The Paths of the Environmentalist and Common Sense Never Intersect
I give you the government mandated ending for "cash for clunkers"; run Sodium Silicate through the engine and destroy a perfectly good vehicle.
And with the smoke pouring out of it, it's SO environmentally friendly.
Just take a look for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjBilHH5z2A
What a waste. Had this been thought out properly by a government bureaucrat, a much better solution could have been had. Take those vehicles and trade them for even worse polluters. Think about it. The taxi driver Camaroon, Egypt, Laos, Cambodia, India or pick your favorite underdeveloped, but semi-friendly country rides around in a 40-50 year old carborated Lada, Zim, Zis or Zil which has no emissions controls and pollutes with a pipe right out of the manifold. Orders of magnitude dirtier than any car with OBD II, this could have been a win win for everyone. For didn't Obama state he wanted to improve our image around the world? Didn't environmentalists state they want less pollution? Didn't treehuggers state they want less gasoline used?
Does a fifty year old car use more gasoline than a modern fuel injected engine? Does a fifty year old car give off more pollution than a modern computer controlled car with a catalytic converter? But then again, I guess pollution is local and doesn't affect the whole world, huh? Would trading a ten year old car for a fifty year old car improve our image and standing with many around the world? I thought that's what Obama was all about? We could even keep the real clunkers (Lada, Zim, Zis or Zil) and crush them ourselves for scrap metal.
If it bothers some that we would be helping people around the world instead of our own, well, we do it everyday through USAID and other programs. Moreover, we could collect a fraction of the car's true worth from the foreign buyer and apply it towards our national debt, with the explicit agreement that our ten year old cars could only replace forty to fifty year old cars. If that still bothers some, then give the cars to people in Appalachia who have no hope of ever owning even a true clunker. There could even be a qualification program to make sure it gets to the most needy.
Whatever, I'm fine with it. But I'm not fine with the wasteful program another government statist has setup for destroying perfectly useful vehicles. Why is this administration stuck on stupid?