User Panel
Posted: 9/10/2005 5:05:59 AM EDT
I'm posting this for the folks that are not members of the VCDL (but should be).
|
|
|
This action by the City of New Orleans is indeed terribly disturbing and warrants both our concern and action, but I would submit that poorly written irrational rhetoric filled with sophomoric outrage and name calling is counterproductive. Kneejerk reactions like this only further serve the notion that we are a bunch of "Gun Nuts." What might be considered a more dangerous threat by much of our society, me included, than an armed zealot who is prone to fury? I would suggest the VCDL membership consider appointing a more polished spokesperson, among other things. The suggested message to our Senators is embarassing, at best. I'd wager with great certainly that most of us are capable of crafting our own thoughts in a much more cogent manner, and without all of the speculation. And for what it's worth, I sincerely doubt that Senator Warner gives a tinkers damn what you or I think about this or any other matter. All of that aside, we should certainly voice our concerns, jointly and individually, and work towards having those voices heard. IMHO, YMMV |
|
I'm learning the Constitution only applies when times are good. When the gov't has a serious challenge to deal with (i.e. terrorism, natural disaster) it can make new rules in order to better protect it's
|
|
Mr. Van Cleave said it rather WELL IMO, and we are fortunate to have him. Strong actions call for strong words. |
|
|
|
|
|
No I'm not a member of the VCDL, and I've no plan to join. I don't look good in fatigues anymore either, though I did cut quite the dashing figure back in the day... To the other posters: I've no issue with the VCDL mission as I understand it, simply the approach they have chosen to address this issue. My point was and remains that there is no reason to foresake civility or to armchair quarterback this situation. I subscribe to the perhaps trite notion that it's best to keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, as the debate goes not to the loudest but to the best prepared. I saw no strong words, rather, I envisioned a child holding his breath in hopes someone would notice. The outrage card is too often played by those we generally find ourselves in disagreement with - like Kennedy, Sharpton and their ilk. They too are an embarassment. Tell me if you you see that any differently... TIA, again, YMMV... |
|
|
Yes I do see that differently. Okay so what WOULD you do? I hear alot of naysaying from you about the premiere grassroots gunrights organization in our Commonwealth. Where is YOUR letter to our congresscritters? Who did YOU call to ask for accountability? Don't like the way the VCDL runs things? Then join up and change it, because by sitting on the sidelines and throwing spitballs you are part of the problem, not the solution. |
||
|
This guy can't be serious? |
||
|
Are you confusing the VCDL with the VDF? While the VCDL maybe a bit more hardcore than the NRA, I wouldn't consider them to be extreme. They have done a lot for the gunowners of this state, and I think we should all be thankful that a group like them exist. I'm sure the gun rights in this state would be far worse without them. |
||
|
Just because he doesn't agree with us, doesn't mean that we shouldn't act civily. Take this opportunity to educate him on the VCDL and what they have to offer. |
|
|
Amen |
|||
|
Thank you. Frankly, you have hit my premise right on the head. Actually, I don't disagree with the fundamentals behind the issue, again, I simply disagree with the way the organization chose to phrase their response. I appreciate your insight... |
||
|
Perhaps the poster(s) and others,would like to check out the website--WWW.VCDL.org. I have not seen any photos from the activities of anyone from VCDL wearing fatigues or even much camo. That would be a bit extreme for me also. I do usually carry a pistol. Remember, if you don't vote don't bi uh, er complain |
||
|
Sorry - I'm not much of a joiner, and again, you have read my message wrong, but then we've already been over that topic. As to your question regarding my thoughts, my words and my actions, personally, I find this more appropriate: Dear Senator Allen: As you must know, despite the denial that a state of Marshall Law exists, the civil authorities in New Orleans, Louisiana have reportedly undertaken to forcibly disarm their law abiding residents. Further, it is my understanding that Federal and perhaps even foreign government entities have been enlisted to assist the City in this mission. This extreme measure shakes the very foundation our Democracy, and conjures comparisons to the police states that we as a nation deplore. I would ask that you and every member of Congress publicly denounce this action, and as a body, take the necessary steps to immediately restore the inalienable rights granted to every American citizen. Thank you for your service to this great nation and to the Commonwealth, and for your immediate attention to this important matter. Very truly yours, XXXX XXXXXX Again, YMMV |
|||
|
Several hundred years ago, there was another group of folks who were labeled "zealots" for resisting their government's taxation practices. Today we have them to thank for all our freedoms. Samuel Adams used the same sort of fiery rhetoric to rally people to his cause. I think Mr. Van Cleave highlights a very important point here. It didn't take much for the local government to strip innocent American citizens of their civil rights. What's worse is that the Federal government is now complicit in enforcing this egregious act. What's to say this doesn't happen in our area? If we don't show our outrage now, then we are silently compromising our own rights should this sort of event ever happen in our area. This confiscation establishes a precedent and if it is not strongly defeated now, then it just emboldens those who seek to destroy the 2nd Amendment to do it again and again every time they see an opportune moment. |
|
|
Oh, I thought he was just screwing around and trolling...I take it he's serious? I have a hard time believing that someone who tries to articulate himself so well would judge a group of people as fatigues wearers and be so quick to insult us because we are members of the VCDL, which he seems to know so little about. Seems like a hypocritical thing to do, that’s all. He can disagree all he wants but when he started slinging insults he lost all creditability. |
||
|
Here is what I sent to Senator Allen:
My letter to Senator Warner excluded the part about "staunch defender of our Second Amendment rights" for obvious reasons. |
|
|
If you were being serious in your previous post then I apologize for thinking you were trolling. However, I find it odd that you express yourself in an articulate manor yet stereotype the VCDL and it's members. Would you care to explain how you came to the conclusion that we all wear fatigues, why you think the VCDL forsakes civility and why you think the VCDL is just an armchair quarterback? Something, at some point in time must have given you these impressions. Would you care to share them? |
|||
|
Has anyone received a reply from Allen, Warner or their respective Congressman?
Has anyone actually been able to get a breathing being on the line at any of their field offices. I have e-mailed and called all week (since Wednesday) in respect to the gun confiscation and in reference to the rescue effort since Friday before last. The responce I have received from Allen, Warner and Moran thus far has been.............. (crickets chirping) ............These people seem to be AWOL. However, the LA Goverenors office, and LA Sen. Landrau (sp) are answering their phones and are replying to people who aren't even constituants. Where the hell are the representatives of Virginia? For those considering using snail mail - It ain't gonna work. Might get to their office sometime around 2008 after its been sniffed by every federal official in DC first. |
|
Please spell martial correctly if you're going to write to a senator... |
|
|
Seems like a hypocritical thing to do, that’s all. He can disagree all he wants but when he started slinging insults he lost all creditability. This is why I asked if he was confusing the VCDL and the VDF because the VDF wears camo at the gunshows and stuff. I met quite a few people at the Richmond shows while working the VCDL booth, that sound the same. They are the type person who has be conditioned by the media to think any gun group and it's members are nothing but right wing extremist militia types. Because of this, they refuse to join any RKBA organization out of fear. They are terrified of being labeled a gun nut, or extremist, or zealot. So they won't join any group of gun owners, and they try to make themselves sound moderate or middle of the road. These are types that normally will allow some gun restrictions because they want too compromise in an attempt too look open minded. I've met a lot of people like that up in NY, and NJ. Sadly most of them don't realize they should of spoke up, until it's too late. Now I don't know if VAroadking is really this way or not, but his posts have given me this impression. I learned long ago that you shouldn't get mad or upset by it. Take the time to show this type person that we are all on the same side. We aren't out to overthrow the government, we have families, jobs, and are pretty normal people. |
|
|
Great point Anthony and I apologized and offered him the opportunity to share how he has come to form that opinion/impression. I wasn't mad or upset; I thought someone was just having fun (like we do with Ed) or trolling. Like I said earlier it didn't seem possible that after his well thought out first post he would quickly stereotype and judge individuals based solely on them being a member of a group like the VCDL. I only asked if he was a member so I didn’t expect the insults to come from such a simple question. If he had followed my question up with a simple “no” and the reasons why we could have begun an open discussion but… I'm not aware of this VDF group so I couldn't make that connection, if that turns out to be the case. |
||
|
I have been troubled by what I've read about the N.O. government's confiscation of weapons. The statements attributed to the officials with N.O.P.D are disturbing. I have to ask you, though, what do we really know about N.O.'s actions. Importantly, what are the legal bases for their actions? No right (save, perhaps, the right of females under 18 to have abortions) is absolute. When sufficient grounds exist under limited circumstances, the government can take your property, restrict your movement, and limit your speech. Does anyone question the legitimate safety concerns of federal, state, and local officials and military personnel on-site in N.O.? Does anyone here doubt that the local government in N.O., under the right factual circumstances, need to shut down the city, cordon it off, secure it, and remove any unauthorized persons from the area? Frankly, I don't know if sufficient facts and legal authority exist for N.O. to do the things it has done, but before I went on a crusade against their actions, I would want to find out. The town, at least in most areas, seems uninhabitable. People were, and are, free to leave the city using their own vehicles. I have yet to hear of vehicles on their way out of town being searched and weapons seized. The bottom line here is: Get the facts before launching any attacks on N.O. It will save future embarassment and strengthen your position. I don't think N.O. is legally justified in its actions, but it might be. Until I know, I'm unwilling to move forward with letters and calls to the right officials. Finally, before you ask, I am not a member of VCDL. If you question my support of the Second Amendment, I would be happy to speak with you off-line and I am confident that my efforts in support of the Second Amendment equal those of anyone else on this forum. |
|
|
Here is an interesting article on the likely authority for Louisiana: Heritage Foundation.
And here is Louisiana's statute on emergency preparedness. |
|
Thanks for the thread Marc. I've e-mailed Allen, Warner, and President Bush, but have yet to get any replies. BTW, I am a proud member of VCDL. They are known and respected in the Virginia legislature, and are very, very effective. |
|
varoadking
Phil is a pretty good spokesman in my opinion. When we started NVCDL back in 94 it was guys like you who sat on their hands doing nothing because they said we would never get concealed carry reform passed. We were called us a bunch of loudmouthed radicals from NoVA. Probably true as I am a loud mouth and it was a radical idea that we could turn VA around and pass pro-gun rights bills. If you aren't outraged when they seize guns in New Orleans you probably shouldn't own an evil black rifle. Politicians will pay far more attention to hundreds of scrawled inarticulate communications then they will to a non-existant letter from you. As Edmund Burke stated "‘The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.