Posted: 6/22/2016 3:35:09 PM EDT
|
Anyone here do any of this? I know SETI is the defacto popular one still to this day with millions of cores running. I also ran some decryption ones as well but they were WAY behind the curve on what was being processed vs. what current encryption was (5+ years ago). Are there any other useful/less-than-useless ones? |
|
Quoted:
There used to be an Arfcom folding group that used to post stats in this section. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_124/785677_join_the_arfcom_Folding_home_team_.html It's pinned at the top 
|
|
Quoted:
Reminds me of a guy who paralleled ~40 first gen Raspberry Pi's together using some linux tools. I think his performance analysis was similar to that of some of the high end super computers from about 15 years prior. Quoted:
Reminds me of a guy who paralleled ~40 first gen Raspberry Pi's together using some linux tools. I think his performance analysis was similar to that of some of the high end super computers from about 15 years prior. http://www.zdnet.com/article/build-your-own-supercomputer-out-of-raspberry-pi-boards/ Kiepert ran the High Performance Linpack (HPL), the standard supercomputer benchmark on his home-made computer and found that his RPiCluster with its 32 Broadcom BCM2708 ARM11 processors running are 1GHz and 14.6GB of usable RAM turned in a HPL peak performance of 10.13 GFLOPS. That's not going to get this cluster into the TOP500 supercomputer list, but as Kiepert observed, "the first Cray-2 supercomputer in 1985 did 1.9 GFLOPS. |