Hey folks, correct me if I'm wrong, and understand that I totally respect the culture of the American Indians here.
But...
As far as I know, they are the only people who were conquered by force, and yet, somehow, they were not forced to blend with our people. We gave them land back even though it's american soil. I'm not upset, I'm just a little confused at how we can conquer a people so we can take land, and yet, after the conquest, we didn't really take the land.
Other than that, I think they should pay taxes like every other business, reservation or not. They aren't a separate country, but they are given more rights and better privilages than US citizens.
At the same time, I think CA should make it legal to have casinos without needing them to be run by Indians. If people can't handle thier money, they deserve to lose it.
Understand that my views are generally very right wing. If no one else agrees, I understand.
Rayn
EDIT:
three strikes law...let me get this straight, if it passes,
1. You only get another strike if the crime is violent or serious as opposed to a non-violent felony?
2. Sex-offenders specifically pedophiles would have harsher sentences?
If this is correct, I don't think it's good. It looks like gun legislation, on the good side, harsher punishment for child sex offenders, on the down side, it's harder for someone to get 3 strikes.
this is a gun board, so I'm allowed to make the statement that we have crime trouble not because we let guns roam the streets, but cause we let criminals. punishment for crime should be harsh, that way, people won't want to do it. Holding people ultimately responsible for thier actions seems to be the only real way for people to realize that committing crime is wrong. It's not the gun's fault that person was shot, it was the shooter.
Rayn