Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
1/15/2010 7:22:50 PM EDT
Anyone loading 115 grain bullets for your 380 Autos
1/16/2010 1:11:13 PM EDT
[#1]
I would also like to have a heavier bullet but I am to nervous as I wouldn't want to end up compressing the load. there is little capacity as it is with a 95 gr bullet. I am sure someone has I wouldn't.
1/16/2010 4:47:59 PM EDT
[#2]
Keep in mind blow back actions typically are more load sensitive by nature.
1/16/2010 8:06:47 PM EDT
[#3]
Not 115 grain but this is probably the next best thing.

Buffalo Bore 100 grain hardcast
1/16/2010 9:01:36 PM EDT
[#4]
loaded 100 rounds for hornady 115 grain RN FMJ for my ruger lcp and it made my gun a jam-o-matic..... would not feed unless i hand feed the rounds...... my loads were mild......so back down to 95 grains.....
1/16/2010 9:37:06 PM EDT
[#5]
I actually load a 120gr in my 380acp loads.

Used in Steel guns only like Colt government, Makarov, Walther PPK \ PPK/S - and my fav - Military Armament Corp. Model M11

I use Magma Engineerings 09-122 FP BB molds.

No I won't post load data as it is very specific and I re-chrono the loads with each new lot of powder just to be sure.

Be Safe!
1/17/2010 6:17:28 PM EDT
[#6]
Unless you're willing to do the kind of in depth load development that ProfGAB101 has done, you really can't load 115gr in 380.  Not enough powder capacity to get reasonable velocity if seated deep enough for feeding, and if seated long, won't feed in most 380s.

If you're going to use 380 for self defense, use 95gr FMJ.
1/18/2010 11:09:34 AM EDT
[#7]
I just bought a box of ULTRAMAX 380acp loaded with 115 grain LRN  (remanufactured ammo)
1/18/2010 1:26:45 PM EDT
[#8]
you can go with a heavier lead bullet vs a jacketed bullet because lead keeps the pressures low and a lead bullet is shorter than an equivalent weight jacketed bullet.

1/19/2010 6:52:43 PM EDT
[#9]
.380acp vrs 9x19 (aka 9mm para, Luger ect.)

Virtually all 9x19 guns use a locked breach or some form of delayed blow back action. This allows use of slower burning powders which won't pressure spike on the same curve that many faster powders would with the same case volume and bullet weight combos.

Most 380acp (aka 9mm Kruz, 9x17 ect.) use a straight blowback action. 380 brass has much thinner case head construction. Using heavy bullets with slower powders changes the timing dynamics of the firearm action such that the slide will have all ready begun to move 1-1.5 mm (.04"-.06") before the pressure has dropped and now a thinner part of the case head/side is now unsupported by the chamber. This is even more an issue in the area around the feed ramp.

All retail boxed ammo must be made to function safely in any modern firearm specifically made to fire that cartridge. The ammo mfg. will not know if your firearm has a weakly supported chamber or a robust one.

Reloaders can match optimal loads to each firearm.

One old dirty trick was to cut down 223 rem brass and trim to 380 OAL specs, then ream the inside only deep enough to accept the seated bullet. Many firearms in 380 have loose enough chambers that reaming might not be required. The case head and wall of rifle brass is significantly heavier... a much stronger case, but it brings other problems. This extra brass is taking up case volume. So again you need to do some careful load testing before running off a whole lot.

Do your testing at 1/10 grain steps and start about 2/10ths below the minimun starting load when using converted rifle brass. Be SAFE, don't upgrade your handgun to a hand grenade.
1/29/2010 7:39:21 PM EDT
[#10]
Sierra lists their 115 Gr FMJ & JHP at up to 850 fps…

OAL is 0.984 which is the max for this cartridge.

I have never tried the 115 but my 105 Gr LSWC work without a problem.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In