Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Posted: 7/25/2003 7:02:53 AM EDT
I'm thinking of getting one for my JT-Dist based M4gery. I think my particular rifle's gas port is on the high side of the size range, and I want a little better recoil absorbsion from the buffer system.

Anyone use CS springs? What's the skinny?

My understanding is that unlike regular spings, the "force" is constant, as opposed to getting heavier as the spring is compressed.  

I'm looking at these:

www.zediker.com/tubb/images/speedlock/slspringsar15.html
Link Posted: 7/25/2003 2:33:43 PM EDT
[#1]
Throw them in the titanium firing pin and hell fire trigger bin.
GG
Link Posted: 7/25/2003 5:55:26 PM EDT
[#2]
Originally Posted By Gun Guru:
Throw them in the titanium firing pin and hell fire trigger bin.
GG
View Quote


In other words, save your money. You want a lower cyclic rate? Put an M16  bolt carrier in your rifle.  If you're worried about the legality (there is a recurring argument about this on the site[:D]), grind about 3/16 inch off the sear trip surface on the underside.

Weight slows cyclic rate; not springs.
Link Posted: 7/25/2003 6:01:57 PM EDT
[#3]
Or a heavier buffer?
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top