Lets see...  Background stars stationary.
Airplane moving left to right toward bottom part of video.

With those as background, there are three widely spaced points of light moving in perfect concert relative to each other and do not track at all with the background stars or the aircraft traveling below these lights.

Yet, NASA says "That is just how airliners fly in a major flight corridor, nothing to see here".   How was this leaked as UAP video when they have a cover story already prepared which would have taken it out of the UAP pool immediately based on radar tracks and nearby traffic.  Curious as to how they try to explain it in the coming while.  I haven't seen regular flights on ADSBExchange stop and reverse momentum or come to a standstill simultaneously, then start moving again just as instantly.  I'd at least expect some better BS regarding the lights.

All of them had it in their mission to release the public info they could about UFOs, but then internally the employees noted that exactly the opposite was happening, hence the resignations and "Whistleblower" legislation passed allowing more to come forward with minimal punishment (other than never getting to work in secret again or taking away flight wings and any of a umber of other bureaucratic BS Reasons to mess with lives).

I really like his analogy to our perception of reality being the same as our perception of a computer user interface.  No matter how hard we look at the pixels, we don't learn more about them.   If we  delve into the computer internals, even just a few layers of abstraction closer to the meal(CPU), there's a ton of processes running and memory going every which way and we don't know what it is doing.  Could be somebody switching video to watch to somebody installing new software or completely deleting something.    The "Reality" we live in is just that, the desktop User Interface model.   Trying to then talk about the API calls and Opersating System or even CPU Primitives called which result in that UI being coherent on the display which people need to make scene of what is going on (Unless you're a command line guy like me, but even then, tons of abstraction already there to make coding faster and more coherent and secure.   The hacks happen when people access that Deeper and less abstracted world going on behind the desktop that can make all sorts of impossible thing happen at the UI level and no matter how much you dig around in the UI with mouse and magnifying glass, you'll never figure it out.  

To see how it works, need to take not a step back, but a step in then get your bearings and repeat.  Start with UI API calls (Application Program Interface) which is how User Interfaces change a mouse click to something actually happening on the computer.  Once you know how the APIs work, and what does what, you can dig down to the OS code which provides those APIs (again, still abstractions to make coding easier to read and more coherent for multiple platforms).  At some level, unless you have a separate abstraction layer to put over the first (Example would be rooted OS on an otherwise stock Phone), you can do things and understand more than you Normally would, so long as you don't mind glitches happening now and again since the full abstraction sammich isn't accessible by all code the way it assumes it to be.

Until we start looking at what reality runs on, to even guess at the API calls, we're trying to look closer and closer at things that don't matter.  Things that don't matter to the point that it's ignored unless somebody is paying attention or using the output for something else (Explains Quantum Eraser / Delayed Quantum Choice Experiment), as wella s other quantum physics concepts.  They're wrapped around themselves so far trying to fit into our model what they're seeing at the muon level now that there is equipment that can measure that.  Instead, they should work outward through quantum Chemistry and other fields which are doing exactly this and starting with known experimental data and applying to it and save short circuit skips since they're not monitored anyway.

Ii is improving a tiny bit.  Now they admit people are lying a lot and then trying to lie about lying.  It'll be another while yet before we actually get to see what they were lying about.

I'd even accept a Blue stained Lewinski dress at this point rather than the "Did too!" "Did Not!" back and forth to where they're "Well, ok, sort of did.." but we don't know which things they're talking about.

I don't think that would be a mind changer for anybody considering how fucked up everything else is already.  Under 1% and under the typical margin of election win/loss.  

The bit I'm confused about is the people who are pushing for changes everywhere are Democrats and the people trying to stop them in most cases are Republican, in most simple definition though now both have same goals but different pathways to those goals.  This isn't politics forum, but my observations have been that the (D) people in congress are seeming to push the hardest for disclosure, while  (R) start out saying they will change things so that can happen suddenly stop once they get in office and apologize they don't have access or a way to do it.  So then the D make a lot of noise knowing it won't go anywhere while the R leave the sleeping dog lie until something can be arranged.

The bright side is the bills that have passed to allow the whistleblowers to come forward were voted passed by both sides so there's some common interests,  It's an overlapping Venn diagram, not two circles with no intersection.  The other side of same coin is the stigma of supporting disclosure and classified as loony bin from the majority which have been brought up with conventional wisdom of TV show writers and MSM propaganda anchors and don't question it, thinking they're never influenced although everything they care about is influenced...

It seems to be a .gov vs private sector vs national secrets sort of war, so some aspects are military, some aspects are worrying about scaring Everybody to suicide or other insane lifestyle switch, part of it is political to agree with treaties made with other countries regarding these materials so it is literally a minefield that has to be danced through and full disclosure can't really happen without severely upsetting some of those agreements.   It would seem the biggest block right now is the US.gov does not have access to all the materials and technology that US Aerospace companies have.   The argument we are seeing may be related to that knowledge gap to at least get one security classification system standard rather than private companies keeping company secrets with death penalties.   Some of those agreements were made back in early cold war and not much thought of.   Similar to Bill Gates adding to his contract with writing IBM DOS as long as he could keep a copy of IP and market MS-DOS himself under a different name.  One little early contract like that can snowball into unimaginable territory decades later.

TL;DR - No major impact when it comes to national elections from how I see things as both parties have been for it though both parties hit a wall regarding it, even President of D or R

I'm not sure.  Nukes are monitored by Department of Energy and they have the clearance of TS/SAP in the right department.  The side that deals with climate change isn't the same group in the DoE that plans routes for moving a warhead.

As far as mixing up quotes and injecting BS, that's like what the media does.

dbltap

< -- edited by brass -- >


--ETA:

That last line of Reddit article:



I'm curious how many have vanished.  It seems once you get too a certain level of notoriety, you're safe, but when you're still in the dozens to hundreds of contacts is where the big danger is.  Set it up to go big with as much info as you can or don't even mumble about it.