User Panel
Posted: 5/7/2004 10:04:06 AM EDT
Yes, I listen to Rush and I don't care if you don't!
He said "Robert Bird is now speaking..Remember, there were more hoods at his 40th birthday party than you saw at the prison in Iraq" |
|
Isn't that the truth!!! |
|
|
OH SHIT! He just said "Kennedy is calling for the Red Cross to investigate...Why didn't he call for the Red Cross at Chapaquidick(sp)"
|
|
Ya and rush said that the rape and forced sodomy going on in that prison were soldiers just "blowing off steam". Give me a break.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I was listening....I have it on tape.....He said that they were just "blowing off steam" and he called it a faternity prank "just like they do at Skull & Bones" which he also said didn't exsist two months ago. I would also add that I am at this moment reading the 'Article 15-6 Investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade' by Maj Gen Antonio M. Taguba. In it, among the charges of abuse, is rape of male and female prisoners. This is not simple 'beating information out of prisoners', this is the behaviour of rabid animals who are a disgrace to the uniform. It is not an idictment of the entire military in any way. It is a statement of fact about evil that was done in our name and paid for by us. This is exactly what we accused Saddam of and exactly what we demonized (with good reason) the Nazi SS for. It is time to admit that there is right and wrong, and if we are to continue acting like we wear the white hat in this whole thing then we need to start facing up to the evil that went on here; rather than laugh along with a lapdog, yes man, junky radio host. |
||
|
What were you expecting? A 'libertarian' paraphrase? Sorry, but I cannot get too upset about what happens to Iraqi prisoners who are STILL in Coalition custody. Prolly too much American blood on their hands for any of my sympathy! Eric The(Unsurprised)Hun |
||
|
Why is it that there is so much more anger, outrage, and even a congressional investigation on Iragi prison abuse that at worst is described by the Red Cross as bordering on torture than there was anger and outrage when the Americans were killed and mutilated in Fallujah? Why so much media coverage and political outcry for justice on this when these same people hung an American body off a bridge and the media quit covering that in about a week? It's not we lined them up and killed them.
I'm I such a hardass or I'm I missing something here? |
|
|
|
|
Read the Army report. We're supposed to be the good guys. The bodies on the bridge were already dead - they were not tortured. I do not agree with it, and it made me sick, as well. But I will not justify torture and rape just because "they did it first." We are not on a grade school playground here. The Red Coats did all manner of ruthless things to the colonists during the Revolutionary war, but General Washington's men at no time, even when they were starving and frozen, treated British prisoners in no way but honorable. Why? Because it was the right thing to do. We have standards - we believe that ALL MEN are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights. If we do not start behaving that way, we as a nation are doomed. Think about how sick a man has to be to be able to get a hard-on and rape a female prisoner. Someone who is helpless - done while others looked on and laughed. Shame on you for making excuses. |
|
|
AMEN! |
|
|
I'm sorry. You must have just arrived here and missed all the threads where we bitched and moaned about the idiocy of the US personnel involved in these incidents. Everyone pretty much agreed that a prison was precisely where they needed to wind up - BEHIND the bars, rather than in front of them. So, fret not, little fellow, we share your views of how US military personnel should act. But I, for one, refuse to be consumed by this little shiitefest, and the Media is counting on most folks to forget that this prison was the scene of AUTHORIZED rape and murder under the previous regime! Eric The(KeepingHisEyesOnThePrize)Hun |
||
|
No one wears a white hat in war, do not kid yourself. |
|
|
Ahhhh, the Al Franken Is My Sweet Babboo contingent here at ARFCOM rears its ugly head! Liberal drivel, even when repeated here by a Member, is still liberal drivel! How is Al's radio show doing? Did the checks clear, yet? Is it still on the air? Heh-heh-heh! Eric The(BowledOverWithLaughter)Hun |
||
|
I beg your very confused pardon ! My head (and rear!) is , in no way, ugly ! I did, however, send a nice check to Al in your name ! |
|||
|
So your not gay.................................. right. |
||||
|
Who in the heck wants to listen to Al Franken?
Get me Zell Miller. Now there's a Democrat I can listen to. And no I am not a Republican. Registered Independent. CRC |
|
You missed the entire meaning of my rant. In no way do I agree with what happened to the prisoners and I'm also perfectly aware that two wrongs do not make a right. I never said anything about "they did it first" to justify what happened. My point was that the attention and coverage this is getting is exponentially greater than that of what these same Iragis have done to our boys. In my mind, the exposure is inversely proportional to the crimes committed. It boils down to this for me: Why so much more outcry over some trailer trash girl pointing at a naked man's dick than outcry over a dead American hanging from a bridge. I guess it was because the American was just dead, not tortured as you described. |
||
|
It sure was, carried out by people who were trained at the School of America's at US taxpayer expense, done under the fully aware eye's of our own CIA (just like in Iran during the Shah's rule) in order to keep rival factions at bay so the oil would flow. And that's what the "Media" is hoping we forget. Saddam was a bayguy...but he was OUR badguy. I agree that this "torture" issue is a media manipulation. However, it is to make us out the badguy's so the UN Peacekeeper's can come in and take control. That was telegraphed at the start of this debacle when that oh-so-loving organization was given the oil profit rights to Iraq at the beginning of the "war" [I thought only Congress could declare those?] There is nothing going on here on any level, on either side, that is based in any kind of truth. And it's the soldier, as usual, that is stuck in the middle and pays for the sins of others. |
|
|
You should not be ashamed of being gay. Your friends will understand.There are organizations that will help you with your problems. Maybe they will stop your mommy from beating your ass so often. (or maybe not) |
|
|
I more than agree that it is getting "overplayed" - now ask yourself why? Why now, when it's been known about for over a year. Why is this getting play but the commander of Guantanamo quiting because he refused to go along with torturing "goat herders" (his words, not mine) got zero coverage? Perhaps we're being played? |
|||
|
I guess you have a very short attention span and don't remember most if not all of you supported the U.S. govt clamp down on media coverage of U.S. casualties in iraq when the war started. Now you want full coverage. Make up your damned minds. |
|
|
I am beginning to believe that it is a good cop (UN)/bad cop (U.S.) game being played to condition people to accept the UN as a savior. As you mentioned hardly any play came about when the commander resigned from gitmo over torture, but isn't it convienent how all of this iraqi prison stuff is coming out a few months before the U.S. to UN transition? This whole mess started over violations of UN sactions and will end up back in UN hands. |
|
|
Bingo! |
||
|
Post from dtomfrankm-
Oh no! You are one of 'them'! That is so disheartening! You subscribe to the conspiracy theories of the Ultra Far Left! And the Ultra Far Right! That this war was for nothing but oil! Get real, if we were so used to dealing with Saddam, then we would have asked our 'badguy' to simply lower the price on his crude oil. BTW, before the War, Iraqi crude was selling cheaper than any other OPEC nation's oil! Why? And if it was, then why did we want him out? Surely Halliburton could deal with Saddam a whole lot easier than they can deal with Islamo-facists that may likely replace him? The problem with all conspiracy geeks is that they assume they know more than anyone. When in truth they often know less that everyone! That phrase that closed this segment of your post was taken from FDR, by the way. Is he one of your heroes, or not?
Oh, I now see where you're coming from with this paragraph! Congress approved this 'war'. my friend! Do you need to go check that out the Congressional Record, or can you simply grasp that bit of knowledge from the fact that NO opponent of the War in Congress is still urging that lame excuse?
That my friend is sheer BULLSHIITE, plain and simple! I love the way y'all conspiracy geeks explain to us, the gawking hoi polloi, that YOU know the TRUTH on every LEVEL and that YOU favor neither SIDE! You and Art Bell, Baby! You and Art Bell! Y'all know the Truth! Eric The(Savant)Hun |
|||
|
That's why I said "acting." |
||
|
Post from wetidlerjr -
Yes, I am certain that the next time you and Al Franken get together it will be to discuss the relative attractiveness of your respective heads! But leave us out of the discussion, if you don't mind!
That's great! Maybe some of his show's creditors can get paid now! Just watch when you get that check back with your monthly statement and see that he took your check straight to your bank to cash it! I think that's called 'hammering a check'! I can assure you that he's been doing a lot of that lately! Eric The(FormerBankAttorney)Hun |
||
|
Which leg? (Actually you're misrepresenting what he said, but that's nothing new for you.) |
|
|
Which, I guess, establishes that you'll believe ANYTHING...except the truth. |
|
|
Never listened to Art Bell in my life, just making my assesment from what I've read in the Wall Street Journal. FDR was a Commie/Sociallist who I have zero use for. I love the way "You People" can only ever come up with TWO sides to any issue when there are generally multiple layers. Congress "approving" and Congress "declaring" are two completely different things. Halliburton was only awarded ALL of the rebuilding contracts without bidding. And it really isn't a matter of theory at this point. If you go to the PNAC(Project For The New American Century) website, you can read a policy paper writen by Cheney before Bush was elected where he states that Saddam will be used as a pretext for invading Iraq. No consperacy...just what he said. |
||||
|
No, sorry, they are not. |
|
|
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 |
|
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998 |
|
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 |
|
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and
>> our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001 |
|
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 |
|
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 |
|
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 |
|
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 This was clearly brought on by socialist liberals hell bent on destroying the peaceful and legitimate government of Iraq ... and the illegitimate one of the Republik of Amerika. |
|
Brother Paul, save your breath!
You are talking to folks who do not believe that there is 'a dime's worth of difference' between Nancy Pelosi and Helen Chenowith! Between George W. Bush and John F***ing Kerry! Between Dick Cheney and Ralph Nader! So simple reason and logic will not win the argument here! Eric The(Realistic)Hun |
|
Bingo!! Maybe that’s already been said in prior threads - regardless, it’s worth repeating!! |
|
|
Oh yeah....the drug addicted felon who's been given a pass by his loyalists. |
|
|
He was convicted....that's news to me! If he's so horrible, why do you waste your time posting about him?!?!? |
||
|
He admitted what he did....
Atta wasn't "convicted", either, but I'm sure you have no problem refering to him as a scum-bag terrorist. And...I really haven't been posting about him, that seemed to be the complaint I was responding to. |
|
Al said to say hello to you and ask that when you call again to let him know what time to pick you up at the airport. He says he knows the family reunion will be fun. |
|||
|
At least we don't tattle on them to get them banned as happens to "DISRUPTERS" over on his home site. We still believe in the Constitution and we remain comfortable with our differences. We like a robust, rowdy debate...in his idyllic world, there is NO debate, only the party line. Doubt me anyone? Take a trip on the wild side and emulate this in reverse. Travel over to the DU and enter into a "conversation". The nanosecond that you disagree, your outta there! Ya know what? It's a pretty weak mind and character that simply refuses to hear alternatives...and it is right out of the Book of Lenin too. Stick around Troll...you're amusing! |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.