Is anyone else reading this? Something's bugging me. What's with the change in writing style? In all of the other books and most of this one, the writing is a straight forward 3rd person perspective (i.e. "Roland said", "Eddie thought", etc.), but in this one it seems like he keeps switching to the role of narrator, using first person pronouns and actually addressing the reader (i.e. "Do you see them as they are? I want you to see them well."). WTF? I know it corresponds with introducing himself into the story. He has made himself a character, so why not allow his commentary? But it bothers me. It seems to cheapen the story. Thanks, Mr. King, but I would have recognized the importance of that moment without being told. It almost seems like filler or an easy out if he was running out of ways to tell the story. Anyone else notice this? I'm not digging it, especially as the story progresses. If he wants to add commentary, do it in the epilogue, but the story should stand on its own, YKWIM?