In this thread I will post news as objectively as I can and comment on it and put it into larger context as I understand them. the nature of the human condition. Epistemology and Heteronomic realities will be discussed in a libertine fashion without regard for social mores or politically correct virtue.
The posts will be random
And I will link them everyonce in awhile to the op or on a page with updates.
My goal will be to share great works of intellectual human endeavor and current events.
If you have youtube accounts make play lists of what I add here and listen to them as you drive to work or while you work.
I am also very sarcastic by my nature. It's not your fault.
You raise dirt? How many bushels per acre of dirt are you averaging?
Trump mentions AntiFa insurrectionists in Speech in Az
A bit of analysis of the political religion of the left.
anecdotal wages of identity politics.
That last one was as wrong as two boys fucking in church.
2014 violent crime stats collected by the FBI show that European white protestants, which make up 50% of the population commits 1/12th of the murder. and 4 percent of the murders they commit have back victims.
15,000+ Sign Petition to Jail Lawmaker Who Wished for Trump's Assassination fox news
Trump Phoenix Rally 8-22-17 The president will Pardon Sheriff Joe.
Sheriff Joe proved that Obama's birth certificate is fake, and was being charged with process crimes in petty retaliation.
The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn part 1 of 7
Playlist with all 7 parts
Lol , that's how you walk away with a busted lip. to both of you bitches..
Originally Posted By waterglass:
Trump mentions AntiFa insurrectionists in Speech in Az
A bit of analysis of the political religion of the left.
anecdotal wages of identity politics.
Make a play list, listen while you do other things.
Originally Posted By Markypie:
Good comeback! Good articles, also.
Originally Posted By waterglass:
Depends on what I plant in it.
Jordan B Peterson is a man you are apt to see a lot of in this thread. He is a clinical psychology professor. I will post the fundamentals of analytical psychologyas explained by the great minds of the field as the thread goes on.
Tacitus Annals 1-3
Publius (or Gaius) Cornelius Tacitus (/'tæs?t?s/; Classical Latin: ['tak?t?s]; 56 AD – 120 AD) was a senator and a historian of the Roman Empire. The surviving portions of his two major works—the Annals and the Histories—examine the reigns of the Roman emperors Tiberius, Claudius, Nero, and those who reigned in the Year of the Four Emperors (69 AD). These two works span the history of the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus, in 14 AD, to the years of the First Jewish–Roman War, in 70 AD. There are substantial lacunae in the surviving texts, including a gap in the Annals that is four books long.
Publius (or Gaius) Cornelius Tacitus (/'tæs?t?s/; Classical Latin: ['tak?t?s]; c. 56 AD – c. 120 AD) was a senator and a historian of the Roman Empire.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus
Histories (Latin: Historiae) is a Roman historical chronicle by Tacitus. Written c. 100–110, it covers the Year of Four Emperors following the downfall of Nero, as well as the period between the rise of the Flavian Dynasty (69–96) under Vespasian and the death of Domitian.
Together, the Histories and the Annals amounted to 30 books. Saint Jerome refers to these books explicitly, and about half of them have survived. Although scholars disagree on how to assign the books to each work, traditionally, fourteen are assigned to Histories and sixteen to the Annals. Tacitus' friend Pliny the Younger referred to "your histories" when writing to Tacitus about the earlier work.
By the time Tacitus had completed the Histories, it covered Roman history from AD 69, following Nero's death, to AD 96, the end of Domitian's reign. The Annals deals with the five decades before Nero, from AD 14, the reign of Tiberius, to AD 68, when Nero died.
Herodotus (/h?'r?d?t?s/; Ancient Greek: ???d?t??, Hêródotos, Attic Greek pronunciation: [h??.ró.do.tos]) was a Greek historian who was born in Halicarnassus in the Persian Empire (modern-day Bodrum, Turkey) and lived in the fifth century BC (c. 484–c. 425 BC), a contemporary of Thucydides, Socrates, and Euripides. He is often referred to as "The Father of History", a title first conferred by Cicero; he was the first historian known to have broken from Homeric tradition to treat historical subjects as a method of investigation—specifically, by collecting his materials systematically and critically, and then arranging them into a historiographic narrative.
The Histories (Greek: ?st???a?; Ancient Greek: [his.to.rí.ai?]; also known as The History) of Herodotus is now considered the founding work of history in Western literature. Written in 440 BC in the Ionic dialect of classical Greek, The Histories serves as a record of the ancient traditions, politics, geography, and clashes of various cultures that were known in Western Asia, Northern Africa and Greece at that time. Although not a fully impartial record, it remains one of the West's most important sources regarding these affairs. Moreover, it established the genre and study of history in the Western world (despite the existence of historical records and chronicles beforehand).
The Federalist papers Play list
The anti federalist papers full play list
The Federalist (later known as The Federalist Papers) is a collection of 85 articles and essays written (under the pseudonym Publius) by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay promoting the ratification of the United States Constitution. Seventy-seven were published serially in the Independent Journal and the New York Packet between October 1787 and August 1788. A compilation of these and eight others, called The Federalist: A Collection of Essays, Written in Favour of the New Constitution, as Agreed upon by the Federal Convention, September 17, 1787, was published in two volumes in 1788 by J. and A. McLean. The collection's original title was The Federalist; the title The Federalist Papers did not emerge until the 20th century.
The Anti-Federalist Papers is the collective name given to works written by the Founding Fathers who were opposed to or concerned with the merits of the United States Constitution of 1787. Starting on 25 September 1787 (8 days after the final draft of the US Constitution) and running through the early 1790s, these anti-Federalists published a series of essays arguing against a stronger and more energetic union as embodied in the new Constitution. Although less influential than their written counterparts, The Federalist Papers, these works nonetheless played an important role in shaping the early American political landscape and in the passage of the US Bill of Rights.
Capital Karl Marx
Karl Marx (/m??rks/; German: ['ka??l 'ma??ks]; 5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) was a Prussian-born philosopher, economist, political theorist, sociologist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. Born in Trier to a middle-class family, he later studied political economy and Hegelian philosophy. As an adult, Marx became stateless and spent much of his life in London, England, where he continued to develop his thought in collaboration with German thinker Friedrich Engels and published various works, the most well-known being the 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto. His work has since influenced subsequent intellectual, economic, and political historyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
Das KapitalMarx proposes that the motivating force of capitalism is in the exploitation of labour, whose unpaid work is the ultimate source of surplus value. The owner of the means of production is able to claim the right to this surplus value because he or she is legally protected by the ruling regime, through property rights. (The historical section shows how these rights were acquired in the first place chiefly through plunder and conquest and the activity of the merchant and "middle-man".) In producing capital (produced goods), the workers continually reproduce the economic conditions by which they labour. Capital proposes an explanation of the "laws of motion" of the capitalist economic system, from its origins to its future, by describing the dynamics of the accumulation of capital, the growth of wage labour, the transformation of the workplace, the concentration of capital, commercial competition, the banking system, the decline of the profit rate, land-rents, et cetera.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital:_Critique_of_Political_Economy
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (/'ni?t??/ German: ['f?i?d??ç 'v?lh?lm 'ni?t??] (About this sound listen); 15 October 1844 – 25 August 1900) was a German philosopher, cultural critic, poet, philologist, and Latin and Greek scholar whose work has exerted a profound influence on Western philosophy and modern intellectual history. He began his career as a classical philologist before turning to philosophy. He became the youngest ever to hold the Chair of Classical Philology at the University of Basel in 1869, at the age of 24. He resigned in 1879 due to health problems that plagued him most of his life, and he completed much of his core writing in the following decade. In 1889, at age 44, he suffered a collapse and a complete loss of his mental faculties. He lived his remaining years in the care of his mother until her death in 1897, and then with his sister Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche, and died in 1900.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche accuses past philosophers of lacking critical sense and blindly accepting dogmatic premises in their consideration of morality. Specifically, he accuses them of founding grand metaphysical systems upon the faith that the good man is the opposite of the evil man, rather than just a different expression of the same basic impulses that find more direct expression in the evil man. The work moves into the realm "beyond good and evil" in the sense of leaving behind the traditional morality which Nietzsche subjects to a destructive critique in favour of what he regards as an affirmative approach that fearlessly confronts the perspectival nature of knowledge and the perilous condition of the modern individual.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_Good_and_Evil
Ecce Homo: How One Becomes What One Is (German: Ecce homo: Wie man wird, was man ist) is the last original book written by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche before his final years of insanity that lasted until his death in 1900. It was written in 1888 and was not published until 1908.
According to one of Nietzsche's most prominent English translators, Walter Kaufmann, the book offers "Nietzsche's own interpretation of his development, his works, and his significance." The book contains several chapters with ironic self-laudatory titles, such as "Why I Am So Wise", "Why I Am So Clever", "Why I Write Such Good Books" and "Why I Am a Destiny". Walter Kaufmann, in his biography Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist noticed the internal parallels, in form and language, to Plato's Apology which documented the Trial of Socrates. In effect, Nietzsche was putting himself on trial with this work, and his sardonic judgments and chapter headings are mordant, mocking, self-deprecating, sly, and they turn this trial against his future accusers, distorters, and superficial judges
this book is excellent and easily digested. Ann Coulter goes into minute detail on illegal immigration and social engineering and the use of foreigners to supplant native populations as discussed in the Prince during the time of the Medici.
>>Hillary's IT specialist, u/stonetear, was caught asking how to destroy evidence on Reddit. The Department of Justice gave him transactional immunity, and no one was ever prosecuted
>>Chicago: Uber passenger jumped from moving car after Muslim driver demanded she pay with sexhttps://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/08/chicago-uber-passenger-jumped-from-moving-car-after-muslim-driver-demanded-she-pay-with-sex
Clicks spoiler to read excerptClick To View Spoiler
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
>>Mitch McConnell Approval Rating Sinks to 18% in Kentucky… Where Trump has 60% Approval gateway pundit (pundits aint people)
>>BOMBSHELL: Schultz IT Aide May Have Sold State Secrets to Russia, Pakistan (hannity.com)
If I may add some myself
This video is a must watch/listen. You think I'm kidding, but you'll be amazed at the parallels that hold true over 50 years later.
A fantastic red pill on Islam, with some facts you may not know.
Philip Haney worked counter-terrorism under the Obama admin. He wrote a best seller with a simple premise: the previous administration refused to investigate anything that could be remotely un-PC.
Remember how many terrorists seemed to go to the same mosques? You'd think the Feds would have ID'd - or at least discouraged - those secondary terrorists. But Obama refused to investigate individual mosques (though he had NO problem spying on Fox News reporters or militia groups -go figure) because it would be "Islamophobic."
I very much approve FDE.
Please add as you like but lets treat this thread as a repository of easy to access knowledge fundamental to understanding history and humanity .
Jefferson espouses the libertine ideal that all actions of external man must e driven by natural motives and not be interfered with by religious irrationality and idolations of flattery. Jefferson founds a nation of the basal ideals that Got Socrates murdered by a cup of hemlock.
Originally, Baptists supported separation of church and state in England and America. Some important Baptist figures in the struggle were John Smyth, Thomas Helwys, Edward Wightman, Leonard Busher, Roger Williams (who was a Baptist for a short period but became a "Seeker"), John Clarke, Isaac Backus, and John Leland.
In 1612 John Smyth wrote, "the magistrate is not by virtue of his office to meddle with religion, or matters of conscience". That same year, Thomas Helwys wrote that the King of England could "command what of man he will, and we are to obey it," but, concerning the church — "with this Kingdom, our lord the King hath nothing to do." In 1614, Leonard Busher wrote what is believed to be the earliest Baptist treatise dealing exclusively with the subject of religious liberty.
Counter-protester who allegedly 'sucker-punched' (BLACK!) Trump supporter at O.C. rally tried to flee state, police say
LA times does not mention the race of the Assault Victim or the Attacker overtly. The Victim was a native.. The Attacker was a white male from Ohio.. Wonder who paid for that trip?
20-year-old Ohio man was arrested Tuesday on suspicion of battery after he allegedly “sucker-punched” a Trump supporter at an anti-illegal immigration rally in Laguna Beach on Sunday, police said.
Richard Losey was arrested on suspicion of misdemeanor battery with a hate-crime enhancement, according to the Laguna Beach Police Department. He was being held in lieu of $50,000 bail.
Great job OP.
Tag for interests.
Tag for later
This could be the most interesting and educational thread to date. My contribution...
Thank you muh man.
Originally Posted By Thuban:
This could be the most interesting and educational thread to date. My contribution...
Gonna keep it up until they ban me for having a memory of over the legal capacity for a pleb.
Todays rush Limbaugh Show with Guest host Mark Goebbels is great. the first half an hour had me plum fuzzy. It is a godlike production from Adolf to OMG, beginning to end. Most illuminating! Tehee!
>>Barcelona Attack Mastermind Was Supposed to Be Deported but judge blocked it (breitbart.com)
>>Military Transgender Ban to Begin Within 6 Months. The guidelines direct the Pentagon to cease paying related medical bills for transgender men and women currently serving and to deny enlistment to transgender men and women in the future.(huffingtonpost.ca)
>>Flashback (One Year Ago, Published: 08:44 EDT, 23 August 2016) : FBI files linking Hillary Clinton to the 'suicide' of Vince Foster vanish from the National Archives(dailymail.co.uk)
In this 40 minute video Dinesh D'Souza exposes the Left's "big lie" about Charlottesville, Antifa, & Black Lives Matter. (protip: To open it into another window and listen while you serf the web click on the youtube icon on the lower right and it will open the video in a new window. Though It is easier just to open a new page in GD while it plays in this one.)
I haz meemz. Reel meemz. feelz Good man.
Originally Posted By natew73:
I know 2016 Ventura is like a turd in a flipflop but this dialogue is an example of a righteous man running into the REEEEE/Normie/thot normative bias. Video is 18 minutes of why everyone hates Jesse V. and it is totally believable that Chris Kyle fought of 100 Taliban because goats being rodeoed, After Hasidic Tom Hardy Punched the Minisoda Rex in the chops..
>>. Poll Has Sen. Jeff Flake Trailing GOP Primary Challenger By 14 Points(townhall.com)
Some philological allegories.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered ... Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” ? George Orwell, 1984
Nineteen Eighty-Four, often published as 1984, is a dystopian novel published in 1949 by English author George Orwell. The novel is set in Airstrip One (formerly known as Great Britain), a province of the superstate Oceania in a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance, and public manipulation. The superstate and its residents are dictated to by a political regime euphemistically named English Socialism, shortened to "Ingsoc" in Newspeak, the government's invented language. The superstate is under the control of the privileged elite of the Inner Party, a party and government that persecutes individualism and independent thinking as "thoughtcrime", which is enforced by the "Thought Police"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four
Fahrenheit 451 is a dystopian novel by American writer Ray Bradbury, published in 1953. It is regarded as one of his best works. The novel presents a future American society where books are outlawed and "firemen" burn any that are found. The book's tagline explains the title: "Fahrenheit 451 – the temperature at which book paper catches fire, and burns..." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_451
It was a pleasure to burn.
Stuff your eyes with wonder, he said, live as if you'd drop dead in ten seconds. See the world. It's more fantastic than any dream made or paid for in factories.
You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.
Brave New World is a novel written in 1931 by Aldous Huxley, and published in 1932. Set in London in the year AD 2540 (632 A.F.—"After Ford"—in the book), the novel anticipates developments in reproductive technology, sleep-learning, psychological manipulation, and classical conditioning that are combined to profoundly change society. Huxley answered this book with a reassessment in an essay, Brave New World Revisited (1958), and with Island (1962), his final novel.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_New_World
“Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the overcompensations for misery. And, of course, stability isn't nearly so spectacular as instability. And being contented has none of the glamour of a good fight against misfortune, none of the picturesqueness of a struggle with temptation, or a fatal overthrow by passion or doubt. Happiness is never grand.” -Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
>>Trump Administration ends visas to 4 African countries until they take back their illegal immigrants(breitbart.com)
>>Press Briefing with Press Secretary Sarah Sanders 08/24/2017[/b
>>The feminist woman mayor of Barcelona is laughing at the funeral of the 15 victims killed by muslims in the Barcelona attack, as mentioned above a judge allowed the mastermind for this attack to remain in the country.
>> Former Secret Service agent, Dan Bongino called Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) an “upper-crust, bow tie-wearing, foie gras-eating insider swamp monster"!(thehill.com)
>> Ackers v. Brazile. HRC, DWS, TWC, Podesta among other people and organizations named in lawsuit.
(imgur link to scan copy of court documents)
the best Pod Cast in The universe. these guys are legit. the first hour is usually gold. I have not listened yet.
[b]No Agenda is a podcast hosted by Adam Curry and John C. Dvorak and takes place twice a week on Thursday and Sunday mornings. The show is a conversation on recent news and media memes.
The show has no advertisers, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Agenda
>>Alarmed Pakistan Says It Will Work with Trump to End War in Afghanistan (breitbart.com)
Click spoiler to read excerpt
Click To View Spoiler
he Pakistani government, facing pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump to stop supporting jihadists fighting and killing American troops in Afghanistan, intends to closely collaborate with the United States to end to 16-year-old war, according to Islamabad’s ambassador to the United States.
In an interview with USA Today, Pakistani Amb. Aizaz Chaudhry noted that Islamabad would help promote peace talks between the U.S.-backed Afghan government and the Taliban terrorist group “in whatever manner it can.”
The envoy indicated that “Pakistan would use its considerable influence over the Taliban to prod the insurgent group to the negotiation table,” reports USA Today.
However, Pakistan has urged the United States to combat Islamic terrorist sanctuaries in neighboring Afghanistan. Both Pakistan and Afghanistan have long accused one another of harboring jihadists.
“We would like to see effective and immediate U.S. military efforts to eliminate sanctuaries harboring terrorists and miscreants on Afghan soil, including those responsible for fomenting terror in Pakistan,” said the office of Pakistan’s temporary Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi after a meeting with civilian and military leadership.
“The statement referred not only to the Afghan Taliban, but also the loosely affiliated Pakistani Taliban that Islamabad contends uses sanctuaries inside Afghanistan to plan attacks on Pakistani soil,” notes Reuters.
While the Afghan Taliban focuses on attacking U.S. and local trooops in Afghanistan, the Pakistani branch—Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP)—is focused on overthrowing the Pakistani government. Both groups are led by different leaders and consider themselves different organizations.
According to the U.S. military, the Afghanistan-Pakistan region is home to the largest concentration of jihadist groups—20 Islamic terrorist organizations.
In his televised speech Monday announcing a new strategy to end the war in Afghanistan that began in October 2001, Trump said, “We can no longer be silent about Pakistan’s safe havens for terrorist organizations, the Taliban, and other groups that pose a threat to the region and beyond. Pakistan has much to gain from partnering with our effort in Afghanistan. It has much to lose by continuing to harbor criminals and terrorists.”
“Pakistan has also sheltered the same organizations that try every single day to kill our people,” he added.”We have been paying Pakistan billions and billions of dollars at the same time they are housing the very terrorists that we are fighting. But that will have to change, and that will change immediately.”
The Pentagon has long accused Pakistan of providing sanctuary to terrorist groups operating in Afghanistan, a claim that Islamabad denies.
Pakistani officials have denounced the president’s speech for admonishing Islamabad.
“Civilian and military authorities in Pakistan have reacted angrily to U.S. President Donald Trump’s accusations that Islamabad provides safe havens for terrorists operating in Afghanistan,” reports Defense News.
“As a matter of policy, Pakistan does not allow use of its territory against any country. Instead of relying on the false narrative of safe havens, the U.S. needs to work with Pakistan to eradicate terrorism,” declared Pakistan’s Foreign Office in a statement.
In response to Trump’s remarks, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif said the United States must not use Pakistan as a “scapegoat” for its failures in Afghanistan.
According to Pakistan, it has suffered at least 70,000 casualties in terrorist attacks, including 17,000 fatalities, since it joined the U.S. “war on terrorism” after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the American homeland.
“We feel the American administration led by Mr Trump has been totally one sided, unfair to Pakistan and does not appreciate and recognize Pakistan has been a pivotal player,” Pakistani Sen. Mushahid Hussain, chairman of the senate defense committee, told Reuters.
The Trump administration has decided to withhold from Pakistan $50 million in outstanding fiscal year 2016 military reimbursements over Islamabad’s support for terrorist groups, particularly the Taliban and its ally the Haqqani Network, considered the top threat facing the United States in Afghanistan.
At the end of his administration, former President Barack Obama withheld $300 million from Pakistan over the same reasons.
The United States has funded Pakistan to the tune of about $2.1 billion each year since the war in Afghanistan started in October 2001.
Pakistan received about $30 billion from the United States in the first 14 years of the ongoing Afghanistan war, according to the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2015
>>The Corrupt Dictator Jerry Brown Signs Bill that prevents a recall election of one of their own senate democrats after signatures were gathered and verified(mercedsunstar.com)
>> Buckingham Palace in London on lockdown as police arrest man after two officers are 'attacked with a sword' in front of terrified tourists (((UNCLEAR MOTIVES))) (dailymail.co.uk)
>>‘Terror attack’ in Brussels: Machete-waving ‘terrorist’ is shot dead as he attacks soldiers shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ near street where ISIS called for vehicle attacks Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4824244/Machete-wielding-man-shot-dead-Brussels.html#ixzz4qohb6Gu7
Yep, this is a Tag
Need moar Sherriff Joe, W-G...
Peter Smith was talking to people who could get the 30,000 deleted HRC emails according to a Wall Street Journal interview he gave 5-4-17.
Smith then killed himself in Minnesota on 5-14-17, 10 days after The WSJ interview.
(A Plaintiff of the DNC fraud case had her home broken into in Minnesota and a computer was destroyed 6-3-17. She lives 150 miles from where Smiths was found dead 2 weeks prior. Shawn Lucas, who died 8-2-16, about two weeks after serving the DNC(7-22-16) with the Beck civil fraud suit in a viral video, is/was a co plaintiff.)
Joseph Rago, 34, An editorial Writer forThe Wall Street Journal was found dead in his home 7-20-17. )
(6-24-17) Beranton Whisenant, A federal prosecutor, was found dead on a beach in Broward County washed up by the tide with fatal wounds to the back of his head. (update) death Ruled suicide same as Smith, Rago and Eberwein
The lawyers Jared and Elizabeth Beck representing the plaintiffs of the DNC Fraud suit are based about 5 miles from where a Haitian national Klaus Eberwein Killed himself (7-11-17) days before testifying before the Senate about Clinton Global Incs theft of 5.4 billion dollars of relief money after the Earth Quake there.
Click the spoilers to get links and read the stories.
Peter Smith, Who had supposedly found access to the missing 33,000 emails died May 14th 2017, about 150 miles from the home of a plaintiff that would have a computer destroyed on June 3rd (according to the plaintiff). Update Smith was interviewed By the Wall Street Journal on the 10th of May, and Joseph Rago, Conservative editorial writer of the Wall Street Journal, age 34, found dead in his home July 20th 2017. Rago story below in next post.
Click To View Spoiler
A major story that has some readers scratching their heads recently surfaced regarding the death of a GOP operative and Hillary Clinton’s emails. According to The Blaze, “The Chicago Tribune has reported that Peter W. Smith, who was attempting to obtain 33,000 deleted Hillary Clinton emails from hackers who claimed to have them, committed suicide ten days after contacting the Wall Street Journal.”
Smith told the Wall Street Journal that he had made contact with several hackers on the “dark net,” who claimed they could produce the storied 33,000 deleted emails from Hillary Clinton’s servers. The police are calling it a suicide, but the timing of the death opens up questions and many conspiracy theories. With a suicide note that read “No foul play whatsoever” and “recent bad turn in health since January 2017” many believe that it sounds like a staged death. The method of death was also bizarre, described as “asphyxiation due to displacement of oxygen in confined space with helium.”
It is unfortunate that we live in an atmosphere where we immediately question the death of someone when the story involves the Clintons, the DNC or her emails, but it is becoming more and more suspicious when each time something happens it turns deadly. If it was indeed foul play, what could be on those emails that were so perfectly deleted and “bleach-bit” from her server? What could be in them that was so dangerous no one should ever see them? It makes one wonder and no doubt question the motive behind this mans death.
Clinton Foundation witness Klaus Eberwein found dead Jully 11th 2017, about 5-7 miles from headquarters of Law firm doing the DNC fraud case.
Click To View Spoiler
Haitian official was to testify next week on misappropriation charge
WASHINGTON — Klaus Eberwein, a former Haitian government official who was expected to testify against alleged Clinton Foundation corruption and malpractice next week, has been found dead in Miami via gunshot wound to the head.
The death was ruled a suicide. Eberwein was 50 and reportedly told acquaintances he feared for his life for his fierce criticism of the Clinton Foundation.
How many people do YOU know who have died mysteriously? Not as many as the Clintons! Check out WND’s explosive report, “‘Clinton death list’: 33 spine-tingling cases.”
Eberwein was due to appear next Tuesday before the Haitian Senate Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission where he was widely expected to testify that the Clinton Foundation misappropriated Haiti earthquake donations from international donors.
He had served as director general of the Haitian government’s economic development agency, Fonds d’assistance économique et social, for three years.
According to Eberwein, a paltry 0.6 percent of donations granted by international donors to the Clinton Foundation with the express purpose of directly assisting Haitians actually ended up in the hands of Haitian organizations. A further 9.6 percent ended up with the Haitian government. The remaining 89.8 percent – or $5.4 billion – was funneled to non-Haitian organizations.
“The Clinton Foundation, they are criminals, they are thieves, they are liars, they are a disgrace,” Eberwein said at a protest outside the Clinton Foundation headquarters in Manhattan last year.
Now more than ever, Bill and Hill are “Partners in Crime.” Jerome Corsi reveals “The Clintons’ scheme to monetize the White House for personal profit.”
According to the Haiti Libre newspaper, Eberwein was said to be in “good spirits,” with plans for the future. His close friends and business partners are shocked by the idea he may have committed suicide.
“It’s really shocking,” said friend Gilbert Bailly. “We grew up together; he was like family.”
The Haitian government issued an official notice thanking Eberwein for his service and mourning his untimely death.
Plaintiffs File Motion for Protection in DNC Fraud Lawsuit, which was denied.
Click To View Spoiler
Images of court documents and other stuff at link:https://medium.com/@zachhaller/plaintiffs-file-motion-for-protection-in-dnc-fraud-lawsuit-9f1845ab0593
On Tuesday, June 13, 2017, lawyers for the plaintiffs in the DNC fraud lawsuit filed a Motion for Order of Protection to the U.S. District Court in Florida following three disturbing incidents that recently occurred in orbit of the lawyers and plaintiffs involved in the ongoing, high-stakes litigation.
The lawsuit, a class action filed by Jared Beck and Elizabeth Lee Beck last summer, seeks damages for Democratic Party donors and voters duped by the party’s fraudulent 2016 primary. Counsel for the Democrats argued on April 25, 2017 in favor of their Motion to Dismiss, insisting that Federal Judge William J. Zloch throw out the case because the Party has the right to choose its nominee behind closed doors, in smoke-filled rooms, regardless of the results of primary contests.
In addition to the Party, the lawsuit names disgraced former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz as a Defendant. Following her resignation as DNC chair, Schultz has been the subject of intensifying scrutiny related to this lawsuit and another blasting the DNC’s grotesque compensation practices under her leadership. D.C. Capitol Police are also investigating a massive data breach committed by her former IT staffers, who have since fled the country. Meanwhile, uncertainty lingers as the homicides of DNC data director and potential witness Seth Rich, and Miami Federal Prosecutor Bheranton J. Whisenant Jr. remain unsolved.
The Events of June 1
On Thursday, June 1, approximately six weeks following the release of transcripts from the oral arguments, a staff member at Plaintiffs’ firm Beck & Lee received a mysterious call that was programmed to falsely identify on caller-ID as the contact number of Wasserman Schultz’s local office. The caller sought information related to the case using a voice-altering application, and would refuse to disclose his or her identity.
Notice of Filing E-Mail
Though the nature of the conversation seemed casual, the call was subsequently reported to the Court by Plaintiff’s attorney Elizabeth Lee Beck that day, in order to document potentially unsolicited contact from the Defendant. At that time, it would remain to be seen if Wasserman Schultz’ office would confirm or deny the call originated from their office as the number appearing on caller ID appeared to indicate.
The Events of June 2
Wasserman Schultz’s office responded to the report promptly to advise the Court that the office number identified on the call was from a former office location no longer in use by the Congresswoman, and advised that the call “[did] not appear” to have originated with “that office”. The Democrats and Wasserman Schultz’s counsel would advise that “no one on Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz’s staff, including the Congresswoman herself, has any knowledge of any such call being made, nor was any such call authorized”, (emphasis added).
While the particular wording of the statement did not unequivocally deny the call may have originated from within Wasserman Schultz’s network, counsel for the incumbent Florida lawmaker added that they were “very concerned” to hear of what must have been a spoofed call, and alerted D.C. Capitol Police as a precaution given the Congresswoman continues to serve in the House representing Florida’s 23th congressional district.
Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ June 1, 2017 Notice
Over the course of June 2, attorney Cullin O’Brien, who represents the Plaintiffs along with the Becks, would himself receive three mysterious calls, each from an unidentified number. In the first, the caller introduced himself as “Chris”, before asking for O’Brien by name, and if O’Brien was working on the “DNC Fraud Lawsuit”. O’Brien requested the caller put all communication in writing, and the caller hung up.
20 minutes later, O’Brien received another call, and identified the caller as “Chris” again by voice. This time, a series of threatening rants ensued in which the anonymous caller made reference to the recent murder of Miami U.S. Attorney and Federal Prosecutor Bheranton J. Whisenant Jr., and threatened that “this is bigger than you and your family and your law partners,” and he would “play the law firms off each other.”
A third call would come in that night from another unknown number that Mr. O’Brien would not answer. The caller, presumed the same as the two previous calls, left a 4-minute voice message. The message was sealed and submitted to the Court as evidence in connection with the Motion for Order of Protection.
Beyond Mr. O’Brien’s calls Friday, that very evening the same Beck & Lee employee who answered the June 1 call received a visit to her home by an unidentified, unknown visitor, asking for the employee by name. Her mother would answer the door to inform the visitor that the employee, who wishes to remain anonymous, was not at home. The visitor then left a Florida Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee Vote-By-Mail Application to be given to the employee, soliciting her name and contact information, despite the employee not having or seeking any affiliation to the Democratic Party. According to the employee’s mother, the visitor carried a stack of these flyers, but drove away without visiting any other residents on the street.
The Events of June 3
While the events of June 1 and 2 occurred near Miami, Florida where the lawsuit was filed, a third concerning event took place overnight in the town of Dassel, Minnesota, about 50 miles west of Minneapolis in central Minnesota.
On Saturday morning June 3, Angela Monson, one of the various Plaintiffs named in the lawsuit and an active member in her local Democratic party, awoke around 5:45am and sought to use her personal laptop computer. After noticing her device was not in the entryway where she last left it, Monson found her laptop in the living room, eerily placed on an end table in comfortable reach for only a right-handed person. Monson, who lives with mild cerebral palsy, has limited use of her right hand, and is exclusively left-handed.
Upon recovering her laptop, Monson noticed the device had been tampered with: according to the affidavit submitted to the court, when she tried to boot up the computer, it made a snapping noise, and did not turn on.
In examining the defective and misplaced device, Monson turned it over, and the back plate snapped off. Noticing the 10 screws holding the hardware together were missing, Monson checked with her sons to be sure neither tampered with the device. Upon hearing neither had, an alarmed Monson realized an intruder must have entered, presumably overnight.
Monson would inspect her home to find a patio door left ajar approximately 3 inches, and another door mysteriously unlocked. Law enforcement who arrived on the scene discovered a third connecting door unlocked as well, unveiling the entry path of an intruder who appeared to have broken into the house, tampered with the laptop til it no longer functioned, and retreated without looting or damaging the home or property in any other way.
Exhibit 5 to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order of Protection and Request for Hearing
The O’Brien calls, the employee’s visit and literature drop, and the Plaintiff’s home invasion are each alarming in and of themselves, but the fact that each of these events took place less than 48 hours after the original mysterious June 1 call creates an even darker cloud over the ongoing litigation. While the threatening phone calls answered by Mr. O’Brien could have been coincidental harassment inflicted by any one of the millions of onlookers, the solicitation of the employee’s contact information via a Florida Democratic Party registration form and the breaking and entering of a Plaintiff’s home and ruination of her personal computer appear calculated and highly suspicious.
Since the galling and irreversibly damning oral arguments thrust the utter depravity of the Democratic Party and its contempt of its members into the public consciousness, attorneys Jared Beck, Elizabeth Lee Beck, Cullin O’Brien, and others defending the merits of the lawsuit have already been subjected to constant badgering across social media platforms in defense of the corrupt establishment. The disturbing sequence of events detailed above, and in addition to the increased pressure on a Democratic Party incapacitated by massive ongoing scandals worsening by the day, all the more justify the Plaintiff’s attorneys Motion for Order of Protection to ensure safety and privacy for their staff, the plaintiffs, and key witnesses as the case inches toward its next step.
Following Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protection on Tuesday, June 13, counsel from the Democrats filed a Defendants’ Response to the Plaintiff’s Motion two days later on Thursday, June 15, seen below.
In their response, attorneys for the Democrats take no position to support or oppose the Plaintiff’s Motion for Order of Protection. Their icy retort not only notably lacks any measure of respect for the Democratic Party voters involved or concern for how the integrity of the legal process could be compromised by such harassment, but instead volunteers the below:
“To the extent that Plaintiffs seek to imply that the Defendants had some role in any of the incidents listed in their motion or had any other inappropriate contact with or harassment of anyone in any way in involved with this case, Defendants wish to make it clear that such an implication is patently false.”
Oddly, Plaintiff’s Motion did not make any implication or suggestion that the Defendants had any role in the disturbing occurrences that took place; the Motion for Protection simply provided the Court with documentation of the events that took place related to the parties involved in the suit. It is unclear why the Defendants’ response would include a preemptive denial, and noteworthy that this preemptive denial is worded in such absolute terms.
Awaiting an Order of Protection
Following the formal acknowledgement from the defendants related to the suspicious events described above and docketed with the Court, an anxious public will await the Court’s ruling on the Motion for Order of Protection that could come at any time. Judge William J. Zloch could approve, deny, or further inquire regarding the Motion; this Motion now takes precedence over the Judge’s current analysis of the merits of the Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit filed previously by the Democrats and argued in the court hearings taking place in late April, 2017.
While the mainstream media continues to downplay and dismiss the massive implications of a lawsuit that will have profound consequences on the voting behavior of over 300 million Americans of all party affiliations, a silent but unfathomably vast majority around the country and world will watch with bated breath as the all-powerful American Democratic Party and media fight tooth-and-nail in Court to delay its inevitable, impending, and tragic demise.
In their valiant and undaunted efforts to bring this suit to high Court where it stands, Elizabeth Lee Beck, Jared Beck, and Cullin O’Brien have already enshrined themselves in American and world history as new-age revolutionaries who have exposed the American Democratic Party for the wicked and unrelenting oligarchy it has become.
In spite of the best efforts of a war-hungry former President who seemed to do everything in his power to ensure the continuation of his odious legacy, Americans last November successfully blocked the Clinton Restoration.
With the heavy lifting behind them, this magisterial few who brought the suit to pass have not only vindicated 13 million disenfranchised progressives, but have already ensured that the rotting carcass of the Democratic Party will soon be turned to dust.
Wife of the attorney representing plaintiffs in the DNC fraud case can be seen here, feeling very afraid. She might be able to fake tears, but she couldn't fake the literal gut wrenching stress you can hear coming from her body involuntarily. You can hear her stomach turning inside her body. That woman is scared. From the stuff she said it would appear that Whisenant was investigating the smuggling of live organs from the Caribbean to the Jacksonville Mayo clinic. Shawn Lucas Who made The Famous Video of serving the DNC(7-22-16) with this fraud suit (he was named as a plaintiff as well), was found dead (8-2-16)
The first person she is talking about is Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. A federal prosecutor that was found dead in Broward county Florida in May. Whisenant appears to have been shot in the back of the head and thrown out of a boat at sea.
Here is a link.
Beranton J. Whisenant death ruled suicide.
Would you like to know more? Start read on page 15
VA Race Clash a CNN invention to move the Narrative From CIA crimes? (FAT BASTARD) Maybeh
Big Reddit Thread with lots of links.
Three people close To Julian Assange Died in 2016
Okay fellers it is Time line time for pro/anti Trump covert ops and DNC political assassinations.
From Reddit, My additions and emphasis in red.
Link Look for the thread with below info for live links.
I put together a timeline of DNC server "hack" and the attempts to set up both Trumps:
>>November, 2013: Trump is staying in the Moscow Ritz-Carlton, during the Miss Universe pageant. He appears in a music video with a Russian pop star: Emin Agalarov. Later:
A person with knowledge of the 2013 trip to Moscow said Emin Agalarov offered to send prostitutes to Trump’s hotel room, but the repeated offers were rejected by Keith Schiller, Trump’s longtime bodyguard.
>>Reminder: this is when Trump allegedly hired the "peeing prostitutes".
>>>March 19, 2016: John Podesta receives a phishing email purportedly from Google, telling him to change his password. After a staffer tells him it is "legitimate" (and subsequently claimed that was a typo), Podesta purportedly used it to change his password.
>>June 3, 2016: the same Emin Agalarov contacts Trump, Jr. through Rob Goldstone, promising compromising info on Clinton's campaign.
>>June 9, 2016: Trump, Jr. holds the meeting with an attorney connected with FusionGPS, but she instead tries to lobby against anti-Russian legislation (the Magnitsky Act).
>>June 12, 2016: Wikileaks announces they have "emails relating to Hillary Clinton" and will be publishing them soon.<< The Podesta Emails
>>June 14, 2016: DNC announces their server was "hacked" back in April, and the perpetrator stole "Trump opposition research".
>>June 15, 2016: DNC/Crowdstrike announces "it was the Russians!", with very thin evidence, some of which they subsequently retracted.
>June 15, 2016 (yes, the same day): Guccifier 2.0 appears, takes credit for the "hack" and sends the Trump opposition research to several media outlets. Documents appear to have "Russian fingerprints", but it's a sham.... the documents were first created by an English language user -- possibly in the office of a Democrat politician -- and then opened and saved again on a computer with Russian language settings, all within 30 minutes on 2016-06-15: http://g-2.space/
>>>Thoughts on Guccifer and other stuff not in the time line:
Click To View Spoiler
IT Is my Opinion that Guccifer 2 is part of a counter intel operation directed by FusionGPS or some other Post 9/11 private intel agency to get the FISA Warrant that allowed Barrack Obama's National security Counsel to spy on The Trump Campaign for the benefit of Hillary Clinton's Campaign. This was probably orchestrated by John Podesta and ex CIA. James Comey would have known the sources for the information making him suspect as well.
The DNC Got the FusionGPS piss dossier in mid June. Guccifer2 is blamed for the theft of that dossier within days of the DNC getting it, The Don Jr. FusionGPS connected Russian meeting in mid june, The Tea leaves spoofed Pings between a russian bank and Trump tower in mid june. These things collectively got the Warrant.
Here is an old pre election diagram that needs to be updated with the FusionGPS information and the time of the FISC Warrant in July... at the time this was made it was assumed mcCain supplied the Piss dossier to the FBI in October.
It does show the Tea leaves DNS spoof of Trump/Alpha Bank connections accurately..
My point is all of the stuff used to get the FISA warrant, seems to happen in the two week period in mid June when it becomes clear Trump will be the Republican Nominee, and it all seems to be tied to FusionGPS, Crowdstrike, and CIA people.
My opinion is Guccifer2 is a cut out for FusionGPS in June of 2016. FusionGPS is the go between for the Obama Admin and the Intel agencies. At this point Guccifer is being used to get the FISA Warrant.
>>July 5th James Comey Makes public statement concluding Clinton Server investigation
>>July 5, 2016: On that same day 3 weeks after DNC/Crowdstrike announces they were "hacked", And Seven Hours After James Comey's Public conclusion of the Clinton Ivestigation, a second set of files are copied onto a USB memory drive or over a local area network. File modification timestamps indicate it was probably done with Linux, and a copy speed of 22.6 megabytes/second -- too fast to be done remotely: https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
>>July 10th 2016: Seth Rich is Shot, 5 days after the second breech was mae.
>>July 22, 2016:17 days after the second DNC breech, Wikileaks starts to publish first batch DNC emails.
>>September 1, 2016: a second set of files (copied on 7/5) are repackaged into new archives, on a computer with US Eastern timezone settings[/u].
>>September 13, 2016: the New archives of that second set of files are released by Guccifer 2.0
>>Thoughts on the Gufficer2 september 13th leaks
Click To View Spoiler
Lets say Seth Rich Stole the DNC files on Jly 5th after Comey dropped the Investigation on Hillary Clinton. Lets assume Rich gave Some or all of what was stolen to wikileaks, and was then murdered before he could give more.
You would need to cover up that murder.
How would you do that?
This Release on the 13th of September of files taken July 5, May be fusionGPS/Crowdstrike covering the Tracks for the Murderer of Seth Rich using Guccifer 2.0 as a cutout again.
A fraction of what was taken on the 5th of July was leaked by Guccifer.
Proof of the Physical theft itself is on the DNC server. the size of the files taken and how long it took to put the files into memory sticks is embedded into he servers disk. Also, from where the info was taken is on the server, as well as the user ID that took it.
So by associating Gufficer 2 with the thefts of July fifth, using a set of spoofed files, you cover up the identity of the real thief. Also what was stolen is protected because the FBI never had access to the server. Only Crowdstrike did.
>>September, 2016: Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, says he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the (Podesta?) email sources in September.<<Those were probably the DNC Emails released a day or two before the election on November 6th.
>>October 10, 2016: Wikileaks starts to publish Podesta's emails, six months after he received the "change your password" phishing email.
>>November 6th releases the emails retrieved by Murray.
EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
click spoiler for more.
Click To View Spoiler
Note by waterglass: Click the links because information is conveyed in them in the picture attachments.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he flew to Washington, D.C. for emails
He claims he had a clandestine hand-off in a wooded area near American University with one of the email sources
The leakers' motivation was 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the 'tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders'
Murray says: 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks'
'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that,' Murray insists
Murray is a controversial figure who was relieved of his post as British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct but is close to Wikileaks
By Alana Goodman In Washington, Dc For Dailymail.com
Published: 15:33 EDT, 14 December 2016 | Updated: 18:01 EDT, 14 December 2016
A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence.
Craig Murray (left), former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange (right), told the Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September
Murray is a controversial figure who was removed from his post as a British ambassador amid allegations of misconduct. He was cleared of those but left the diplomatic service in acrimony.
His links to Wikileaks are well known and while his account is likely to be seen as both unprovable and possibly biased, it is also the first intervention by Wikileaks since reports surfaced last week that the CIA believed Russia hacked the Clinton emails to help hand the election to Donald Trump.
Murray's claims about the origins of the Clinton campaign emails comes as U.S. intelligence officials are increasingly confident that Russian hackers infiltrated both the Democratic National Committee and the email account of top Clinton aide John Podesta.
In Podesta's case, his account appeared to have been compromised through a basic 'phishing' scheme, the New York Times reported on Wednesday.
U.S. intelligence officials have reportedly told members of Congress during classified briefings that they believe Russians passed the documents on to Wikileaks as part of an influence operation to swing the election in favor of Donald Trump.
But Murray insisted that the DNC and Podesta emails published by Wikileaks did not come from the Russians, and were given to the whistleblowing group by Americans who had authorized access to the information.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' Murray said. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.'
Murray said he retrieved the package from a source during a clandestine meeting in a wooded area near American University, in northwest D.C. He said the individual he met with was not the original person who obtained the information, but an intermediary.
Murray claims he met with the person who passed the emails over in a Washington, D.C. part near American University
His account cannot be independently verified but is in line with previous statements by Wikileaks - which was the organization that published the Podesta and DNC emails.
Wikileaks published the DNC messages in July and the Podesta messages in October. The messages revealed efforts by some DNC officials to undermine the presidential campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders, who was running against Hillary Clinton.
Others revealed that Clinton aides were concerned about potential conflicts and mismanagement at the Clinton Foundation.
Murray declined to say where the sources worked and how they had access to the information, to shield their identities.
He suggested that Podesta's emails might be 'of legitimate interest to the security services' in the U.S., due to his communications with Saudi Arabia lobbyists and foreign officials.
Murray said he was speaking out due to claims from intelligence officials that Wikileaks was given the documents by Russian hackers as part of an effort to help Donald Trump win the U.S. presidential election.
'I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.'
Murray was a vocal critic of human rights abuses in Uzbekistan while serving as ambassador between 2002 and 2004, a stance that pitted him against the UK Foreign Office.
He describes himself as a 'close associate' of Julian Assange and has spoken out in support of the Wikileaks founder who has faced rape allegations and is currently confined to the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
Assange has similarly disputed that charges that Wikileaks received the leaked emails from Russian sources.
'The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything,' Assange told John Pilger during an interview in November.
'Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That's false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source.'
The Washington Post reported last Friday that U.S. intelligence agencies had 'identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails.'
The paper said U.S. senators were presented with information tying Russia to the leaks during a recent briefing by intelligence officials.
'It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia's goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,' a senior U.S. official familiar with the briefing told the Post. 'That's the consensus view.'
The paper said U.S. senators were presented with information tying Russia to the leaks during a recent briefing by intelligence officials.
'It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia's goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,' a senior U.S. official familiar with the briefing told the Post. 'That's the consensus view.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html#ixzz4nlihBq4J
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
A news story about the November 6th leaks That Murray smuggled to Assange written recently
New WikiLeaks emails show CNN, NBC and Washington Post worked with DNC to influence election
Click To View Spoiler
Over 8,000 emails released by WikiLeaks exposes the collusion between CNN and Washington Post with the DNC in hopes of influencing the election in Democratic favor.
? Don Trump Jr. emails show Hillary may have colluded with Russian Government
? Bernie Sanders criticizes Democratic party, says he'll work with Donald Trump
A new batch of over 8,000 emails exposed by WikiLeaks revealed that staffers from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) wrote questions for CNN news anchor Wolf Blitzer for when he interviewed then Presidential candidate Donald Trump. Emails dating as far back to 2015 show the mainstream media colluding with the DNC and Democratic candidates.
Among the 8,263 emails released by WikiLeaks, one shows staff working for the CNN network asking DNC staffers what questions they should quiz Republican candidates on, including Trump and Ted Cruz.
The emails make it clear the DNC was working in cahoots with CNN during the 2016 Presidential election. In a colluding effort to help Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton win over Trump, or possibly Cruz, CNN worked effortlessly with the Democratic party, the DNC, and staffers from the party to develop interviews with calculated questioning to make Republican candidates look poor in hopes of influencing the election.
An email dated April 28th entitled 'Cruz on CNN' reads: "CNN is looking for questions. Please sent some topical/interesting ones."
Another email asks if DNC staffers 'want to offer Jake Tapper questions to ask us' during another interview on the network. Tapper, who is a journalist for CNN, relentlessly pounded Trump with hard-hitting question throughout the election. It's now clear where he obtained his information from, who he was working for, and why he was doing it.
When a news outlet works hand-in-hand with a political party in hopes of influencing election results, that is the sign of democracy being replace with fascism. However, despite this overwhelming amount of evidence packed against CNN and the DNC, they both continue to mercilessly attack President Trump on what they call colluding with Russia during the campaign, of course, without a single iota of evidence. What there is evidence of is collusion between an American news outlet and a political party, and that's fascism. Yet will CNN spend 90 percent of it's air time reporting on an actual collusion? So far, they haven't spent a single second.
A Separate DNC email chain found appears to show Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank asking the DNC for help with research for a column The column he wrote was about Trump and featured a list of things the presidential candidate said that he deemed as 'outrageous'.
'Wolf Blitzer is interviewing Trump on Tues (sic) ahead of his foreign policy address on Wed,' DNC research director Lauren Dillon wrote in the email that was entitled 'CNN questions for Trump.' Numerous questions were submitted by a group of DNC staffers and officials for Blitzer to ask Trump.
In a separate conversation dated on April 28, Jason Seher, a writer for Jake Tapper's show on CNN, emailed Pablo Manriquez, a former DNC media booker thanking him for 'facilitating Luis coming on today, and bearing with us through a meelee (sic) of GOP nonsense and cancellations and all that. Any particular points he'll want to make? We're gonna stay Dem focused...'
The release also shows CNN asked for and received emails from DNC interim chairwoman Donna Brazile, who worked at the network as an on-air contributor, and leaked questions to the Clinton campaign for a debate and a town hall event.
But it wasn't just CNN and the Washington Post who colluded and worked with the DNC and Democratic Party. NBC News also dipped their hand in the honey pot, as an email from John Harwood, a chief journalist for CNBC, sent to John Podesta, head of staff for the Hillary Clinton campaign, asking for questions to ask Republican candidate Jeb Bush in an upcoming interview.
An email from NBC journalist John Harwood to John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign head of staff.
The emails reveal obvious collusion between CNN, NBC, and the Washington Post, and the DNC in an attempt to influence election results in a Democratic way. Through compiling information for articles, drafting interview questions, and carrying out a false narrative against Republican candidates, CNN and the Washington Post should be held accountable for their treason against the American people and democracy.
CNN said the emails being hacked should be "a lesson to journalists" about being more careful and preventing future hacks.
Washington Post's new slogan "Democracy dies in the darkness" seems to only apply to them and their fellow conspirators NBC and CNN in working against American democracy and it's sacred election.
comments by original author on reddit:
Click To View Spoiler
At some point during this timeline, Fusion GPS paid an ex-British spy to spread money around Moscow in exchange for tall tales. Keep in mind that he couldn't actually go there himself, as it would be too dangerous. So, he probably had to work through Russian sub-contractors. Both the "informants" and the sub-contractors had a financial incentive to tell him whatever he wanted to hear. And, it would have been trivial to buttress each other's stories to make it believable.
Think about it: if Russian intelligence actually had compromising information on Trump, it would have been a state secret and they would have never given it to someone else before they could use it themselves. But, given the opportunity to sow confusion and discord around even a "long shot" US Presidential candidate, they wouldn't have been able to resist. Since they had probably already tried to set up Trump during the pageant (for whatever reason), they already had the narrative ready.
Hopefully, this will help people connect the dots and offer the necessary evidence to prove the point.
If anyone is interested In helping out, look for connections between TeaLeaves, her 2 man front shop, and FusionGPS and its top people. the algos of google are protecting her by obfuscating her name and TeaLeaves.
If Seth Rick was murdered by interests serving the DNC, Here is my theory of events using the information available..
Click To View Spoiler
My working theory right now is Podesta Knew that Wikileaks had his emails since June of 2016.
Guccifer, TeaLeaves, The Piss dossier, The Russian Lawyers Meeting with Trump, and the April theft of DNC opo research were creations of FusionGPS with collaboration from Crowdstrike.
I think the April Hack was a FusionGPS creation from the start with collaboration from Crowdstrike.
I think it was a way to get Steeles dossier in the pipeline as evidence for the second FISA attempt by Obama.
Seth Rich Stole the emails July 5th after Comey dropped the server investigation. Rich gave some or all of them to someone who could get them to Assange between the 6th and the 9th, and was then shot late at night, early the next morning walking home after a hard night drinking.
Assange, realizing his source was murdered, Releases the DNC stuff from Rich starting on the 22nd of July 2016. They did a lot of damage.
To cover up the Murder of Rich, the Guccifer2 cut out is used to release a set of spoof files with the time stamp of 7/5 and everything else that would match up with the embed on the disk of the serve in early September, well after the Wikileaks dumps..
The September leaks by guccifer2 were not meant to hurt Clinton. And the didn't. Same goes for all earlier guccifer2 releases.
The Podesta Emails released by wikileaks On October 10th a full month later, and our Spy agencies would have known real time when Assange planned to release the emails, because his communications are tapped constantly. A good idea would be to see the difference from when the Billy Bush tape was leaked until wikileaks published.
The video was probably released within minutes of the time when Wikileaks committed to a publishing time for Podesta's emails.
His Lawyer, John Jones, 48, http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/renowned-lawyer-who-represented-julian-assange-died-after-being-struck-by-train-in-west-hampstead-1-4507283
Gavin MacFadyen, Lung Cancer, 76, Mentor and Defender
The Google Algos are making it very hard to find the source links to do this stuff now. I can not find the 3rd guy but he died of a heart attack in his early 60s if I recall correctly..
Here is another one from this year.
Eric Clanton, Your Average AntiFA
The media protects them. CNN openly sides with this shit. The Media called Trump A nazi all week long last week because he said guys like Clanton are are as bad as any NAZI, and that there were good protestors that were not People Like Clanton or Nazis at demonstrations to keep the historical statues.
He also said that the Antifa Assaulted people with alawful permit to protest and demonstrate against the removal of statues that were not related to the white nationalists that demostrated the day after the first pro statue demonstration.. AntiFA attacked both groups.
Here is a Video explaining the free speech protests, and the medias use of them as a heel to pit antifa against free speech, under the guise of suppressing NAZIS.
Some of Trumps comments can be seen here when he takes questions from the media.
Jacques Soustelle (3 February 1912 – 6 August 1990) was an important and early figure of the Free French Forces, an anthropologist specializing in Pre-Columbian civilizations, and vice-director of the Musée de l'Homme in Paris in 1939. Governor General of Algeria, he helped the rise of De Gaulle to the presidency of the Fifth Republic, but broke with De Gaulle over Algerian independence, joined the OAS is their efforts to overthrow De Gaulle and lived in exile between 1961 and 1968. On returning to France he resumed political and academic activity and was elected to the Académie française in 1983]