Quoted:
Quoted: Persoanlly, I'm surprised they haven't done it already. IMHO, they should seriously consider it. 123As are better performers than the N cells.
|
I think the only reason they haven't so far is it would require a redesign of the body to be a bit taller.
Molds cost $$.
|
Understood.
Still, they did add the AA models to the lineup a few years ago. I think, in the long run, it might be better to discontinue the "N" cell line for a new 123A line, as I'm sure a lot more compact models would be sold if that were the case; especially by those taking the optic into more harsh environments. It just adds another and a better choice for those who are using the optic for "real".
Having the sight be taller might not be a bad thing. If it were tall enough, then the Larue QD mount wouldn't be needed for a more uncluttered cowitness. I hope the fact that the larue mount has sold so well tells the people at EOTech that a lot of people prefer the cowitness in the lower third and not in the center. It would also be the cheaper solution for those who like the 1/3 cowtness and don't want to pay an extra hundred for a mount when there is aleready a perfectly good mount built into the optic.
The AA model can be kept for those who do like the irons in the center of the screen and for those who do like to use the QD and zero repeatable features of the Larue throw lever system to get 1/3 cowitness. I think a CR123 model would have a more unique niche over the AA model and both will have its own market. I think the advantage of the "N" cell model's compactness doesn't begin to outweighs the negatives of its battery choice.
The only other option would be for EOTech to get someone to develop a lithium N cell. Or perhaps we can hold out hope that someone will consider a lithium option for such a little used battery type. I understand that financial strain is always a big consideration, but I think this is an innovation that is needed for the compact EOTech line.