Quoted: Just so I'm strait 1. Stamped= multiple sheets pressed together by machine or autohammer 2. Cast= liquid metal poured into prefab shape or mold 3. Milled= machined down from a solid block of medal
Preference for cast or milled? Isn't a milled receiver stronger? Milled is most expensive, right? I do not reload and most likley will not cycle insanely hot ammo through my weapons except maybe my Glock, does it really matter for me. Durability aside of course I am very maticulous in maitanance of my weapons.
Any feedback greatly appreciated
|
there is no milled recivers! only cast and stamped.
origanls are stamped,, but themetal is harder/thicker,
as tothe mags,,, the century G3 clone use's the same reciver that is on the century cetme,, thats why i most cases cetme and 91/G3 mags work. some like one or the other better
the reciver in the cetme g3 clones really doesnt have to be strong ,,its only there to hold the bolt acrrier and such,, it need to be some what rigid tho so it wont flex,,which really only affects accuracy. Its not like other rifles where the reciver ""hold'" the pressure from the rounds charge.
with these rifles make sure you clean,, them serval if not more times before a range trip., century doesnt do the best job of cleaning them out. this will leave you frustrated if every other round you are getting fte's and ftf's..