User Panel
Posted: 12/11/2018 8:44:54 PM EDT
As title says, where the hell are they? Can't remember the last time I saw some at a gun show or LGS. Nor do I see them from the walk-around sellers at gun shows. I've always wanted a .380acp PPK/S in blued but never have found the money and opportunity meeting. I believe I would jump at a .22 version though.
I know there's probably better .380acp options, not that I really even want a .380 since I have a Sig P-938. But ho-lee-shit, how can there not be at least some opportunities for an all-time classic? Is this the case all across America? |
|
I hear ya, I HAD a PPK/S many years ago but sold it. It was before the 380 Ammo became decent so I sold it for a 9mm. I miss it now, it was a very sturdy feeling pistol, great for ccw, I wish I never sold it.
|
|
The values of real Walther/Manurhin made PP series pistols went way up is what happened.
You can thank GunPorker and similar online auction sites for evaporating the existing supply of the older, well made, PP series pistols. |
|
Now that you mention it....I haven't seen one in awhile. I damn near bought one about 5-6 years ago and didn't for whatever reason. They were on display in many LGS but now it's probably been several years since I've seen one. Maybe I'm just not seeing them but I concur, they've seem to have been disappeared. I'd still like to get one at some point, I mean Fox Mulder carried one for backup gun....that counts for something
|
|
PSA was selling the .22 model for something like $250 during one of their sales during the summer.they did not last long and I missed out. I see one or two every couple of months at the local gun show but they are selling for $450ish which seems more then I want to pay for one when I remember them going for $250 just a few months ago.
I dont really look for the 380 model. |
|
The Smith and Wesson models sucked. The originals were kind of ammo sensitive
They are heavy for concealed carry, compared to other guns on the market Plus they are stupid expensive now. |
|
I got rid of mine for same reasons that MBUZICHOMA commented... heavy, way too much recoil (blow back) for a 380 for what I considered practical use...mine wasn't 100 percent with anything but ball ammo... I tried a TPH in .22lr, and it bit me in the web of my hand every time I shot it....
now if I had one engraved... Fat Herman, Happy Birthday, Love Adolph... well that would be different |
|
Like most of the Walther catalog they were never that common in the first place. They sold ok over the years but were never a big mover. Gunbroker has several if you're so inclined.
I have a post recall Smith and it works fine. |
|
I have three. A .32 ACP PP, a .22LR PPK, and a .380 PPK. All Manurhin made, Walther marked guns. They are collector pieces these days.
|
|
Both the PPK/s and the Sig P230 cut my hand to shreds. You should shoot one first before you commit. Both are sexy and well made guns, but I just can't shoot them.
|
|
|
The PPK/S 380 pistols still turn up around here in the $500 range. I'm not a fan of the 380, but the 32s and the old 22s are great to shoot.
|
|
|
I've got a PPKS 380, it's certainly well made but, ammo sensitive, heavy and chews the shit out'a my hand...
sits in the safe |
|
According to this podcast they are re-doing their production under new management in the US, so they'll be out on the market "soon".
|
|
|
|
My youngest son is getting ready to sell his PPK/S .380, why?
The damn value has climbed so high he figures it’s time to sell it. Blue Interarms import Walther with all papers, the box, cleaning rod. It’s literally like it was just unboxed.....a 100% Walther. |
|
|
Quoted:
I have three. A .32 ACP PP, a .22LR PPK, and a .380 PPK. All Manurhin made, Walther marked guns. They are collector pieces these days. View Quote A friend had one years ago in .380 and I thought that little SOB had some sharp recoil. Caught me off guard as I had never shot a blowback gun before. I had just been shooting .44 Mag too with no ill effect but damn if that little mouse gun wasn't pinching the web of my hand. ETA: Haha, kept reading and was answered above. Makes sense that they were designed as .32s originally. |
|
|
I, too, have been dismayed at how they have literally disappeared from the market. I was fortunate enough to pick up a 1953 PP in 7.65 Browning. It's one of my favorite carry guns.
I lightly dressed the rear of the slide and the bottom of the cocking serrations which cured any cutting for me. What a lot of folks call "hammer bite" is misdiagnosed slide cutting. I did the same to my P230 and it worked as well. Damn Walther for not making this gun to this day. |
|
Quoted:
Were they originally designed in .32 or .380? Which of those two do you think is a better "shooter"? A friend had one years ago in .380 and I thought that little SOB had some sharp recoil. Caught me off guard as I had never shot a blowback gun before. I had just been shooting .44 Mag too with no ill effect but damn if that little mouse gun wasn't pinching the web of my hand. ETA: Haha, kept reading and was answered above. Makes sense that they were designed as .32s originally. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have three. A .32 ACP PP, a .22LR PPK, and a .380 PPK. All Manurhin made, Walther marked guns. They are collector pieces these days. A friend had one years ago in .380 and I thought that little SOB had some sharp recoil. Caught me off guard as I had never shot a blowback gun before. I had just been shooting .44 Mag too with no ill effect but damn if that little mouse gun wasn't pinching the web of my hand. ETA: Haha, kept reading and was answered above. Makes sense that they were designed as .32s originally. |
|
Quoted:
It is a family heirloom and has legitimate connections to the CIA. View Quote I got a chance to check out a Star Model B that was used by a “Company Operative” in Vietnam. NO MARKINGS! No manufacturer marked, no serial #, we even threw it on the Magnaflux unit to see if it ever had any..........nope. |
|
Quoted:
No markings? I got a chance to check out a Star Model B that was used by a "Company Operative" in Vietnam. NO MARKINGS! No manufacturer marked, no serial #, we even threw it on the Magnaflux unit to see if it ever had any..........nope. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It is a family heirloom and has legitimate connections to the CIA. I got a chance to check out a Star Model B that was used by a "Company Operative" in Vietnam. NO MARKINGS! No manufacturer marked, no serial #, we even threw it on the Magnaflux unit to see if it ever had any..........nope. CIA repaid him, he carried during his career. Nothing fancy, and we have no papers to prove it. But we are never selling it anyways. |
|
I want one, an yes it's just because Bond.
I have only ever come across .22lr for sale, which I'm not interested in. Would like .32acp, would take a .380. One of the things I haven't been able to figure out yet (other than the seemingly complicated question of who actually made the various versions and which are 'good') is what the difference in the /s is. |
|
I have a ppk/s. It’s a good shooter. It also leaves bloody streaks across the top of my thumb when I shoot it. I don’t shoot it much.
|
|
I also have a pre '68 GCA .22LR PPK and it is a gem of a gun.
|
|
OK, here is the rundown as best as I can remember...
All WW2 and earlier PP series were built by Walther in Zella-Mehlis, in what became East Germany after the war. After the war Germany was not allowed to manufacture arms, so post war production up through some time in the 70s was farmed out to Manurhin in France. Manurhin produced PP series pistols under their own name, and also sent unfinished parts to Walther in Germany where they were then rollmarked, heat treated and finishes were applied and assembled in their new factory in Ulm. Walther started making PP pistols fully on their own again around 1978. Now it gets more complicated, because of the new firearms laws in America, the PPK could not be imported. So, Walther licensed it's US importer Interarms to manufacture pistols in the US to get around this. The US Interarms made pistols were manufactured by Ranger Manufacturing. They made the only PP series pistols to that time to be made from stainless steel. So then Interarms folds after the death of it's founder. PP production in the US stops. and no new ones are sold for some time, until Walther does a deal with Smith & Wesson to be their US Importer, and Smith gets a license to build the PPK/PPKs in the US. Smith decides to "improve" the pistol by adding a long, and ugly, tang to help lessen the slide bite associated with the PP series pistols. Most S&W guns are in 380, very few 32s having been produced. The S&W guns have lots of problems, and were recalled at least once. Walther's agreement with S&W expires, and Walther sets up their own US branch so they now import the German made pistols on their own. Also by now Walther becomes owned by Umarex, and under their corporate umbrella. Several newer pistols that were designed and built by Umarex are branded as Walthers and sold here, much to the dismay of traditional Walther enthusiasts. Among these are the P22, CCP, PK380 and the current PPKs .22. These are the most trouble prone pistols in the current lineup, all are made not in Ulm, but in Arnsberg in Germany. Walther USA decides to bring back the PPK and a many year gestation period gets underway, with many false release dates. Now it seems this version of the PPK will finally be coming to market. The slides will be made in Germany, and the frames will be made here at Walther's plant in Ft. Smith, Arkansas. All Ft. Smith pistols will be in 380. Whew.. OK, here is how most collectors rate the various PP series gun for quality, from best to worst... 1. The early Zella-Mehlis guns, except late WW2 production. Old world, hand finished by craftsman works of art. 2. French PP series made and marketed by Manurhin under their own name. Very high quality, and better external finish than any post war Walther made Pistol. 3.Walther made/finished pistols from the Manurhin era and the ones later made by Walther in Ulm. 4. Interarms Ranger manufactured pistols. If you want stainless, these are the ones to get. 5. The Smith & Wesson made pistols. If you get one that works, fine, if not, good luck. 6. The Umarex PPKs .22s. Pot metal slides, can be finicky depending on brand of ammo, as with the Smith & Walthers, if you get one that works, count yourself among the lucky ones. The Ft. Smith guns are still an unknown. |
|
|
I own a pre-war PP and a WWII production PPK (both in 7.65 of course)
I picked up a Smith&Walther stainless PPK in 7.65 as a shooter, cheap, from a guy who was a 007 fanatic. Mine runs 100%. I have never had a problem with it. I replaced the grips with a nice set of wood that I hand fit so they look seamless. I enjoy shooting this gun as the other two have been retired to safe royalty status. The design itself is a little too heavy and too complicated compared to today's pocket pistol offerings but I do like to take mine out to the range and play James Bond once in a while then go home and enjoy a Vodka Martini (shaken, not stirred) and wait for my super-model/international spy of a Wife to get home so I can pounce! |
|
I bought a S&W PP a number of years ago. Holy hell that giant beavertail beat the crap out of the first joint of my thumb! Sold it off pretty quick.
|
|
Have never shot a ppk or ppk/s.
German Ulm/Do made pp22, pp32, pp380, varied so much not even understandable when I shot them function wise. 22 & 32 work perfect, easy to shoot, accurate beyond being called a liar, but heavy and tiny tiny sights. With a perfect SA trigger pull and a non existent reset feel. 380 exactly the same but mis fed, mis ejected, and dropped its magazines while shooting. Walther America and I wasted the cost of the gun on shipping, free mags, catches, small parts, never fixed it. Finally gave up and junked it selling to a collector with disclosure because it had been featured in a magazine. That’s all it was good for. Being photographed. Something in frame just not cut right. This is when a new one was approaching $1600 with the Mark sky high. I enjoy the small calibers, but would never buy an original again with out shooting first. And the triggers just aren’t appropriate for CCW. No clue what the supposedly Walther made ones are like today. I smell Umarex in there somewhere based on the price. The price says non steel, non aluminum parts????? |
|
Quoted:
OK, here is the rundown as best as I can remember... All WW2 and earlier PP series were built by Walther in Zella-Mehlis, in what became East Germany after the war. After the war Germany was not allowed to manufacture arms, so post war production up through some time in the 70s was farmed out to Manurhin in France. Manurhin produced PP series pistols under their own name, and also sent unfinished parts to Walther in Germany where they were then rollmarked, heat treated and finishes were applied and assembled in their new factory in Ulm. Walther started making PP pistols fully on their own again around 1978. Now it gets more complicated, because of the new firearms laws in America, the PPK could not be imported. So, Walther licensed it's US importer Interarms to manufacture pistols in the US to get around this. The US Interarms made pistols were manufactured by Ranger Manufacturing. They made the only PP series pistols to that time to be made from stainless steel. So then Interarms folds after the death of it's founder. PP production in the US stops. and no new ones are sold for some time, until Walther does a deal with Smith & Wesson to be their US Importer, and Smith gets a license to build the PPK/PPKs in the US. Smith decides to "improve" the pistol by adding a long, and ugly, tang to help lessen the slide bite associated with the PP series pistols. Most S&W guns are in 380, very few 32s having been produced. The S&W guns have lots of problems, and were recalled at least once. Walther's agreement with S&W expires, and Walther sets up their own US branch so they now import the German made pistols on their own. Also by now Walther becomes owned by Umarex, and under their corporate umbrella. Several newer pistols that were designed and built by Umarex are branded as Walthers and sold here, much to the dismay of traditional Walther enthusiasts. Among these are the P22, CCP, PK380 and the current PPKs .22. These are the most trouble prone pistols in the current lineup, all are made not in Ulm, but in Arnsberg in Germany. Walther USA decides to bring back the PPK and a many year gestation period gets underway, with many false release dates. Now it seems this version of the PPK will finally be coming to market. The slides will be made in Germany, and the frames will be made here at Walther's plant in Ft. Smith, Arkansas. All Ft. Smith pistols will be in 380. Whew.. OK, here is how most collectors rate the various PP series gun for quality, from best to worst... 1. The early Zella-Mehlis guns, except late WW2 production. Old world, hand finished by craftsman works of art. 2. French PP series made and marketed by Manurhin under their own name. Very high quality, and better external finish than any post war Walther made Pistol. 3.Walther made/finished pistols from the Manurhin era and the ones later made by Walther in Ulm. 4. Interarms Ranger manufactured pistols. If you want stainless, these are the ones to get. 5. The Smith & Wesson made pistols. If you get one that works, fine, if not, good luck. 6. The Umarex PPKs .22s. Pot metal slides, can be finicky depending on brand of ammo, as with the Smith & Walthers, if you get one that works, count yourself among the lucky ones. The Ft. Smith guns are still an unknown. View Quote |
|
I have a S&W PPK in 380. It had one ejection failure in the first 50 rounds then no problems since. Not sure how many rounds I have through it but probably several thousand. The feed ramps were the main issue with the S&W guns from what I understand. The PPK is an older design that works best with ammo that it was designed to fire. Some modern hollow point stuff has feeding problems if the front of the bullets are too sharp and squared off. The rounder ones tend to work fine.
That said, I had another one before I got this one that did have some issues. They polished the feed ramps for me and it got a lot better but there was still something else that was wrong so they gave me the one I have now as a replacement. So, the S&W models could be a mixed bag. If you get one that is picky you may want to have the ramps cleaned up and polished. I wish I had picked one up in 32 back then too but I didn't. The German ones are probably better but harder to find and more $$. I have no experience with the Interarms version though I remember seeing mixed reviews of those back when I was shopping around for mine. |
|
I liked shooting my Sauer and Sohn 38h much better then the PPK/S a friend had. Much better designed gun IMHO. And my web got shredded after just a couple mags.
|
|
Except for the safety recall, The light firing pin strike problem and the lack of interchangeability with original PPK/s parts.(When the parts dry up you will have a paperweight)
It Smith and Wesson had done it right and made an exact clone I would agree with you. The only thing I liked was the extended tang to get rid of the hammer bite |
|
Quoted:
The Smith and Wesson models sucked. The originals were kind of ammo sensitive They are heavy for concealed carry, compared to other guns on the market Plus they are stupid expensive now. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Other guns on the market included the Makarov and CZ82, which cost far less and filled the demand for such guns. View Quote Gary |
|
Quoted:
I want one, an yes it's just because Bond. One of the things I haven't been able to figure out yet (other than the seemingly complicated question of who actually made the various versions and which are 'good') is what the difference in the /s is. View Quote Lucky Gunner Walther Review My dad has an Interarms-era PPK/s. Never really liked to run once dirty, and the DA was atrocious, but it is still an awesome little gun (like that Range Rover that is a total crap-box but I love them anyway). |
|
Quoted:
Now that you mention it....I haven't seen one in awhile. I damn near bought one about 5-6 years ago and didn't for whatever reason. They were on display in many LGS but now it's probably been several years since I've seen one. Maybe I'm just not seeing them but I concur, they've seem to have been disappeared. I'd still like to get one at some point, I mean Fox Mulder carried one for backup gun....that counts for something View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Other guns on the market included the Makarov and CZ82, which cost far less and filled the demand for such guns. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The Smith and Wesson models sucked. The originals were kind of ammo sensitive They are heavy for concealed carry, compared to other guns on the market Plus they are stupid expensive now. |
|
View Quote |
|
Back in the early 90's I bought a brand new Walther PPKS because I thought it was a cool design. But, after a year I got rid of it just because the .380 caliber is so useless and ineffective. The double action trigger on it was also horrendously long and heavy. The good thing about it was that it was accurate for a short barrel pistol because the barrel, like the H&K P7M13 pistols, is a fixed barrel. It would be a decent pistol if it was chambered in at least 9mm.
|
|
9mm is too hot for the typical small blow back designs, like the PP series. 9mm Makarov is really the upper limit for blow backs.
To get 9x19 to work in a blow back would require a recoil spring that would be too stout for all but pro wrestlers to be able to retract the slide, if you wanted to keep the slide a reasonable size, or you would end up with a Highpoint like brick of a slide to have enough mass to handle the higher pressures of the 9x19. As has been mentioned several times here, the sweet spot for blow backs is 32 acp. |
|
Quoted:
Except for the safety recall, The light firing pin strike problem and the lack of interchangeability with original PPK/s parts.(When the parts dry up you will have a paperweight) It Smith and Wesson had done it right and made an exact clone I would agree with you. The only thing I liked was the extended tang to get rid of the hammer bite View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Smith and Wesson models sucked. It Smith and Wesson had done it right and made an exact clone I would agree with you. The only thing I liked was the extended tang to get rid of the hammer bite |
|
Quoted:
9mm is too hot for the typical small blow back designs, like the PP series. 9mm Makarov is really the upper limit for blow backs. To get 9x19 to work in a blow back would require a recoil spring that would be too stout for all but pro wrestlers to be able to retract the slide, if you wanted to keep the slide a reasonable size, or you would end up with a Highpoint like brick of a slide to have enough mass to handle the higher pressures of the 9x19. As has been mentioned several times here, the sweet spot for blow backs is 32 acp. View Quote |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.