Quoted:
I also understand that the rail is made here, just tired of the ignorance.
View Quote
[b]I’m going to apologize up front but since Stickman called me ignorant I’m going to defend myself and I’m going to offer references for him to follow up on:[/b]
Dude, that was the 80’s and we had a common goal with Pakistan: to keep the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan. Based on your logic I could say, “How quickly people want to forget that Bin Laden was one of our biggest allies against the Soviets while in the 80s”. That’s ridiculous. I guess we were allies with the Islamic Fundamentalist that we used to funnel all the weapons through too, right? Why aren’t they helping now? Should we give them a break because they were our pals in the 80’s? Maybe Bush should say to them, “Go ahead and hide Bin Laden. After all, you were our allies in the 80’s…let’s not forget that”. We used them like they used us but I hardly think we were allies. Don’t be fooled man, just because we had a mutual goal in the 80’s doesn’t mean that they liked us and that they should get some sort of break now.
Now, in 2003 we want a strong, independent, democratic government in Afghanistan but it’s in Pakistan’s best interest to have the Taliban in power. The weaker the government in Afghanistan the better off Pakistan is. As I said before, it was the I.S.I. that put the Taliban in power. President Musharraf may want to help us and he seems to be doing a good job but in Pakistan the Islamic Fundamentalist rule, period. Again, I’ll raise the question: why are our allies in Pakistan allowing Taliban and Al Qaeda freely cross the boarder to conduct raids on US Solders? Musharraf has to walk a fine line or the Islamic Fundamentalist and the I.S.I will crush him.
I recommend the book, “Hunt for Bin Laden” by Robin Moore. It’s offers an incredible look at the war and politics from the solders perspective. Some of the things that are brought to light in that book made me so mad I couldn’t get to sleep. And since you called me ignorant I decided I would offer you more proof. I did a google search for Jane Mayer who seems to have unprecedented access to CIA, FBI & NSA officials and I found two of her most recent articles dated 7-28-2003. There are some other URLs you may find interesting too.
[url]http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030804fa_fact[/url]
[url]http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/?030804on_onlineonly01[/url]
[url]http://www23.brinkster.com/pakterror/article11.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.angelfire.com/al4/terror/pakistan_terrorism.htm[/url]
[url] http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?userid=38JH8JZ2SL&sourceid=00001199496032798236&bfdate=07%2D30%2D2003+10%3A07%3A32&pwb=1&ean=9780374228941[/url]
[url] http://search.barnesandnoble.com/bookSearch/isbnInquiry.asp?sourceid=00001199496032798236&ISBN=0300097603&bfdate=07-30-2003+10:07:32[/url]
Pay particular attention to what Richard Clarke (counter terrorism expert under Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton & Bush Jr.) has to say about how the high-ranking I.S.I. officials helped their “allies” back in 1998! It may just raise your eyebrows. If someone has facts to back up their statements are they ignorant? I can find more sources if you like. Pakistan may be helping us fight the war on terror but they are still one of the biggest supports of terrorism in the world so my original statement stands. Oh yeah, don’t get me started on Saudi Arabia, Sudan or Iran [;)].
I now return you to your regularly scheduled thread. Treetop, I'm looking forward to your fair evaluation. Keep us posted.