[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Illinois Assault weapons and mag ban (Page 24 of 30)
|
Quoted:
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Injunction granted! Link?
There are so many cases going on it's hard to keep track. Does this apply state wide or is it another one that only applies to named defendants? |
|
Good judge |
|
Quoted: This is the case in Federal court in the Southern District of Illinois. Full text of ruling on the injunction https://drive.google.com/file/d/11j33qn--8I7JrsCs2mI0SZTjsWZ8Pc5V/view Defendants are ENJOINED from enforcing Illinois statutes 720 ILCS 5/24-1.9(b) and (c), and 720 ILCS 5/24-1.10, along with the PICA amended provisions set forth in 735 ILCS 5/24-1(a), including subparagraphs (11), (14), (15), and (16), statewide during the pendency of this litigation until the Court can address the merits. |
|
Wait…what? Now I am confused. I tried googling it and got this Fox News article from today: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-declines-block-illinois-gun-law-calls-assault-rifles-particularly-dangerous.amp That is judge Lindsay Jenkins . |
|
Quoted: Wait…what? Now I am confused. I tried googling it and got this Fox News article from today: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-declines-block-illinois-gun-law-calls-assault-rifles-particularly-dangerous.amp That is judge Lindsay Jenkins . There are multiple cases. Stop following the news. Get on Twitter and follower the lawyers and scholars actually putting in the work on these cases. |
|
Quoted: GOA's case was one thay got the injunction Well…. It looks like I am joining the GOA then. Besides, maybe they will actually do something about the automated license plate readers getting positioned just outside of gun ranges here in the “down state” area. |
|
Quoted: GOA's case was one thay got the injunction Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Case No. 3:23-cv-00215-SPM is Gun Owners of America's case. Who funded the one that got the injunction? 3:23-cv-00209 got the injunction. Which case is 00215 that you referred to as GOAs case earlier? |
|
Quoted: Wait…what? Now I am confused. I tried googling it and got this Fox News article from today: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-declines-block-illinois-gun-law-calls-assault-rifles-particularly-dangerous.amp That is judge Lindsay Jenkins . That was in the Northern District of IL with a liberal judge and they were making a much weaker case. All the media were running with it claiming that denying the injunction proved that the law was constitutional. Liberal logic. |
|
Quoted: There are multiple cases. Stop following the news. Get on Twitter and follower the lawyers and scholars actually putting in the work on these cases. I just woke up. I worked a night shift last night. That google drop box link wouldn’t cut and paste correctly on my iphone. I normally don’t do twitter. But for something this big, I might make an exception. |
|
Quoted: I just woke up. I worked a night shift last night. That google drop box link wouldn’t cut and paste correctly on my iphone. I normally don’t do twitter. But for something this big, I might make an exception. Quoted: Quoted: There are multiple cases. Stop following the news. Get on Twitter and follower the lawyers and scholars actually putting in the work on these cases. I just woke up. I worked a night shift last night. That google drop box link wouldn’t cut and paste correctly on my iphone. I normally don’t do twitter. But for something this big, I might make an exception. It is, perhaps unfortunately, the best source for gun rights legal battles |
|
Quoted: I just woke up. I worked a night shift last night. That google drop box link wouldn’t cut and paste correctly on my iphone. I normally don’t do twitter. But for something this big, I might make an exception. Quoted: Quoted: There are multiple cases. Stop following the news. Get on Twitter and follower the lawyers and scholars actually putting in the work on these cases. I just woke up. I worked a night shift last night. That google drop box link wouldn’t cut and paste correctly on my iphone. I normally don’t do twitter. But for something this big, I might make an exception. There are so many cases happening it feels like a part time job trying to keep track of them. |
|
Quoted: That was in the Northern District of IL with a liberal judge and they were making a much weaker case. All the media were running with it claiming that denying the injunction proved that the law was constitutional. Liberal logic. I think forum member “swanhunter” came down here to the Federal courthouse in East St. Louis like 2 or 3 weeks ago for that case. I want to say the judge’s name was something like McGlynn. Swanhunter had a thread posted in the Illinois hometown forum. |
|
Quoted: 3:23-cv-00209 got the injunction. Which case is 00215 that you referred to as GOAs case earlier? Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Case No. 3:23-cv-00215-SPM is Gun Owners of America's case. Who funded the one that got the injunction? 3:23-cv-00209 got the injunction. Which case is 00215 that you referred to as GOAs case earlier? 3:23-cv-00209 was the lead case, other cases were bundled. The ruling applies to all the cases listed. Attached File |
|
Quoted: Well…. It looks like I am joining the GOA then. Besides, maybe they will actually do something about the automated license plate readers getting positioned just outside of gun ranges here in the “down state” area. Quoted: Quoted: GOA's case was one thay got the injunction Well…. It looks like I am joining the GOA then. Besides, maybe they will actually do something about the automated license plate readers getting positioned just outside of gun ranges here in the “down state” area. I think, and someone can correct me if I am wrong, this is actually a consolidated case of four different suits with lawyers and plaintiffs from ... basically everyone... that got consolidated into the GOA case, including state gun shops, the ISRA and the NRA and even some municipalities. Not to diminish the GOA here, just clarifying that it was a big team effort. |
|
Quoted: I think, and someone can correct me if I am wrong, this is actually a consolidated case of four different suits with lawyers and plaintiffs from ... basically everyone... that got consolidated into the GOA case, ioncluding state gun shops, the ISRA and the NRA and even some municipalities. Not to diminish the GOA here, just clarifying that it was a big team effort. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: GOA's case was one thay got the injunction Well . It looks like I am joining the GOA then. Besides, maybe they will actually do something about the automated license plate readers getting positioned just outside of gun ranges here in the "down state" area. I think, and someone can correct me if I am wrong, this is actually a consolidated case of four different suits with lawyers and plaintiffs from ... basically everyone... that got consolidated into the GOA case, ioncluding state gun shops, the ISRA and the NRA and even some municipalities. Not to diminish the GOA here, just clarifying that it was a big team effort. |
|
Quoted: 3:23-cv-00209 was the lead case, other cases were bundled. The ruling applies to all the cases listed. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/122381/Screenshot_20230428_153123_Teams_jpg-2798807.JPG Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Case No. 3:23-cv-00215-SPM is Gun Owners of America's case. Who funded the one that got the injunction? 3:23-cv-00209 got the injunction. Which case is 00215 that you referred to as GOAs case earlier? 3:23-cv-00209 was the lead case, other cases were bundled. The ruling applies to all the cases listed. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/122381/Screenshot_20230428_153123_Teams_jpg-2798807.JPG yup, was watching John Crump livestream and he said that IL had all the cases combined so that they could try to get a "favorable judge" and only have to win "once" to quash all of them instead of having to bat 1.000 to win all cases. but their attempt was bad luck because they caught a Trump judge when they tried judge shopping. |
|
Quoted: yup, was watching John Crump livestream and he said that IL had all the cases combined so that they could try to get a "favorable judge" and only have to win "once" to quash all of them instead of having to bat 1.000 to win all cases. but their attempt was bad luck because they caught a Trump judge when they tried judge shopping. Haha |
|
Quoted: I think, and someone can correct me if I am wrong, this is actually a consolidated case of four different suits with lawyers and plaintiffs from ... basically everyone... that got consolidated into the GOA case, including state gun shops, the ISRA and the NRA and even some municipalities. Not to diminish the GOA here, just clarifying that it was a big team effort. GOA, SAF, FPC all claiming credit on Twitter so far |
NRA claiming credit? |
|
Quoted: Are they bulletproof? Welll….they are a camera, soooo… This is the “contraption” I spotted a few weeks ago: Attached File See the house numbers there….6224 This is how close they are to the gun club’s driveway: Attached File That one pinged my NCIC on August 29th, 2022. Another camera outside of the World Shooting Complex pinged my NCIC file on March 4, 2022. I haven’t been back yet to look for that camera. I have my own thread going on here in GD. Soooo….I now return ya’ll to your regularly scheduled IL AWB thread. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Injunction granted! Link?
 |
|
Quoted:
NRA claiming credit? |
|
Quoted: Welll….they are a camera, soooo… This is the “contraption” I spotted a few weeks ago: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/369122/2FC4FDA7-0927-4EB6-9E77-D7F13E6BE586_jpe-2798830.JPG See the house numbers there….6224 This is how close they are to the gun club’s driveway: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/369122/E9845C59-77A1-47EB-B7AE-89959960B1AB_jpe-2798838.JPG That one pinged my NCIC on August 29th, 2022. Another camera outside of the World Shooting Complex pinged my NCIC file on March 4, 2022. I haven’t been back yet to look for that camera. I have my own thread going on here in GD. Soooo….I now return ya’ll to your regularly scheduled IL AWB thread. That can’t be, its against the law to keep a database. |
|
Quoted: GOA, SAF, FPC all claiming credit on Twitter so far Quoted: GOA, SAF, FPC all claiming credit on Twitter so far Everyone was consolidated. Order applies to all the cases in the caption. From the docket ORDER granting 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Although the Order specifically identifies the plaintiffs in the lead case of Barnett, et al. v. Raoul, et al., 23-cv-209-SPM, the caption also references the consolidated cases, i.e., Harrel, et al. v. Raoul, et al., 23-cv-141-SPM; Langley, et al. v. Kelly, et al., 23-cv-192-SPM; and, Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, et al. v. Pritzker, et al., 23-cv-215-SPM. Because the same analysis applies in these consolidated cases, the corresponding Motions for Preliminary Injunction are also be GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 4/28/2023. (jce) (Entered: 04/28/2023) |
|
Quoted: That can’t be, its against the law to keep a database. As a side note, the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) bought up a whole bunch of Illinoisians’s cell phone location data , 2 years worth, in January 2019 (a year before covid). https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/illinois-bought-invasive-phone-location-data-banned-broker-safegraph I am sure ….100% positive that Illinois state would never use that data to track people to gun stores or gun ranges. Pfftt…. Nope. The .gov would not do anything nefarious with all that data. |
|
https://www.gunssavelife.com/huge-win-injunction-issued-freedom-week-starts-now/ This page has the full injunction viewable in your browser. |
|
|
Quoted:
Unless you live in Crook County  Won't ship to me, but will ship to my FFL Down the street. Ah well.. shut up and take my money |
 HUGE 2A NEWS: Federal Court Declares Assault Weapon and Magazine bans to be UNCONSTITUTIONAL... |
|
That is awesome news for Illinois That's a huge blow to Illinois anti-gunners. Screw anti-gunners Let Freedom Ring! Here he breaks it down piece by piece. The judge also mentions pistol braces.. So cool!  BREAKING NEWS: Illinois Assault Weapon & Magazine Bans HALTED!! And Judge Mentions Pistol Braces!!! |
 Federal Judge issues Injunction Again Illinois Gun Ban |
|
Federal judge grants injunction temporarily blocking enforcement of Illinois gun law | Fox News Gun Owners of America, a plaintiff in the case, said in a statement that the ruling should send a message to Pritzker. "Governor Pritzker and his anti-gun cabal in the legislature thought they could steam roll the Second Amendment, and this ruling makes clear that they abused their authority and infringed on their citizens’ rights. We look forward to continuing this fight," GOA Senior Vice President Erich Pratt said. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-grants-injunction-temporarily-blocking-enforcement-illinois-gun-law |