great answer, mattja.
I always wondered why non-Glock owners always felt it necessary to put Glocks down to enhance their own personal preferences in guns; or why Glock owners felt it necessary to put down other brands to "feel better" about their own choice of Glocks. Some Glocks are good; some Glocks are okay, some Glocks are disasters; some (supply whatever brand you wish) are good; some are okay; and some are disasters....and, whether it's Smith-Wesson's sell out to the anti-gun group, Gaston Glock's idiosyncracies and political views,or pro-gun views of Bill Ruger, or Browning's religious views, etc...if you ask advice on anything, you still have to make the choice in buying which gun or ancillary package for it. Stating a personal experience or preference isn't a personal attack on anyone else...just how "we feel" about our gun, choice, etc. Shoot a particular gun, use a particular ammunition, buy some "feature" you want....let us know how you liked it, or what you disliked...<hehe> then stand back and wait...one of us will try to convince you, you are WRONG!! <grin>...ahhhh...like Kant said, "human nature doesn't change much"...however many years have passed in time!
Ruger (Mike)