Probably a dumb question on my part but I wanted to see which mount y'all thought was better.

ML3- 2 moa

Micro H1- 4 moa.

Both will have larue mounts and both will be about the same price with mounts included (friend deal)  I know the Micro is more expensive so you would think the quality is better unless you are just paying for the compact and lighter weight.  Again, I am interested in hear your feedback/experience with these models.

Thanks in advance

H1 is just smaller / lighter, you're paying for that more than anything else.  I wouldn't say it's built better or tougher than a CompM series scope, just a lot smaller.

I had the 2 moa dot and unless you just want that 300 yard precision I would suggest the 4 moa in either that you buy.  My 2 cents

Both are excellent quality. You're paying extra for reduction in size and weight of the Micro. I have both and prefer the Micro. FWIW, the Micro's dot is closer to 3 MOA than 4.