Quoted: As far as I know it can't be broken down but I may be wrong. Is it the SBR version or the non-SBR one?
119db is very vague as 115gr supersonic will be louder than 147gr subsonic ammo. The key to look at is dB reduction not the final numbers as its 100% dependent of the round being fired.
I have seen(and have a few) 9mm cans that are notably quieter than any of the SRT's that I have shot(including an integrally suppressed 9mm upper.
All suppressors to my experience have the same lifespan whether they be integral, screw on, QD, and end user serviceable.
Where in NM are you?
-TS |
It was on
www.silencerresearch.com/Reviews/9mm_integral_shootout.htm and they used 147g (subsonic) rounds.
What I am looking for, is something that will be similar to shooting an unsuppressed .22LR using CB longs. My Marlin 60 with CB longs is about the same, maybe a bit louder than most pellet air rifles. Ive noticed many of the suppressed .22LR rifles are around 115dB, also similar to an air rifle/paintball gun. Of the 3 integral 9mm's that silenerresearch.com reviews, the one I mentioned above was the only one that came close to that level of quietness.
EDIT:
Oh yea, non-SBR. I think is is part of the reason why I like the integral so much. Fully suppressed (it seems like they tend to be a bit quieter than threaded cans), yet you can retain 16" OAL. There is no unsuppressed data, as they cant be tested that way.
One thing I noticed in a video I just watched, the SRT is not designed to slow a 115/124g bullet down, so they will produce the supersonic crack. I guess if you want subsonic noise levels, the 147g round must be used.
I am in Roswell, so if you ever want to get together and give me a little schooling on the subject in person, I'd be delighted to do so. Just let me know what your favorite flavor of beer is ;)