Be advised that the hollowpoint bullets do NOT expand; they act just like FMJs do.

Virtually all of the non-FMJ Russian ammo I've seen uses bullets that obviously were designed to be simple to manufacture, with little to no thought or care on how they would actually perform.  In nearly every case, bullet performance is lousy.

Given that the above is true, I'd vote for FMJ, as it tends to feed the best.

-Troy

They make it because people WANT it (more JHP is sold than FMJ in that caliber).  Most buy it *assuming* (wrongly) that, since it has a hollow point, it will expand like a well-designed and constructed hollow point would.  It doesn't.  Others buy it because their range, for whatever reason, bans FMJ ammo, so this gives them a cheap alternative.

Anyway, bullet construction plays a HUGE factor in bullet performance, and the top companies spend tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars designing bullets that can be mass-produced and still perform as intended, and still many of THEM fail.

Wolf ammo is designed to be inexpensive to manufacture, and it is.  But, you trade off performance for that, in several areas.  Nothing wrong with that if you understand the ammo's limitations and your intended use allows for those limitations.  Just understand that you aren't going to get the same performance as you would with a quality domestic bullet.

-Troy