Posted: 7/26/2011 10:45:53 PM EDT
|
Nice post... I seem to remember someone else doing this a few years back. Thinking he narrowed choices to two ??
Last post both brands had been kept loaded every day. 365\24\7. At last post magazines were narrowed to Wilson ETM and Tripp Cobra. He noted no discernable difference in performance between the two brands. 4 magazines in use are 8 rounders. |
| It's interesting that you didn't like the CMC Power Mag. The Wilson ETM was designed to compete with the CMC as it had a better tube and spring than the Wilson 47D. Hilton Yam holds the Power Mag in very high regard. How did you measure the tension of the springs? |
|
My opinion on these mags and how they function is very roughly based on keeping the mags fully loaded for extended periods of time and then using them. I usually run about 200-300rds a time at the range. When a mag fails, I will try it in a different gun. When the mag starts to fail on the last round, its a problem for me. I'm not using an exact science here, the post is mainly to show the difference in the mag components and you can come to your own conclusions.
I have been using Wilson 47D exclusively for close to 10 years and I think they are good mags, not the best. Been through about 10-12 mag tubes, maybe more and my regular routine would be to keep replacing the the spring with the Wilson springs/follower kit when they started to get weak. I felt like I was having to replace the springs too often so I started using the Tripp Cobra and CerTac8, and just recently the Metalform Elite 8. I'm currently using 7 Metalform Elite Mags, so far sent one back to Brownells and got replaced because the mag tube was too tight. |
|
nice write-up OP
Quoted:
Nice post... I seem to remember someone else doing this a few years back.... Was this the one you were referring to? Quoted: Anyone with more interest in the subject of 1911 magazine feed lips and follower design would do well to read this article. http://how-i-did-it.org/magazines/ from here http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=94016 |
|
Quoted:
Wilson 47 for the win. They work like a champ in my SA Loaded, Colt gov and RIA 1911's. Wilson 47D's just work. I use them and McCormick 8 and 10 rounders exclusively. They run every kind and brand of ammo without fail in my Springer Loaded and Mil-Spec. I don't think 47D's have "weak tubes or springs" in the least. The springs are a hell of a lot stronger than the Kim-Pro, crap mags I got rid of for sure. My experience is if a 47D won't run in your 1911.... its usually your 1911, not the 47D. Their are exceptions to the rule, that goes without saying but 47D's are solid mags. |
|
The "best" 1911 magazines are the omes that work best in your particular pistol.
For me it's Chip McCormick Power Mags; for the next guy, who knows? I think it's BS that manufacturers get away with shipping guns with "factory" magazines that don't run 100% in the guns they ship them with. |











