Quote History Quoted:
This was the first time it broke but only 100-150rd in. I will replace it and see if it was just a fluke. Thanks for the info.
View Quote
I agree that its most likely a fluke (I hope for all of us QC10 guys). Just for your info, I have a QC10 CLT9MM lower that I've run over 500 rounds through (I know its not a lot, but its pretty new). I used an RRA LPK (standard Mil-Spec parts), a Slash 9Q-T buffer and both a Wolff XP spring and a standard carbine spring. I am shooting unsuppressed (suppressor still in jail) and found that the rifle would not cycle with the full 9Q-T weight and XP spring. Keeping the full buffer weight with a standard buffer spring fixed this. Making the buffer lighter (going to the 9Q weight instead of the full 9Q-T weight) with the XP spring also fixed the issue. I elected to stay with the full 9Q-T buffer weight and have a standard carbine buffer spring in it now. No issues at all. It was the worst shooting Remington UMC 147gr ammo, but with the current setup, that ammo cycles fine. I have not had any issues with the bolt catch (knock on wood). Last round hold open works every time now with the buffer/spring setup I have now.
I don't have a way to measure how much space is between the bolt face and catch when I pull the charging handle all the way back, but when I do that, manually holding the bolt catch, the bolt doesn't lock back until I'm at the very end of the charging handle travel. I'm sure there is a little space there, but its sure hard to tell how much. It has to be a very small amount. If you can perceive additional travel of your charging handle after the bolt locks back, you might try that trick of putting a quarter in the buffer tube. If I do that, I cannot get the bolt to lock back at the absolute end of the charging handle travel.