Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
2/3/2008 6:26:31 PM EDT
Well, here are the 2 rounds sectioned.
Tomorrow PPU '07 will be fired into a RiverSide turkey (thawed) of 11.2# including giblets. The turkey is roughly 6" thick. If it is true M193 spec ammo, I expect the witness panel to show a fragged mess on the other side of the turkey.



PS. TAKE THAT YOU WATER JUG THEORY DE-BUNKERS!

PSS. A turkey isn't people, but neither is gelatin. Until I get a volunteer, get over it
2/3/2008 6:39:28 PM EDT
[#1]
Nice!

looking forward to the results
2/3/2008 9:15:52 PM EDT
[#2]
Susposedly Pig is the closest thing to human flesh. Maybe shooting a 20 pound ham would be more realistic as far as bullet performance VS Human flesh?
2/3/2008 10:04:27 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Susposedly Pig is the closest thing to human flesh. Maybe shooting a 20 pound ham would be more realistic as far as bullet performance VS Human flesh?


A turkey is what I have. If it wont frag on a turkey, I doubt it would on a person.
2/4/2008 10:31:33 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
Susposedly Pig is the closest thing to human flesh. Maybe shooting a 20 pound ham would be more realistic as far as bullet performance VS Human flesh?


Great idea, I look forward to seeing your test results...

I could just imagine my wife's face if I told her I brought home a 20lb ham that I was going to shoot holes in.....
2/4/2008 11:21:28 AM EDT
[#5]
Can't wait to see the results. This will decide if I buy a 1000rds of PP or wait for midway to get some xm193 back in.
2/4/2008 11:27:35 AM EDT
[#6]
If you wait, by them time Midway gets the XM back in stock...   the prices of both will have gone up 50%
2/4/2008 12:55:38 PM EDT
[#7]
M193 Specs doesnt mean it has to Frag

M193 specs DOESNT CALL FOR JUST A COPPER JACKET can be Mild steel jacket

Just to let you guys know
Chuck Santose is the one who told be about M193 specs
2/4/2008 1:47:30 PM EDT
[#8]
FYI Q3131 did the same thing as PPU at 100 yards (PPU results at 100y pictured) and at 25 yards both appeared to frag pretty badly. I see no reason for PPU to not frag as well as Q3131. Both of their jackets are = thickness, and both exibit the same behavior when striking the turkey. The Q3131 did impact near the PPU so the wound channels (slightly overlapping possibly) may have caused the Q3131 to encounter less resistance. I think that is just academic though. Anyways, frag or not it is clean, reliable, tumbles, and chronographs ar 3180fps ave. from a 20" non CL barreled AR. Here are the pics. I discovered also that the turkey was filled with giblets and thus the only REAL resistance the bullet encountered as the thin amounts of meat on the turkey's abdomen and dorsal regions (entry and exit). No major bones were hit.


Entrance

Exit

Witness Panel

PS. I also fired 10 rounds of Wolf Black Box 62gr at 100y and got 4 shots touching, 1 shot an inch or 2 away, same with another shot, and...well basically for a seated/kneeling position with open sights using a pole for support I was impressed and will buy more.
2/4/2008 1:49:27 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
Can't wait to see the results. This will decide if I buy a 1000rds of PP or wait for midway to get some xm193 back in.


I know of other sources who have plenty of brown-box XM as well as XMA in stock.
2/4/2008 2:35:59 PM EDT
[#10]
So did they fragment? It seems obvious from the picture of the box that whatever was fired did not fragment, but did yaw. Not sure which one it was, what the distance was, or if either one of them fragmented in the turket?

EDIT: where on the bullet were the bullets sectioned? Those jackets seem unusually thick, but it might just be me.

Thanks!
2/4/2008 2:41:52 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
So did they fragment? It seems obvious from the picture of the box that whatever was fired did not fragment, but did yaw. Not sure which one it was, what the distance was, or if either one of them fragmented in the turket?
That was PPU M193. As I stated, the Q3131 did the same thing (yaw but no frag). At 25 yards both bullets fragged according to the witness panel.

EDIT: where on the bullet were the bullets sectioned? Those jackets seem unusually thick, but it might just be me.

They were sectioned about 1-2mm above the cannelure (towards the point). I will post a sectioned Wolf 55gr round here in another hour or 2.

Thanks!
2/4/2008 3:01:11 PM EDT
[#12]
Hrmm...pulled a 55gr bullet from laquer coated wolf and sectioned it. You cannot tell the 3 apart. Pic to soon follow (bullet does NOT attract a magnet AT ALL either...)

So much for "wolf has a thick, steel containing jacket"...
2/4/2008 3:35:38 PM EDT
[#13]
12_gauge, you are to be commended for all this testing while the rest of us sit on our asses and reap the benefits of your research!

Seriously, thanks for posting the results .
2/4/2008 4:06:08 PM EDT
[#14]
I cannot tell which (if any) are "thicker" than the other.



Q=Q3131 P=Prvi M193 W=Wolf 55gr Laquer Case
None of them attracted a magnet in the slightest BTW
2/4/2008 5:05:57 PM EDT
[#15]
Good stuff, Thanks!
2/4/2008 6:04:30 PM EDT
[#16]
Nice pics.
2/4/2008 7:35:20 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
Hrmm...pulled a 55gr bullet from laquer coated wolf and sectioned it. You cannot tell the 3 apart. Pic to soon follow (bullet does NOT attract a magnet AT ALL either...)

So much for "wolf has a thick, steel containing jacket"...



I buy a lot of Wolf for plinking and it all has a poly coated case and a bi-metal jacket.
The Wolf you are using is probably not new production, but several years old.
I prefer the old lacquer Wolf because I found it more accurate than the current stuff, which is 4 MOA in my guns. The old Wolf was 2.5 MOA, same as standard military ammo like Guat, Fiocchi, XM193, etc.

If you've found a source of lacquer Wolf for around $210/K, please PM me and I'll buy some. I'm shooting Prvi now because it's the cheapest reasonably accurate ammo I can find.
2/4/2008 7:50:54 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Hrmm...pulled a 55gr bullet from laquer coated wolf and sectioned it. You cannot tell the 3 apart. Pic to soon follow (bullet does NOT attract a magnet AT ALL either...)

So much for "wolf has a thick, steel containing jacket"...



I buy a lot of Wolf for plinking and it all has a poly coated case and a bi-metal jacket.
The Wolf you are using is probably not new production, but several years old.
I prefer the old lacquer Wolf because I found it more accurate than the current stuff, which is 4 MOA in my guns. The old Wolf was 2.5 MOA, same as standard military ammo like Guat, Fiocchi, XM193, etc.

If you've found a source of lacquer Wolf for around $210/K, please PM me and I'll buy some. I'm shooting Prvi now because it's the cheapest reasonably accurate ammo I can find.


The wolf I sectioned had a HUGE bubble (empty space) between the jacket and the tip of hte lead core that was exposed as I ground it down. Since this is not about Wolf laquer ammo, I did not see fit to mention it, but I cannot see how this bubble would be conducive to accuracy/consistancy.
2/4/2008 9:03:51 PM EDT
[#19]
Could you get any sections of the rounds behind the cannelure? For what it is worth, I believe the thickness behind the cannelure would be most important, since most M193 type projectiles stay pretty much intact forward of the cannelure. It is the rear that does the tearing and ripping.

I am not sure that there would be much of a difference in jacket thickness depending on locations, but you never know?

Also, the Wolf projectiles are travelling 200 FPS or slower than any M193 spec. ammunition, so even assuming the same projectile, you could not assume similar performance. I would think that despite failing the magnetic test, they would use some other cheap, hard metal in the manufacturing process, although I wouldnt have the slightest clue what it would be. But who knows what they are using? It seems that Wolf changes their components pretty often, especially in .223 and 7.62x39.

Also, I know that Wolf has had several calibers loaded with bullets containing a hollow cavity in the nose, and that includes 7.62x39. This is done simply for terminal performance. The air gap pushes the center of gravity to the rear, cuasing the bullet to loose stability upon impact, cuasing a much quicker yaw. I have never actually known them to do this in .223, but I have heard they do it.
2/4/2008 9:45:24 PM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Hrmm...pulled a 55gr bullet from laquer coated wolf and sectioned it. You cannot tell the 3 apart. Pic to soon follow (bullet does NOT attract a magnet AT ALL either...)

So much for "wolf has a thick, steel containing jacket"...



I buy a lot of Wolf for plinking and it all has a poly coated case and a bi-metal jacket.
The Wolf you are using is probably not new production, but several years old.
I prefer the old lacquer Wolf because I found it more accurate than the current stuff, which is 4 MOA in my guns. The old Wolf was 2.5 MOA, same as standard military ammo like Guat, Fiocchi, XM193, etc.

If you've found a source of lacquer Wolf for around $210/K, please PM me and I'll buy some. I'm shooting Prvi now because it's the cheapest reasonably accurate ammo I can find.


All new Wolf 223 ammo has the bimetal (steel) bullet. Black box used to be copper but they changed to steel without notice. Cheaper I guess. Also, I think after 2008 price increase, Wolf steel ammo will be about $240 per 1000.
2/4/2008 10:03:13 PM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Hrmm...pulled a 55gr bullet from laquer coated wolf and sectioned it. You cannot tell the 3 apart. Pic to soon follow (bullet does NOT attract a magnet AT ALL either...)

So much for "wolf has a thick, steel containing jacket"...



I buy a lot of Wolf for plinking and it all has a poly coated case and a bi-metal jacket.
The Wolf you are using is probably not new production, but several years old.
I prefer the old lacquer Wolf because I found it more accurate than the current stuff, which is 4 MOA in my guns. The old Wolf was 2.5 MOA, same as standard military ammo like Guat, Fiocchi, XM193, etc.

If you've found a source of lacquer Wolf for around $210/K, please PM me and I'll buy some. I'm shooting Prvi now because it's the cheapest reasonably accurate ammo I can find.


All new Wolf 223 ammo has the bimetal (steel) bullet. Black box used to be copper but they changed to steel without notice. Cheaper I guess. Also, I think after 2008 price increase, Wolf steel ammo will be about $240 per 1000.


I know it is bad form, but I was eating while reading this. Thanks. Let me clean the hurl off my keyboard.
2/5/2008 8:09:52 AM EDT
[#22]
S&B SS109 is 3184FPS at 25M SD 14 with a 20incher

Thats close to your specs

was the FPS at the muzzle


Ive shot Foxes, coyote, pigs,deer etc with the 5.56mm it will do a number

The 220 is even better at makeing nasty holes

I wish I took pics back then
2/5/2008 8:14:29 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Hrmm...pulled a 55gr bullet from laquer coated wolf and sectioned it. You cannot tell the 3 apart. Pic to soon follow (bullet does NOT attract a magnet AT ALL either...)

So much for "wolf has a thick, steel containing jacket"...



I buy a lot of Wolf for plinking and it all has a poly coated case and a bi-metal jacket.
The Wolf you are using is probably not new production, but several years old.
I prefer the old lacquer Wolf because I found it more accurate than the current stuff, which is 4 MOA in my guns. The old Wolf was 2.5 MOA, same as standard military ammo like Guat, Fiocchi, XM193, etc.

If you've found a source of lacquer Wolf for around $210/K, please PM me and I'll buy some. I'm shooting Prvi now because it's the cheapest reasonably accurate ammo I can find.


The wolf I sectioned had a HUGE bubble (empty space) between the jacket and the tip of hte lead core that was exposed as I ground it down. Since this is not about Wolf laquer ammo, I did not see fit to mention it, but I cannot see how this bubble would be conducive to accuracy/consistancy.





the bubble as you say is normal
the 5.45 x 39mm is like that
2/5/2008 4:04:47 PM EDT
[#24]
Now we know what to do in the event of a nation-wide turkey rebellion.

2/5/2008 5:01:29 PM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:
I know it is bad form, but I was eating while reading this. Thanks. Let me clean the hurl off my keyboard.


A real Texan's response is...did you bake it or deep fry it?
2/6/2008 9:21:09 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I know it is bad form, but I was eating while reading this. Thanks. Let me clean the hurl off my keyboard.


A real Texan's response is...did you bake it or deep fry it?



LOL
6/28/2008 7:17:47 PM EDT
[#27]
bump

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

AR Sponsor