Quote History Quoted:
Rimfire ammo is not as powerful as centerfire so you want less spring pressure on the hammer so it isn't as hard to reset. It has nothing to do with reducing the primer strike, which actually does require less force. Unreliable rimfire ignition is not usually caused by low hammer strike force, it is caused by the primer not being evenly distributed in the rim. If you have too high a force striking the rim, you can pierce it. Or at least weaken it too much, and the pressure blows it open.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I can't speak for SB, but many .22 conversion users will install a weaker hammer spring to get more reliable operation, especially with lower power .22 ammo. I theorize that the combination of the weak hammer spring counter force and the snappy recoil of the .22 is not a friend to hammer pins.
Why would you want a weaker hammer spring for striking rimfire ammo? Seems light strikes are one of the typical causes of malfunctions with .22lr.
Rimfire ammo is not as powerful as centerfire so you want less spring pressure on the hammer so it isn't as hard to reset. It has nothing to do with reducing the primer strike,
which actually does require less force. Unreliable rimfire ignition is not usually caused by low hammer strike force,
it is caused by the primer not being evenly distributed in the rim. If you have too high a force striking the rim, you can pierce it. Or at least weaken it too much, and the pressure blows it open.
H53, those are very valid points, but not the entire story. At one time a heavy strike was the method of
choice, but as ammo makers advance primer/powder, sealing methods, lubricants, coatings, case prep
and packaging, the forces required will go down. Having said that, there are still factors that reduce
primer/powder sensitivity and gun manufacturers take this into account.
Ah yes, if only we lived in an ideal world. But we don't and that sad fact extends to the .22lr cartridge.
In an ideal situation one would need no greater force for reliable ignition in an AR22 than Geissele's excellent
hammer spring. But taking into account - as S&W, Savage, and many others, do - the incredible ability for
moisture to seep past the loose heal crimped bullet and reduce the ignition characteristics of both powder
and primer, a bit more force on the firing pin is a common rimfire design feature. But as you state, not too much force.
Moisture is the single most detrimental factor that causes reduced primer/powder sensitivity in .22lr ammo.
That moisture starts seeping in if the ammo isn't stored in a cool, dry place, which hardly anyone, including LGS's,
do. The ammo sits on a shelf with no more concern for storage other than the room's daily environment.
Modern smokeless powder, such as Hodgedon's Li'l Gun, will last 50 or more years if properly cared for. This powder
has a stabilizer added to it to extend shelf life. Yet, as good as it is, once it is loaded in the cartridge, it now is vulnerable to moisture
which greatly (by as much as 50%) reduces primer sensitivity. Also reducing primer/powder sensitivity are the normal airborne
pollutants found in the air of every home. Annealed cartridge brass is 70% copper, 30% zinc and quickly deteriorates
when exposed to airborne pollutants. These pollutants cause the zinc to break down (dezincification) and that reduces
primer/powder sensitivity also. Keeping in mind your point of splitting the rim, improper storage will cause the brass to
revert to a more brittle state and split. So force is a critical factor.
To get the most out of rimfire ammo, store it in a water resistant, sealed ammo can with fresh dessicant. Don't open the
can needlessly, and if you have a second floor home, that's a great place to keep it as there is less humidity on
second floors. Yeah, yeah, I know old uncle Charlie and Zeb down the road shoot .22lr that was made during WWII. Good
for them, there are always exceptions to every rule, but nevertheless, it's best to properly store ammo.
BTW, H53EXPERT, I'm curious about that screen name. Are you an expert in the CH-53, MH-53, etc.?
Anyway, that's my two cents worth.
Ted