User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/13/2013 12:37:05 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Lancelot]
Let's see your guys M4 SOPMOD Clones, all are welcome here but this is mainly for the Block I and 1.5/PR clones.
Block I 
Barrel: 14.5" M4 1/7 twist (M4 Profile or HB 'SOCOM' Profile) Flash Hider: Standard A2 or KAC NT4 Rail System: KAC M4 RIS/RAS Vertical grips KAC Rail panels: KAC Optics: Aimpoint Comp M/M2 in Wilcox Mount Trijicon ACOG TA01 NSN Trijicon RX01 IR/Visible Lasers: Insight PAQ-4 Insight AN/PEQ-2 Insight AN/PEQ-5 Visible Laser Flashlight: Surefire M951/M952 Rear sight: MaTech Buttstock: Colt Fiberlite Standard M4 SOPMOD Block 1.5/Phase Replacement (PR) Barrel: 14.5" M4 1/7 twist (M4 Profile or HB 'SOCOM' Profile) Flash Hider: Standard A2 or KAC NT4 Rail System: KAC M4 RIS/RAS Vertical grips: Tango down battle grip in tan KAC Grip-Pod Rail panels: Tango Down KAC Optics: Elcan Specter DR SU-230 EOTech SU-231-PEQ (EOTech 553) EOTech SU-231A-PEQ (EOTech EXPS03) ACOG SU-237 (TA01-ECOS) EOTech/Aimpoint 3x magnifiers IR Lasers: Insight AN/PEQ-15/LA-5 Flashlight: Insight M3 (SU-233/PVS) Insight WMX200 Rear sight: KAC 300m KAC 600m MaTech Buttstock: standard M4 SOPMOD Block II (borrowed from M4A1 SOPMOD Block II Thread)  Attached FileBarrel: 14.5" M4 1/7 twist (M4 Profile or HB 'SOCOM' Profile) Flash Hider: Standard A2, KAC NT4, Surefire SF4P (good luck purchasing!) Rail System: DD RIS II in dark earth Vertical grips Tango down battle grip in tan KAC Grip-Pod Rail panels: Tango Down KAC Front sight: KAC flip up in tan Optics: Elcan Specter DR SU-230 EOTech SU-231-PEQ (EOTech 553) EOTech SU-231A-PEQ (EOTech EXPS-3) ACOG SU-237 (TA01-ECOS) EOTech/Aimpoint 3x magnifiers IR Lasers: Insight AN/PEQ-15/LA-5 Flashlight: Insight M3 (SU-233/PVS) Insight WMX200 Surefire Scout M600 Rear sight: KAC 300m KAC 600m MaTech Buttstock: standard M4 SOPMOD Now some reference pictures: Here are mine! (Top) M4 SOPMOD (Block 1) (Middle) M4 SOPMOD (Phase Replacement) (Bottom) M4 SOPMOD Block II Attached FileBlock I (M4 SOPMOD) Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached FilePhased Replacement (Block 1.5) Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/15/2021 11:39:40 PM EDT
[#1]
Got the new upper. Not sure when it was made. Has a ban era bcg which sucks. I’ll swap that out later. Barrel is dated to June 2003. Besides being a bit dirty this thing looks brand new.
 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 7:20:53 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Dark_zero_x: Its done. It's very front heavy, but I like it. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/441360/20210615_163929_jpg-1979713.JPG Is your IR laser the ATPIAL-C? If so, how do you like it? I have one on order from TNVC, hope to have it in a couple months. My Block 1 is more or less becoming an MWS when I get this laser on it, but that's no issue since the MWS is pretty much just a modernized Block 1 in many ways. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 7:36:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sanman28]
[#3]
|
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 7:59:06 PM EDT
[#4]
 Getting closer. RAS should be here this week. Need to find a comp m4 for it and either a sf3p or sf4p. Thanks to winniethepooh for the tri rail! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 8:10:53 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CSAKing: https://i.imgur.com/eqcliFJ.jpg Getting closer. RAS should be here this week. Need to find a comp m4 for it and either a sf3p or sf4p. Thanks to winniethepooh for the tri rail! Why not a sfct-556 |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 8:27:49 PM EDT
[#6]
Still working on these but almost.......................Ignore the sling I was just fucking around with attachment
 
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 8:28:58 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: Why not a sfct-556 Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: Originally Posted By CSAKing: https://i.imgur.com/eqcliFJ.jpg Getting closer. RAS should be here this week. Need to find a comp m4 for it and either a sf3p or sf4p. Thanks to winniethepooh for the tri rail! Why not a sfct-556 Will a socom rc2 mount to a sfct-556? If so that’s an option as well |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 9:50:42 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CSAKing: Will a socom rc2 mount to a sfct-556? If so that’s an option as well Yes. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 10:49:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: LsuJon]
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: Why not a sfct-556  if your patient sf4p are going to become allot more available and cheaper. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 11:27:20 PM EDT
[Last Edit: tarheel7734]
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: Cause clone. if your patient sf4p are going to become allot more available and cheaper. Airforce spec ops are using the 212a so why not the sfct as its near identical minus the notch, and no Block 1 uses 3 prong and not many use the 4 prong.  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2021 11:55:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: LsuJon]
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: Airforce spec ops are using the 212a so why not the sfct as its near identical minus the notch, and no Block 1 uses 3 prong and not many use the 4 prong. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/B54A8EFA-B7E3-43E2-A3BA-0A43BE80E4EB_jpe-1945868.JPG Not many block 1.5s use them but plenty have been scene and where posted a few pages back. But, out of the the socom muzzle devices only the sf4p is issued and since them becoming available to the civilian market no longer really an issue of having to substitute them. In the end it's up to OP but w/ the trial rail he has, he's setting himself up for a nice 75th reg block 1.5. However that puts it more in the timeline of m4qd. Sf4p:  Attached File Attached FileRangers w/ YHM Tri Rail:  Attached File Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 12:43:09 AM EDT
[#12]
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 1:44:41 AM EDT
[Last Edit: RichieRich562]
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CSAKing: https://i.imgur.com/eqcliFJ.jpg Getting closer. RAS should be here this week. Need to find a comp m4 for it and either a sf3p or sf4p. Thanks to winniethepooh for the tri rail! sf3p   |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 7:40:44 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: If he's going for afsoc then go for an actual 212a. Not many block 1.5s use them but plenty have been scene and where posted a few pages back. But, out of the the socom muzzle devices only the sf4p is issued and since them becoming available to the civilian market no longer really an issue of having to substitute them. In the end it's up to OP but w/ the trial rail he has, he's setting himself up for a nice 75th reg block 1.5. However that puts it more in the timeline of m4qd. Sf4p: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/70B571C0-45AD-4E27-A9AA-F08700808C0B_jpe-1981207.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/DFA3069D-3E90-4E11-9BD1-7E2E4FAB97EC_jpe-1981208.JPG Rangers w/ YHM Tri Rail: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/7CEDA73B-4362-4646-BD26-2DEB4F621166_jpe-1981210.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/B75CB274-6DE5-40AD-8101-9F66EDA14D71_jpe-1981211.JPG Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: Originally Posted By tarheel7734: Airforce spec ops are using the 212a so why not the sfct as its near identical minus the notch, and no Block 1 uses 3 prong and not many use the 4 prong. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/B54A8EFA-B7E3-43E2-A3BA-0A43BE80E4EB_jpe-1945868.JPG Not many block 1.5s use them but plenty have been scene and where posted a few pages back. But, out of the the socom muzzle devices only the sf4p is issued and since them becoming available to the civilian market no longer really an issue of having to substitute them. In the end it's up to OP but w/ the trial rail he has, he's setting himself up for a nice 75th reg block 1.5. However that puts it more in the timeline of m4qd. Sf4p: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/70B571C0-45AD-4E27-A9AA-F08700808C0B_jpe-1981207.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/DFA3069D-3E90-4E11-9BD1-7E2E4FAB97EC_jpe-1981208.JPG Rangers w/ YHM Tri Rail: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/7CEDA73B-4362-4646-BD26-2DEB4F621166_jpe-1981210.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/316069/B75CB274-6DE5-40AD-8101-9F66EDA14D71_jpe-1981211.JPG Yeah, Ranger 1.5 with M4QD with that rail and barrel but he said he's going to use a CompM4 so that's more of an MWS... |
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 4:44:13 PM EDT
[#15]
Are brownells a1 lowers g2g for a block 1 or 1.5 clone
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 4:49:16 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CSAKing: Are brownells a1 lowers g2g for a block 1 or 1.5 clone No, you want an "A2" lower. |
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 7:23:42 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: No, you want an "A2" lower. Well shit. What would be an acceptable no. Colt a2 lower |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 7:41:35 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CSAKing: Well shit. What would be an acceptable no. Colt a2 lower I don't personally care much about it but the currently available ones are mostly marked CARBINE and have SAFE FIRE markings. I think they are going to start coming with selector stops soon. There are some around marked M4 CARBINE ($), M4A1 CARBINE ($$), and PROPERTY OF U.S. GOVT. M4A1 CARBINE ($$$). They don't have selector stops anyway. I think PSA lowers with minimal markings look pretty good to be honest with you. Any A2 profile with black anodizing and nothing crazy looking like pictograms or color filled spiders is fine by my book. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 8:12:28 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: I don't personally care much about it but the currently available ones are mostly marked CARBINE and have SAFE FIRE markings. I think they are going to start coming with selector stops soon. There are some around marked M4 CARBINE ($), M4A1 CARBINE ($$), and PROPERTY OF U.S. GOVT. M4A1 CARBINE ($$$). They don't have selector stops anyway. I think PSA lowers with minimal markings look pretty good to be honest with you. Any A2 profile with black anodizing and nothing crazy looking like pictograms or color filled spiders is fine by my book. I like the psa property of us gov stripped lowers a lot. They were a great price, but not so much anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 8:21:45 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: I like the psa property of us gov stripped lowers a lot. They were a great price, but not so much anymore. |
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 8:26:19 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: I like the psa property of us gov stripped lowers a lot. They were a great price, but not so much anymore. Just happened to look and there on sale for Father’s Day for 99.99. Just ordered 3. Damn you clone threads making me spend more money than I need to. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 9:34:44 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LsuJon: I just wish the brownells $350 complete colt lowers would make a come back. I just wish I'd have put a few more in the safe when the getting was good.  At $219 w/coupon I obviously had my head up my ass....... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 10:06:45 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CSAKing: Just happened to look and there on sale for Father’s Day for 99.99. Just ordered 3. Damn you clone threads making me spend more money than I need to. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CSAKing: Originally Posted By tarheel7734: I like the psa property of us gov stripped lowers a lot. They were a great price, but not so much anymore. Just happened to look and there on sale for Father’s Day for 99.99. Just ordered 3. Damn you clone threads making me spend more money than I need to. Which ones are these? Regular or M4 Burst lowers? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 10:17:35 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Which ones are these? Regular or M4 Burst lowers? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By CSAKing: Originally Posted By tarheel7734: I like the psa property of us gov stripped lowers a lot. They were a great price, but not so much anymore. Just happened to look and there on sale for Father’s Day for 99.99. Just ordered 3. Damn you clone threads making me spend more money than I need to. Which ones are these? Regular or M4 Burst lowers? $99.99 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/17/2021 10:53:45 PM EDT
[#25]
Do you guys have a picture of the fire control pocket on the newer PSA lowers? Are they low shelf?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 4:47:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: New2AR15s]
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryOriginally Posted By Tigwelder1971: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By CSAKing: Originally Posted By tarheel7734: I like the psa property of us gov stripped lowers a lot. They were a great price, but not so much anymore. Just happened to look and there on sale for Father’s Day for 99.99. Just ordered 3. Damn you clone threads making me spend more money than I need to. Which ones are these? Regular or M4 Burst lowers? $99.99 Are the M4 considered close enough? With the Burst instead of M4A1 AUTO? Would any early SOPMODS have been built on an M4 lower? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 4:59:19 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Are the M4 considered close enough? With the Burst instead of M4A1 AUTO? Would any early SOPMODS have been built on an M4 lower? From a technical aspect, all SOPMOD carbines were/are based on the M4A1. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 5:03:18 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Are the M4 considered close enough? With the Burst instead of M4A1 AUTO? Would any early SOPMODS have been built on an M4 lower? SOF guns are M4A1s. PSA didn't make them for the Govt. anyway so does it really matter? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 6:09:25 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: SOF guns are M4A1s. PSA didn't make them for the Govt. anyway so does it really matter? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Are the M4 considered close enough? With the Burst instead of M4A1 AUTO? Would any early SOPMODS have been built on an M4 lower? SOF guns are M4A1s. PSA didn't make them for the Govt. anyway so does it really matter? No it doesnt. And Im not trying to give anyone grief even though my question may have come off that way. Just wondering if a Burst mark lower is reasonable since Ive been trying to track down the M4A1 PSA and having little luck. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 6:15:05 PM EDT
[Last Edit: tarheel7734]
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: No it doesnt. And Im not trying to give anyone grief even though my question may have come off that way. Just wondering if a Burst mark lower is reasonable since Ive been trying to track down the M4A1 PSA and having little luck. First m4 I was issued around 97 or 98 was a burst rifle with kac ris and m68, paq4, surefire 6p, and car stock. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 6:30:35 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: No it doesnt. And Im not trying to give anyone grief even though my question may have come off that way. Just wondering if a Burst mark lower is reasonable since Ive been trying to track down the M4A1 PSA and having little luck. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Are the M4 considered close enough? With the Burst instead of M4A1 AUTO? Would any early SOPMODS have been built on an M4 lower? SOF guns are M4A1s. PSA didn't make them for the Govt. anyway so does it really matter? No it doesnt. And Im not trying to give anyone grief even though my question may have come off that way. Just wondering if a Burst mark lower is reasonable since Ive been trying to track down the M4A1 PSA and having little luck. Yes, M4A1 is correct for a Block I and a newer MWS as well. I was just trying to say that it isn't something to get hung up on since that's the 1 part you can't really get right anyway. Colt U.S. PROPERTY M4A1s are probably $1,000 (and aren't really correct anyway with FIRE and no selector stops) and it seems the PSAs are sold out. I would just go with the PSA Stealth and then it won't matter if it says M4 and BURST on a Block I or whatever else it isn't correct on. You know? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 9:05:09 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: Yes, M4A1 is correct for a Block I and a newer MWS as well. I was just trying to say that it isn't something to get hung up on since that's the 1 part you can't really get right anyway. Colt U.S. PROPERTY M4A1s are probably $1,000 (and aren't really correct anyway with FIRE and no selector stops) and it seems the PSAs are sold out. I would just go with the PSA Stealth and then it won't matter if it says M4 and BURST on a Block I or whatever else it isn't correct on. You know? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Are the M4 considered close enough? With the Burst instead of M4A1 AUTO? Would any early SOPMODS have been built on an M4 lower? SOF guns are M4A1s. PSA didn't make them for the Govt. anyway so does it really matter? No it doesnt. And Im not trying to give anyone grief even though my question may have come off that way. Just wondering if a Burst mark lower is reasonable since Ive been trying to track down the M4A1 PSA and having little luck. Yes, M4A1 is correct for a Block I and a newer MWS as well. I was just trying to say that it isn't something to get hung up on since that's the 1 part you can't really get right anyway. Colt U.S. PROPERTY M4A1s are probably $1,000 (and aren't really correct anyway with FIRE and no selector stops) and it seems the PSAs are sold out. I would just go with the PSA Stealth and then it won't matter if it says M4 and BURST on a Block I or whatever else it isn't correct on. You know? Yup makes sense. Ive read through most of the thread while collecting my parts so far. This one is definitely more accepting of the available parts vs what is "correct". Some of the other threads are wayyyyyy too serious for my budget 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/18/2021 9:43:10 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pezboytate: Do you guys have a picture of the fire control pocket on the newer PSA lowers? Are they low shelf? This is from a M16A4 bought a few months ago 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/19/2021 8:16:32 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Yup makes sense. Ive read through most of the thread while collecting my parts so far. This one is definitely more accepting of the available parts vs what is "correct". Some of the other threads are wayyyyyy too serious for my budget Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By pezboytate: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Are the M4 considered close enough? With the Burst instead of M4A1 AUTO? Would any early SOPMODS have been built on an M4 lower? SOF guns are M4A1s. PSA didn't make them for the Govt. anyway so does it really matter? No it doesnt. And Im not trying to give anyone grief even though my question may have come off that way. Just wondering if a Burst mark lower is reasonable since Ive been trying to track down the M4A1 PSA and having little luck. Yes, M4A1 is correct for a Block I and a newer MWS as well. I was just trying to say that it isn't something to get hung up on since that's the 1 part you can't really get right anyway. Colt U.S. PROPERTY M4A1s are probably $1,000 (and aren't really correct anyway with FIRE and no selector stops) and it seems the PSAs are sold out. I would just go with the PSA Stealth and then it won't matter if it says M4 and BURST on a Block I or whatever else it isn't correct on. You know? Yup makes sense. Ive read through most of the thread while collecting my parts so far. This one is definitely more accepting of the available parts vs what is "correct". Some of the other threads are wayyyyyy too serious for my budget I'm going to act like I'm not the guy that kicked off the last fight in here about whether these are Block I clones, MWS clones, or just kind of clones 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/20/2021 8:59:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AWHAILYEAH]
[#35]
So I have an ADM QD mount on my MRE rifle with a TA31 but just ordered a TA01NSN which mount do I really want?
ETA: Fuck it I'm a give the Laroooo a go..... with an Arisaka offset for either a RM06 HRS or DPP FDE |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/21/2021 9:00:40 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GoRebels: So I have an ADM QD mount on my MRE rifle with a TA31 but just ordered a TA01NSN which mount do I really want? ETA: Fuck it I'm a give the Laroooo a go..... with an Arisaka offset for either a RM06 HRS or DPP FDE I’m pretty sure the correct mount for the TA01 would be the TA51. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/21/2021 9:36:55 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Guntoter: I’m pretty sure the correct mount for the TA01 would be the TA51. Well fuck! So factory mount well shit there goes a wasted $60 bucks on a Larue RCO |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/21/2021 9:38:21 AM EDT
[#38]
So adding a RMR mount will remove the buis on the NSN too huh unless I go offset
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/21/2021 12:07:26 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GoRebels: So adding a RMR mount will remove the buis on the NSN too huh unless I go offset Yes |
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 6/21/2021 7:23:58 PM EDT
[#40]
 Ras came today. Had a m600df at the house as well. Now I’m just waiting on PSA lowers to get here before I paint. Now I’m trying to decide on a optic. I was wanting to run an aimpoint m4s but now y’all got me thinking I should really stick to the 75th build and do a elcan or an eotech (553/ xps03). What do y’all think. The only two things non 75th would be a light and suppressor because I’m running a socom rc2 and probably will keep the 600df on it. |
|
|
KHM
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 1:42:54 AM EDT
[#41]
A gift from your govt.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 1:47:42 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryNothing on that really is a is a block one. It has a midwest rail, waffle stock is not correct. Good looking rifle, but doesn't really belong here. |
|
|
|
KHM
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 1:51:42 AM EDT
[Last Edit: AK_operator]
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: Nothing on that really is a is a block one. It has a midwest rail, waffle stock is not correct. Good looking rifle, but doesn't really belong here. Can you tell me what it is? We received a batch of these a few years back from your govt. Being used as my back up duty rifle atm Also that MI handguard was put on after |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 2:00:54 AM EDT
[Last Edit: tarheel7734]
[#44]
Edit
I'll rfer you to page 1. This thred is for sopmod block 1, 1.5, and II and that rifle does not fit into any of those categories. The lower is nothing we use in the military.. |
|
|
|
KHM
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 2:13:57 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By tarheel7734: Edit ah ok my bad, stamped on the other side is Hyperion Legion International. I'll look more into it |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 2:19:55 AM EDT
[Last Edit: tarheel7734]
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AK_operator: ah ok my bad, stamped on the other side is Hyperion Legion International. I'll look more into it They did private gov contract sales to foreign gov and le agencies. They we're based out of Texas. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 4:59:21 AM EDT
[#47]
I’m building a 1.5 on a PSA M4 carbine lower and a BCM 14.5” SOCOM. Should I have my lower engraved to say M4A1 because of the heavier barrel profile? Similar to pic related.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 5:38:22 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By anonhasguns: I’m building a 1.5 on a PSA M4 carbine lower and a BCM 14.5” SOCOM. Should I have my lower engraved to say M4A1 because of the heavier barrel profile? Similar to pic related. https://i.ibb.co/n7sPdwT/46-B44-FB8-A284-4-F8-C-A9-DE-B071-C2-FD8-A63.png I would build it as a M4 MWS. Lots of combat use using that barrel and markings. SOCOM had very few rebuilt M4 receivers. Most of those that I've come acrossed where conventional infantry units assigned as uplift to detachments. What optics are you planning on using? CD |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 1:53:44 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Combat_Diver: I would build it as a M4 MWS. Lots of combat use using that barrel and markings. SOCOM had very few rebuilt M4 receivers. Most of those that I've come acrossed where conventional infantry units assigned as uplift to detachments. What optics are you planning on using? CD What do the lower receiver markings look like for the MWS? Not sure about optics yet. Planning on using either a magnified EXPS-3, Aimpoint comp or going ACOG. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2021 2:01:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: pezboytate]
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By anonhasguns: What do the lower receiver markings look like for the MWS? Not sure about optics yet. Planning on using either a magnified EXPS-3, Aimpoint comp or going ACOG. Like the pictures you posted. Proper optic would be a CompM4, CompM4S, or M150. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File
