User Panel
Posted: 4/7/2023 10:36:58 PM EDT
So a little back story here, my sister is cleaning herself up (making better choices we’ll say). She doesn’t have a criminal record or anything like that. She recently got an apartment in a not so good part of town. My mom was wanting to buy her a handgun as a home warning gift. Could she legally buy from an online retailer, ship to an FFL and my sister do the paperwork, pay the fee, and take possession?
|
|
Yes. Be another good idea to get her some quality training - which could be as expensive as a new gun.
|
|
A lot of FFLs won't do that. Name of purchaser not matching who is coming to pick it up tends to be a red flag for them.
|
|
|
I don't know about various different laws - but in Texas I think it is legal within family. Gifts are, being repaid for a gift is iffy, maybe. But I know people who have bought guns for family this way at gun shows - where the relatives would have needed to drive 100's of miles and the gun would no longer be available.
|
|
|
Sounds like a gift. Gifts are good.
What would be a straw is when the purchaser papers the transaction to conceal the actual recipient. |
|
As far as I know, it's only a straw purchase if the ultimate possessor is a prohibited person.
BTW - I don't necessarily, from a fundamental 2A standpoint, agree with it. That is just my understanding of the rules. |
|
As an FFL,
Whoever's name is on the order slip is who needs to pick it up. She can legally buy for her child as long as she has no knowledge of any disqualifiers that would not allow them to own one. Easiest would be to do do the ship to / billing separate. Ship to your sisters name. Billing info your moms so card works. (Or you can try using your sisters name (If last name same, in billing also, most cards will let it go through). |
|
Quoted: As far as I know, it's only a straw purchase if the ultimate possessor is a prohibited person. BTW - I don't necessarily, from a fundamental 2A standpoint, agree with it. That is just my understanding of the rules. View Quote No, It is a straw purchase if the intent to not have the individual (end user) do a background check. Regardless of if they are prohibited or not. You cannot buy and give a firearm for someone else, unless it is direct family. Now you can "pay for it" as long as the end user is the one who is filling out the background. (There is some debate about this now tho). |
|
Quoted: No, It is a straw purchase if the intent to not have the individual (end user) do a background check. Regardless of if they are prohibited or not. You cannot buy and give a firearm for someone else, unless it is direct family. Now you can "pay for it" as long as the end user is the one who is filling out the background. (There is some debate about this now tho). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As far as I know, it's only a straw purchase if the ultimate possessor is a prohibited person. BTW - I don't necessarily, from a fundamental 2A standpoint, agree with it. That is just my understanding of the rules. No, It is a straw purchase if the intent to not have the individual (end user) do a background check. Regardless of if they are prohibited or not. You cannot buy and give a firearm for someone else, unless it is direct family. Now you can "pay for it" as long as the end user is the one who is filling out the background. (There is some debate about this now tho). Even worse than that, if you buy the gun and do the 4473, but are really buying it on someone else’s behalf, even if you have the other person do a 4473 to transfer that is a straw buy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abramski_v._United_States If OP’s mom pays for a gun online but the daughter/sister does the 4473 and the daughter/sister is the one keeping the gun, all is well. But it might be a red flag for the ffl. |
|
|
|
<-- FFL, this is the way to do it.
Quoted: As an FFL, Whoever's name is on the order slip is who needs to pick it up. She can legally buy for her child as long as she has no knowledge of any disqualifiers that would not allow them to own one. Easiest would be to do do the ship to / billing separate. Ship to your sisters name. Billing info your moms so card works. (Or you can try using your sisters name (If last name same, in billing also, most cards will let it go through). View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: As far as I know, it's only a straw purchase if the ultimate possessor is a prohibited person. BTW - I don't necessarily, from a fundamental 2A standpoint, agree with it. That is just my understanding of the rules. View Quote That is not true it is a common misconception. You can absolutely have a straw purchase between two legal purchasers. However gifts are legal. I don't believe what is described would be a straw purchase though I suppose it could be argued it is because your sister did not pay for it and she is doing the paperwork. It would probably be better if your mom did the paperwork and just gave it to her provided they are in the same state. Or gave her money to buy the gun with herself. |
|
Academy, sports and outdoors will only transfer the firearm to the person whose name is on the invoice and then charge you $60 for the transfer fee. I work at Academy.
|
|
Gift cards are a pretty easy solution. If mom and sistere are in the same state she can just buy it and give it to her.
|
|
Quoted: No, It is a straw purchase if the intent to not have the individual (end user) do a background check. Regardless of if they are prohibited or not. You cannot buy and give a firearm for someone else, unless it is direct family. Now you can "pay for it" as long as the end user is the one who is filling out the background. (There is some debate about this now tho). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As far as I know, it's only a straw purchase if the ultimate possessor is a prohibited person. BTW - I don't necessarily, from a fundamental 2A standpoint, agree with it. That is just my understanding of the rules. No, It is a straw purchase if the intent to not have the individual (end user) do a background check. Regardless of if they are prohibited or not. You cannot buy and give a firearm for someone else, unless it is direct family. Now you can "pay for it" as long as the end user is the one who is filling out the background. (There is some debate about this now tho). Not true a gift is explicitly described as legal in the 4473 instructions there is no requirement that it is family. |
|
I will also say, since the new 4473 has come out in the first seven days of this month we have had 19 people answer question 21B incorrectly and we have to deny the sale. The new wording on the 4473 is quite difficult for the average person to understand apparently.
|
|
Quoted: That is not true it is a common misconception. You can absolutely have a straw purchase between two legal purchasers. However gifts are legal. I don't believe what is described would be a straw purchase though I suppose it could be argued it is because your sister did not pay for it and she is doing the paperwork. It would probably be better if your mom did the paperwork and just gave it to her provided they are in the same state. Or gave her money to buy the gun with herself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As far as I know, it's only a straw purchase if the ultimate possessor is a prohibited person. BTW - I don't necessarily, from a fundamental 2A standpoint, agree with it. That is just my understanding of the rules. That is not true it is a common misconception. You can absolutely have a straw purchase between two legal purchasers. However gifts are legal. I don't believe what is described would be a straw purchase though I suppose it could be argued it is because your sister did not pay for it and she is doing the paperwork. It would probably be better if your mom did the paperwork and just gave it to her provided they are in the same state. Or gave her money to buy the gun with herself. Issue is name on the invoice for the FFL who receives it. Plain and simple. |
|
|
Quoted: I will also say, since the new 4473 has come out in the first seven days of this month we have had 19 people answer question 21B incorrectly and we have to deny the sale. The new wording on the 4473 is quite difficult for the average person to understand apparently. View Quote The amount of stupid fucks who can't understand basic fucking English, has me wanting to throat punch every customer who's confused. I had no patience with one guy, and when he asked me for help on that question, I asked him which word he needed a definition of to understand the question. ETA: Enough people on here know me IRL, and where I work, that they know, if I go that level on a dipshit, they earned it. |
|
Not everyone should have a gun. I’d propose a German Shepherd.
|
|
Quoted: A lot of FFLs won't do that. Name of purchaser not matching who is coming to pick it up tends to be a red flag for them. View Quote |
|
Your mom can buy the gun as a gift and give it to her if she isn't a prohibited person.
|
|
Quoted: I will also say, since the new 4473 has come out in the first seven days of this month we have had 19 people answer question 21B incorrectly and we have to deny the sale. The new wording on the 4473 is quite difficult for the average person to understand apparently. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: What is 21B? I don't have a 4473 in front of me View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I will also say, since the new 4473 has come out in the first seven days of this month we have had 19 people answer question 21B incorrectly and we have to deny the sale. The new wording on the 4473 is quite difficult for the average person to understand apparently. 21b: “Do you intend to purchase or acquire any firearm listed on this form and any continuation sheet(s) or ammunition, for sale of other disposition to any person described in questions 21(c)-(m) or to a person described in question 21.n.1 who does not fall within a nonimmigrant exception?” |
|
21 c doesn't confuse anyone.
21.c.: “Do you intend to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm listed on this form and any continuation sheet(s) or ammunition in furtherance of any felony or other offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of more than one year, a Federal crime of terrorism, or a drug trafficking offense?” |
|
|
Quoted: Your mom does the paperwork. Then gifts it to your sister. Perfectly legal. It's right in the instructions of the 4473 which nobody reads. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/467079/Screenshot_20230408_001516_Samsung_Notes-2774688.jpg As you can see, bona fide gifts do not constitute a straw purchase. View Quote Can only directly gift to someone in the same state and OP has not said it that's the case with his mom and sister. |
|
Quoted: A lot of FFLs won't do that. Name of purchaser not matching who is coming to pick it up tends to be a red flag for them. View Quote This plus if the firearm is ordered online via credit card, then there is an electronic trail that the person who paid for the firearm is not the person taking possession of the firearm. |
|
|
|
Somebody should be taking her to pick out her own gun, anyway.
|
|
I would call the FFL doing the transfer to check with them. It may be legal but it's best to not throw surprise's when you are doing the paperwork.
If y'all live in the same town why not just go give her a gun? |
|
A gift is a gift. Your mom can buy it and give it to her. If they are both at the shop, then your sister should do the paper work.
Why do y'all ask legality questions where its stored in perpetuity? |
|
never a straw purchaser if the end user gets the background check.
|
|
I wanted to do that for my daughter but my FFL said no dice. The names must match. I had to put it in my name then transfer it to my daughter.
|
|
Quoted: Can only directly gift to someone in the same state and OP has not said it that's the case with his mom and sister. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Your mom does the paperwork. Then gifts it to your sister. Perfectly legal. It's right in the instructions of the 4473 which nobody reads. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/467079/Screenshot_20230408_001516_Samsung_Notes-2774688.jpg As you can see, bona fide gifts do not constitute a straw purchase. Can only directly gift to someone in the same state and OP has not said it that's the case with his mom and sister. Thats why you don't ask these fucking questions on a monitored website. Op joined in 2006, surely he can sell or gift one of his collection, take the guesswork out. |
|
Quoted: 21 c doesn't confuse anyone. 21.c.: “Do you intend to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm listed on this form and any continuation sheet(s) or ammunition in furtherance of any felony or other offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of more than one year, a Federal crime of terrorism, or a drug trafficking offense?” View Quote What a stupid fucking question and if you answer yes, you're a stupid person. |
|
|
Quoted: So a little back story here, my sister is cleaning herself up (making better choices we’ll say). She doesn’t have a criminal record or anything like that. She recently got an apartment in a not so good part of town. My mom was wanting to buy her a handgun as a home warning gift. Could she legally buy from an online retailer, ship to an FFL and my sister do the paperwork, pay the fee, and take possession? View Quote Is your sister an addict and prohibited from owning a firearm on that basis? |
|
|
Quoted: That is not true it is a common misconception. You can absolutely have a straw purchase between two legal purchasers. However gifts are legal. I don't believe what is described would be a straw purchase though I suppose it could be argued it is because your sister did not pay for it and she is doing the paperwork. It would probably be better if your mom did the paperwork and just gave it to her provided they are in the same state. Or gave her money to buy the gun with herself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As far as I know, it's only a straw purchase if the ultimate possessor is a prohibited person. BTW - I don't necessarily, from a fundamental 2A standpoint, agree with it. That is just my understanding of the rules. That is not true it is a common misconception. You can absolutely have a straw purchase between two legal purchasers. However gifts are legal. I don't believe what is described would be a straw purchase though I suppose it could be argued it is because your sister did not pay for it and she is doing the paperwork. It would probably be better if your mom did the paperwork and just gave it to her provided they are in the same state. Or gave her money to buy the gun with herself. My father has purchased a couple guns for me in the shop. If I'm with him, I do a check so it doesn't look like a straw purchase. He paid. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.