The AR18/180/180B is a rifle that in all honesty, probably should have been alot "bigger" the first go-around. If you research some of the trials it was entered in, primarily in Brazil and parts of Asia, it performed exceptionally well, better than the M16 in some cases. I think what ultimatly hurt it was the M16 was standardized already while the AR18 was not. If you look at rifles like the Type 89 and other indigenous Asian 5.56 rifles, most are clearly inspired by the AR18. Even the Europeans took inspiration from the AR18, especially the English with the SA80/L85/L86 series.
For the time, it was an outstanding rifle. Now, its a relic. Anything you could do with an AR180 you could do better with a Sig 556 or XCR. 1/12 twist barrels, non standard mags, easily breakable/impossible to replace furniture and lack of parts are all huge down sides IMO. The AR180B might be a more reasonable option, but these too are now defunct and as we all know, its pretty easy to destroy the polymer lower.
I personally don't understand how you came up with just these too options. I realize AR's are a little "boring" but if you get a Colt/LMT/Sabre or a few others, you have a 1st world "milspec" infantry rifle. With the slight exception of the Mk16, the AR is the only way to acheive this goal. The Sig 556 and AR180 aren't going to have the reliability or durability of a Colt carbine. Ask the SAS...
If you want to buy eiether a Sig or AR180 for fun, thats the right reason. As a serious fighting tool, the AR carbine is still king.