I pretty much have my mind set on one of these scopes with illuminated mil dot and M1 turrets. While the LR/T series are nice scopes, I don't feel the extra size is desireable for me particularly for an AR style rifle. The AR I want to mount it on has a KAC FF long RAS.
Is there any reason to go without the illuminated reticle? I like the idea of having it to aid in low light conditions.
Is there any reason to get the M3 turrets instead? I prefer the lower profile of the M3 but like the finer prescision of the M1.
In the area I live in, most of my shooting is confined to 100 yards max, with occassional access to a 200 yard range.
Also, as much as I like Larue products, what about the ARMS equivalent? I have used ARMS products and have no issues with them either. Does the Larue cantilver put the MR/T too far forward? I recall this was a good solution for the LR/T but don't know if this is good with an MR/T.
TIA