User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/27/2006 11:20:57 AM EDT
[#1]
Here's something to get you going...
My Kalifornia-legal fixed-magazine Stag M4gery:  And a close up: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 4:33:55 AM EDT
[#2]
very nice, what kind of handguards are those? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 5:30:51 AM EDT
[#3]
 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 5:53:36 AM EDT
[#4]
 Looks unconvential, but carry it daily and it's what works for me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 6:25:58 AM EDT
[#5]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 7:25:59 AM EDT
[#6]
I would consider getting a good BUIS and losing that carrying handle.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 12:06:10 PM EDT
[#7]
not the only one
what's a better iron site than the carry handle? |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 2:16:04 PM EDT
[#8]
An Arms SLP or a Troy mounted on top ready to deploy. Not to mention this lets you get rid of the carrying handle and put a foregrip there. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 2:59:14 PM EDT
[#9]
I was watching the news the other day and there was a US Soldier carrying a weapon with the handle in the same position. I had to rewind the dvr to take a double take. It must be catching on. I kind of like it. Just my .02 cents.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 3:02:04 PM EDT
[#10]
That is because it gives him a place to put his handle where he won't lose it. I have something to take care of that, it is my house. I would bet the soldier has it with him because he is not issued a proper BUIS.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 3:02:06 PM EDT
[#11]
Troops do it because they are signed for the gear and have to keep it to turn back in. The carry handle has been obsolete for about 10 years now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 4:22:03 PM EDT
[#12]
Whenever EagleArms decides to ship my upper I'll be posting a pic of my Stag M4gery. I have put a Magpul MIAD grip on my lower and have an EOTech 512.A65 sitting in the box just waiting to be mounted onto something.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 4:32:05 PM EDT
[#13]
My Stag M4gery upper(16in., 1/9, chrome-lined flat top), the same deal that I'm sure a lot of us bought, has something abnormal. The upper reciever has M4 cuts but the barrel extension doesn't. Functions fine so far, but I wonder if anyone else has seen this?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 5:23:59 PM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 5:34:00 PM EDT
[#15]
Is that a rifle extension in an upper with M4 feed ramps  If so, does it have any serious reliablility problems?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/28/2006 5:38:26 PM EDT
[#16]
To my untrained eye it is a standard barrel estension in a M4 upper and so far it has no "informal" reliability problems.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2006 6:55:18 PM EDT
[#17]
awesome thanks guys, I think I will survive now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/31/2006 7:47:51 PM EDT
[#18]
I'm amazed as hell that the tip of the projectile does not get caught on that "lip" very interesting.....That's what is always stated by the experts - cant EVER have an M4 upper with a standard barrel extension... |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
