I have a US ORD semi M60.
From what I can tell, this is what was done to it to make it compliant.
1 - Pistol grip has been moved from its original location, .5" rearward. (even if a full auto op rod would fit, the engagement couldn't occur)
2 - a plate has been welded to the bottom of the receiver to cover the original hole location, and also to prevent a full auto op rod from fitting.
3 - op rod has had the engagement surfaces sheared completely off. A F/A op rod can't fit in the gun at all.
4 - The rear of the bolt has been modified into a striker assembly instead of the standard spring cap. It's as wide as the rails and rides them.
5 - a little bar comes up alongside the pistol grip into the receiver channel, and proceeds through a slot on the rails. This has a notch in it, which engages on the striker mechanism to trip it. This is how the gun is fired. The hook pulls down when the trigger is actuated, and it causes the striker to release against the firing pin.
I don't know how adaptable this is to the 240/58, but perhaps some of the compliance measures make sense for starters.
The gun costs that much not because of the side plate or labor, but principally because of the high excise taxes they have to pay. Almost $1500 of it.
They wouldn't have to pay very much on a side plate and semi parts though
––Fargo007