Quoted:
Ah yes, Toyota. Originally Toyoda, which means "fertile rice paddies". Until last year did not see a net loss since 1938. Produced trucks and other vehicles, some of which may have helped kill your relatives, but lets not dwell on that. May have also taken government subsidies from YOUR government long before GM took a bailout in the way of help by the US in rebuilding Japan's industries and infrastructure. But lets not dwell on that. How about Nissan nee Datsun? Nissan Heavy Industries was a key player in WWII for Japan. It's founder convicted of war crimes. Mitsubishi? Ever hear of the Zero fighter among many others? The list goes on. Suzuki, ect. Ever wonder why any of the histories of these companies start after WWII when most were founded in the 30's? Google them. Not a word said about all of the weapons made in support of an army that killed millions of CIVILIANS in China alone.
But lets not dwell on that. It was 64 years ago. A long time. Surely they've changed. The war is over.
And every time you buy their products they've won.
Historically, the way we handled Japan both pre, during, and post WWII is what America used to be all about. We whupped their ass, then helped them back on their feet. They rewarded us by becoming one of the most technically sound, peace loving, and productive people in the world. The Japanese are an extremely admirable people to me.
As far as buying domestic cars - free market competition buddy. Whoever makes the best car, that appeals to me, and cheapest, wins. Spew your union protectionist propaganda elsewhere, you will find few fanboys here. Want to sell more cars compared to Japan? Make better cars, that are more appealing, cheaper. Build a better product, and cut costs while keeping quality high. The union says "we want MORE MORE MORE, then goes out and tries to guilt and bully people into buying American. FUCKING HA HA HA. Make a better more appealing vehicle cheaper and you won't have to resort to thug tactics.