Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 1/25/2002 12:24:00 AM EDT
If you guys don't mind educating me: What's the difference and what are the benefits and short commings of each?
Link Posted: 1/25/2002 5:17:13 AM EDT
[#1]
Neither one are all that durable although parkerizing is more durable than bluing.  Parkerizing is a good surface for absorption of lubricants.  Of course, most US military firearms are parked, bluing is considered "prettier," it's on most civilian firearms, and its certainly shinier.

Some of the new high-tech finishes such as Black-T are more durable than either of them.
Link Posted: 1/25/2002 5:33:52 AM EDT
[#2]
Both metal finishes essentially create a layer of controlled corrosion on the surface of the metal, thus "sealing" it and preventing further uncontrolled corrosion.  

Both finishes are accomplished with the use of some rather nasty chemicals.

As a rule, modern US military weapons are parkerized.

However, some maintain that the British baked enamel finish is more durable than parkerizing.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top