|
The fleecing of America.
This guys scam needs to be revealed. To everyone. |
|
Call your Democratic Party reps and tell them about the animal abuse of our innocent 4-legged friends, as well as the ACLU's position on ShotSpotter surveillance of your conversations, and to support the SHARE Act of 2017, for the chiltrens and animals.
Also demand to know why the Federal Lands Subcommittee would call on a witness like this who has financial ties to a company who supports destroying the hearing of animals, while spying on our conversations. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
There are many municipalities listed on ShotSpotter's website that no longer can afford/discontinued the services because it was cutting into essential functions of local government to be able to pay for the surveillance system monitoring agreement with the company. I think they update their firmware and provide subscription-based services for the network. Many cities have not been able to afford it in the long run. It was the system that helped the DC Police narrow down the location of where Seth Rich was shot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z7U0OUG4oU View Quote |
|
City just south of me has shotspotter. Hasn't been used in some years now since its too pricey to fix all the time last I heard.
|
|
Birmingham(Alabama) has stopped responding to alerts unless there's a Dead Body involved.
|
|
And here is how effective the system is.....
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/City-pulls-plug-on-pricey-gunshot-detection-system-11817475.php |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.