AR Sponsor
ULTRA light weight picture thread....the under 6 crowd. (Page 5 of 39)
|
Originally Posted By Lohe:
Well got most my parts in. And just a hair over 5lbs but thats with a M16 BCG will be swaping for a LMOS. And that's a 16" barrel I have a 14.5 coming. But didn't have a flash hider or sights yet. So with the parts swap I should be right around the 5lb mark would be nice if I go under. <a href="http://s255.photobucket.com/user/lohe123/media/17A2EBC0-E762-405E-99C4-E6E8DF8D15EC_zpskofzu0fe.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh148/lohe123/17A2EBC0-E762-405E-99C4-E6E8DF8D15EC_zpskofzu0fe.jpg</a> Specs? |
...believe in me, I'm with the High Command.
Joined:
May 2006
Posts:
5557
EE: 100% (35)
|
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
As soon as they release their non-FA model, I'll be getting a couple. Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
Mag tactical upper on it's way. As soon as they release their non-FA model, I'll be getting a couple. +1 |
"When trading bullets it is better to give than to receive"
"Take your money and a traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your clothes and buy one!" Jesus Christ - Luke 22.36
NRA Endowment Member
"Take your money and a traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your clothes and buy one!" Jesus Christ - Luke 22.36
NRA Endowment Member
|
Originally Posted By PursuitSS:
+1 Originally Posted By PursuitSS:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
Mag tactical upper on it's way. As soon as they release their non-FA model, I'll be getting a couple. +1 I got an e-mail from them a few days ago saying they are definitely going to make them, no ETA though. |
You keep comparing yourself to someone that people actually liked, and I think that's where you first stepped off. -TREETOP
...believe in me, I'm with the High Command.
Joined:
May 2006
Posts:
5558
EE: 100% (35)
|
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
I got an e-mail from them a few days ago saying they are definitely going to make them, no ETA though. Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By PursuitSS:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
Mag tactical upper on it's way. As soon as they release their non-FA model, I'll be getting a couple. +1 I got an e-mail from them a few days ago saying they are definitely going to make them, no ETA though. |
"When trading bullets it is better to give than to receive"
"Take your money and a traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your clothes and buy one!" Jesus Christ - Luke 22.36
NRA Endowment Member
"Take your money and a traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your clothes and buy one!" Jesus Christ - Luke 22.36
NRA Endowment Member
|
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
If someone were to build a 10" Barreled Ar with a pistol positioned gas block and a 3.8oz boomfab carrier - where can run learn about the tricks to properly setup and run such a system? What buffers to be used? A pigtail gas tube? etc. Pistol length gas on a 10" 5.56 barrel is a bad idea. High port pressure coupled with excessive dwell time is just asking for parts to break early. ETA: you'd also have a hard time finding that barrel, I've never seen it as an option on a factory barrel. Also, pigtail gas tubes are a gimmick. Lengthening the gas tube without moving the gas port further down the barrel solves nothing. |
You keep comparing yourself to someone that people actually liked, and I think that's where you first stepped off. -TREETOP
|
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Pistol length gas on a 10" 5.56 barrel is a bad idea. High port pressure coupled with excessive dwell time is just asking for parts to break early. ETA: you'd also have a hard time finding that barrel, I've never seen it as an option on a factory barrel. Also, pigtail gas tubes are a gimmick. Lengthening the gas tube without moving the gas port further down the barrel solves nothing. Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
If someone were to build a 10" Barreled Ar with a pistol positioned gas block and a 3.8oz boomfab carrier - where can run learn about the tricks to properly setup and run such a system? What buffers to be used? A pigtail gas tube? etc. Pistol length gas on a 10" 5.56 barrel is a bad idea. High port pressure coupled with excessive dwell time is just asking for parts to break early. ETA: you'd also have a hard time finding that barrel, I've never seen it as an option on a factory barrel. Also, pigtail gas tubes are a gimmick. Lengthening the gas tube without moving the gas port further down the barrel solves nothing. What length gas system on a 10" 223 barrel would you suggest? EDIT: It is either that or a carbine length. Nothing else would fit. Note I would be running an adjustable gas block as well. |
|
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
What length gas system on a 10" 223 barrel would you suggest? EDIT: It is either that or a carbine length. Nothing else would fit. Note I would be running an adjustable gas block as well. Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
If someone were to build a 10" Barreled Ar with a pistol positioned gas block and a 3.8oz boomfab carrier - where can run learn about the tricks to properly setup and run such a system? What buffers to be used? A pigtail gas tube? etc. Pistol length gas on a 10" 5.56 barrel is a bad idea. High port pressure coupled with excessive dwell time is just asking for parts to break early. ETA: you'd also have a hard time finding that barrel, I've never seen it as an option on a factory barrel. Also, pigtail gas tubes are a gimmick. Lengthening the gas tube without moving the gas port further down the barrel solves nothing. What length gas system on a 10" 223 barrel would you suggest? EDIT: It is either that or a carbine length. Nothing else would fit. Note I would be running an adjustable gas block as well. Carbine. |
-Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. ~ One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
|
Originally Posted By djkest: I think it would be really awesome if we had some sort of repository for weights for various items. I'm not 100% sure what it would look like or where on ARFCOM it would be posted. AR Parts Weights : Sheet1
|
|
Originally Posted By usmcmp:
A little out of date but a start AR Parts Weights: Sheet1
Originally Posted By usmcmp:
Originally Posted By djkest:
I think it would be really awesome if we had some sort of repository for weights for various items. I'm not 100% sure what it would look like or where on ARFCOM it would be posted. AR Parts Weights: Sheet1
|
|
Speaking of Mag Tactical...
http://www.magtacticalsystems.com/index.php/rifles/product/231-air-15-recon#specs A bit pricey but lightweight out of the box. Cool, but not as fun as doing it yourself. |
|
Originally Posted By Lohe:
Well got most my parts in. And just a hair over 5lbs but thats with a M16 BCG will be swaping for a LMOS. And that's a 16" barrel I have a 14.5 coming. But didn't have a flash hider or sights yet. So with the parts swap I should be right around the 5lb mark would be nice if I go under. <a href="http://s255.photobucket.com/user/lohe123/media/17A2EBC0-E762-405E-99C4-E6E8DF8D15EC_zpskofzu0fe.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh148/lohe123/17A2EBC0-E762-405E-99C4-E6E8DF8D15EC_zpskofzu0fe.jpg</a> Well found the BCG I am going to use. Lighter than the JP lmos. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_12/636363_.html&page=3&anc=6343671#i6343671 |
|
Changed MK4 13 for 9.5 LWRC compact for Ultra Compact. Normal lower instead of MEGA ambi. Now well under 6. |
Scrips, Arfcommers, countrymen, I come not praise the Cola Warrior but to penalize him. The evil that the conex does lives after it, the pain oft interred in your bones.
|
Originally Posted By RustedAce:
LWRC compact for Ultra Compact. Now well under 6. http://i60.tinypic.com/11m6zw1.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/35ioagy.jpg Couple questions. Could you weight your LWRC compact? They state 7.9 ounces. Also, did you weigh the Ultra-compact stock and hardware seperately? They don't list the weight for the ultra-compact. Thanks. |
The zombies are coming...
|
My scale says: Compact: 8oz. Ultra comp: 7.2 UC buffer/ spring: 3.8 (I replaced one of the heavier weights in it with a standard.) standard buffer/ spring: 4.8 Should have weighed the whole kit before I installed it, but its stacked now.
![]() |
Scrips, Arfcommers, countrymen, I come not praise the Cola Warrior but to penalize him. The evil that the conex does lives after it, the pain oft interred in your bones.
|
Originally Posted By Nada-Nada:
Wow. I think I am going to go with the CAR stock at 4.4oz for now. If it bothers me, I will get a different stock, but one under 6 oz. I do like that super compact setup, but not at that weight. Ultra compact buffer tube and internals with a chopped CAR stock. |
You keep comparing yourself to someone that people actually liked, and I think that's where you first stepped off. -TREETOP
|
Originally Posted By JoshAston: Ultra compact buffer tube and internals with a chopped CAR stock. You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks.
|
Scrips, Arfcommers, countrymen, I come not praise the Cola Warrior but to penalize him. The evil that the conex does lives after it, the pain oft interred in your bones.
|
Originally Posted By RustedAce:
You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. Originally Posted By RustedAce:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Ultra compact buffer tube and internals with a chopped CAR stock. You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. Or just leave the buffer empty. |
You keep comparing yourself to someone that people actually liked, and I think that's where you first stepped off. -TREETOP
|
Originally Posted By RustedAce:
You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. Originally Posted By RustedAce:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Ultra compact buffer tube and internals with a chopped CAR stock. You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. Very nice, thanks for the updates. That's what I'm going for too. Lightweight but still comfortable. If you feel like shaving half ounces off your build, V7 systems has some really cool trick parts available, such as a slick Aluminum Ejection Port Door. I'm saving up for an LWRC Compact stock in FDE. Wishing they would do free shipping or a sale or something. The Battlelink Minimalist is tempting but for some reason I don't think it would be that comfortable, esp with drills. |
The zombies are coming...
|
Anyone have any experience with TACCOM ultra light buffer systems?
http://www.taccom3g.com/UL_AR15_RECOIL_SYSTEM.html |
|
Has anyone used the spikes bcg that has holes drilled to lighten them? I found a video showing only 3\4 oz savings, but what about felt recoil any experience?
https://www.primaryarms.com/Bolt-Carrier-Group-Spike-s-Lightweight-Nickel-Bo-p/st5bg05.htm |
|
Originally Posted By RustedAce: You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Originally Posted By RustedAce: Originally Posted By JoshAston: Ultra compact buffer tube and internals with a chopped CAR stock. You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. |
|
Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. B5 Bravo stock is about 8 oz and very comfortable imo. Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Originally Posted By RustedAce:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Ultra compact buffer tube and internals with a chopped CAR stock. You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. B5 Bravo stock is about 8 oz and very comfortable imo. Yes the B5 Systems Sopmod Bravo is 8.25 oz LWRC Compact 7.9-8.0 ounces LCRC Ultra Compact : also about 8 oz |
The zombies are coming...
|
Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. B5 Bravo stock is about 8 oz and very comfortable imo. Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Originally Posted By RustedAce:
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Ultra compact buffer tube and internals with a chopped CAR stock. You could also replace both tungsten weights with steel and save a little more. Im digging my set up though, going for as light as I can and still be comfy/ functional. I can't stand the CAR stocks. B5 Bravo stock is about 8 oz and very comfortable imo. Yes the B5 Systems Sopmod Bravo is 8.25 oz LWRC Compact 7.9-8.0 ounces LCRC Ultra Compact : 7.2 oz |
The zombies are coming...
|
Originally Posted By Whhood: I've got 2 B5 Bravos and they both weigh 9.4 on two different scales. Both are painted if that matters? Lil off spec from what the websites tell you I guess. |
|
Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Mine says 8.96 and my MOE with buttpad is 9.11. Both are painted if that matters? Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Originally Posted By Whhood:
I've got 2 B5 Bravos and they both weigh 9.4 on two different scales. Both are painted if that matters? Does your Bravo have the buttpad? |
|
Originally Posted By Whhood: Does your Bravo have the buttpad? Originally Posted By Whhood: Originally Posted By jukeboxx13: Originally Posted By Whhood: I've got 2 B5 Bravos and they both weigh 9.4 on two different scales. Both are painted if that matters? Does your Bravo have the buttpad? |
|
Originally Posted By paralax:
Has anyone used the spikes bcg that has holes drilled to lighten them? I found a video showing only 3\4 oz savings, but what about felt recoil any experience? https://www.primaryarms.com/Bolt-Carrier-Group-Spike-s-Lightweight-Nickel-Bo-p/st5bg05.htm Look at the top of the page read the BCG link I posted...
|
|
Originally Posted By arjohnson:
<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/arjohnson/media/DSCF7146_zps855eae99.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/arjohnson/DSCF7146_zps855eae99.jpg</a> that is under 6? |
|
Originally Posted By cj3waker: that is under 6? Originally Posted By cj3waker: Originally Posted By arjohnson: <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/arjohnson/media/DSCF7146_zps855eae99.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v441/arjohnson/DSCF7146_zps855eae99.jpg</a> that is under 6? |
ULTRA light weight picture thread....the under 6 crowd. (Page 5 of 39)
AR Sponsor













