Saturday, March 18, 2006
Yes I understand, I too have had, on the whole, good luck with the GI Issue magazines. With me the issue concerning HK verses GI magazines is that the HK are much more quality built than the GI magazines; and, perhaps the two magazines are addressing different tactical thoughts concerning magazines.
The HK magazine is built with the idea that the magazine is a durable and reusable item, and it is to be used with the same care and diligence as the rifle itself; not dumped on the ground and thrown about, and it will be used repeatedly many times over. Hence its quality of constriction, stamped steel with a machined follower, etc. I think this tactical thought is also reflected in the price of a magazine $50 - $60.
The GI magazine is built with the idea that the magazine is a consumption and disposable item separate from the rifle; it is to be used a few times at best and disposed of; dumping and abandoning it on the ground, throwing it about, etc. Hence its marginal and limited quality of construction. I think this tactical thought is also reflected in the price of a magazine $15 - $20.
I guess the bottom line for me is the magazine is the one of the most important part of the rifle. Many functioning problems can be traced back to the magazine. And I always remember if I do not have a good quality and 100% reliable magazine, well then all I do have is a very awkward and not so useful single shot rifle…not so good!
Take care and good shooting
MP5 Machinenpistole