|
Quoted: Not buying it these tracks were made and not by bigfeet as the fauna and moss would not simply disappear. https://i.dailymail.com/1s/2026/05/04/04/108350975-15787701-image-a-98_1777866773776.jpg Those big feet are obviously radioactive. |
|
Quoted: It's all BS. It is an entertainment "industry" but is not real. Example - When someone steps on the ground, their foot does not sculpt out the surface vegetation, no matter how BIG their foot is. This "print" was dug out by someone. https://i.dailymail.com/1s/2026/05/04/04/108350975-15787701-image-a-98_1777866773776.jpg I think the reason is because the guy made a cast of it and it pulled out the vegetation. you can see all the vegetation stuck in the cast |
|
Quoted: I believe that there is a correlation between the states that legalized weed and the states where bigfeet sightings have increased. I have hunted in every part of Ohio and just can’t see how such a creature could stay hidden and continue to live there. Attached File |
|
Quoted: I watched some AI analysis of Bigfoot sightings and patterns just out of curiosity, It said the one pattern that emerged was sightings most consistently appeared in areas in advance of economic strife or breakdown. If your town has a bunch of Bigfoot sightings, might be likely the town industry is about to pack up. Sounds like the analysis in another thread of the average age people with tattoos die vs non-tattooed. |
|
Quoted: we have members that have seen a Bigfoot up close and some that don't want to post about it in these threads because they would be called liars Quoted: Quoted: A large percentage of the population in NEO have never experienced normal bear encounters/sightings like in other parts of the country where it's much more common. So, it's always a samsquanch.  Heck, I almost never see bears at my place in WV and it's in the middle of the Monongahela National Forest. I've got eight security cameras around my property and they have never once in 11 years recorded a bear. But I don't have bird or deer feeders that attract them. I've seen exactly one in the wild while trout fishing back on the river in Smoke Hole. Now, the Allegheny national Forest in PA is crawling with bears. I saw more in one backpacking trip there than I've seen in 30 years in WV. we have members that have seen a Bigfoot up close and some that don't want to post about it in these threads because they would be called liars I won't call them liars.....but as far as I can get on board is, that they believe they saw a bigfoot. It doesn't help that there are professional liars attached to every supernatural/crazy thing, bigfoot, aliens, ghosts...etc. If there has been a show about it on the History channel in the last 15 years....I'm super skeptical. What's that saying, extortionary claims require extraordinary evidence? Just saying, I saw it...trust me, doesn't sway me. |
|
Quoted: There was a long bigfoot thread about a month ago. Apparently there are a lot of believers here. Ive never seen one and dont consider myself a “ believer “ but the global phenomena throughout history is very odd . I wouldn’t put myself in the non believer category either. |
|
Wow big foot might be kinda hot. But I hear she smells bad. |
|
Quoted: Thought Mothman would prefer pepperoni rolls & Mt. Dew. Quoted: Quoted: WV at least got mothman. Mothman stole my meth in Morgantown. Thought Mothman would prefer pepperoni rolls & Mt. Dew.  Pepperoni rolls and Mt Dew don’t steal catalytic converters. Meth makes that a good idea. (I have this shirt, thanks to my SO, who’s from WV.) |
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/IMG_9835-3757398.jpg Pepperoni rolls and Mt Dew don’t steal catalytic converters. Meth makes that a good idea. (I have this shirt, thanks to my SO, who’s from WV.) 
|
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/IMG_9835-3757398.jpg Pepperoni rolls and Mt Dew don’t steal catalytic converters. Meth makes that a good idea. (I have this shirt, thanks to my SO, who’s from WV.) Sorry, Andover Gulf has superior Pepperoni rolls. Mothman likes DiCarlos pizza. |
|
Quoted: God help me I love these threads. It’s a little sad how the latest trend for the True Believers is to claim they’re angels or demons or whatever. It was more fun when they at least tried to argue that there was physical evidence. tracks are physical evidence |
|
Quoted: Tracks are physical evidence of a hoaxer since they have been linked to hoaxers many times. None have ever been linked to a "bigfoot." Quoted: Quoted: tracks are physical evidence Exactly. |
|
Quoted: I watched some AI analysis of Bigfoot sightings and patterns just out of curiosity, It said the one pattern that emerged was sightings most consistently appeared in areas in advance of economic strife or breakdown. If your town has a bunch of Bigfoot sightings, might be likely the town industry is about to pack up. Well generally they are going to be more rual because that’s where the woods are located, so yeah economics are going to be different. This is a correlation does not equal causation moment. |
|
Quoted: Not buying it these tracks were made and not by bigfeet as the fauna and moss would not simply disappear. https://i.dailymail.com/1s/2026/05/04/04/108350975-15787701-image-a-98_1777866773776.jpg If the track was cast, it removed all that shit. |
|
Quoted: I don't have the expertise or the degree for that |
|
Quoted: tracks are physical evidence Quoted: Quoted: God help me I love these threads. It’s a little sad how the latest trend for the True Believers is to claim they’re angels or demons or whatever. It was more fun when they at least tried to argue that there was physical evidence. tracks are physical evidence Which tracks have been proved to be real? See the members here who claim that it’s impossible to prove Bigfoot exists due to it being an inter dimensional being that doesn’t need a breeding population, doesn’t leave scat, can evade all methods of detection including thermal, and die in a separate dimension as to not leave bodies laying around are doing more harm than good to the “Bigfoot is real” cause. The absolute leaps and moving of goal posts that occur when folks ask for proof is mind blowing. Everything from you can’t prove it, to the world isn’t ready so I won’t offer evidence to back up my claims |
|
Quoted: Yep, some display "dermal ridges" that can't readily be dismissed as hoaxes. agree and some of those were cast way before this was even discussed in Bigfoot research . No one was talking about dermal ridges until the 80's but some tracks cast in the early 70's show them . no hoaxers were out making intricate tracks out in the woods like that in the late 60's early 70's |
|
Quoted: There is no shortage of physical anthropologists who will help you for free if you present them with the convincing evidence you say you have. They will write it for you and put your name on the paper as a 2nd author. I never claimed to have any evidence . I have never seen or heard one in my time in the woods and I have been in some real wilderness . Most people will never see one |
|
Quoted: yes but I never found them , they were studied by Krantz and Meldrum and they have the casts in their collections Krantz was just trolling anyway. |
|
Quoted: They can't? |
|
Quoted: Those guys are both dead, so they don't have those things. Both failed to demonstrate that any of them could be linked to anything but a hoaxer. Neither could provide physical evidence for any kind of creature like a bigfoot. Krantz was just trolling anyway. i will agree that until a body or skeletal remains are found or killed the entire scientific community will never accept it as fact . No video evidence or trail cam pics will ever do . |