Quoted: These sand snakes are punks, but they're not stupid. They're not an open, go-as-you-wish society, and tend to be very good at keeping things under the radar, away from prying eyes. |
Given that you are an epert on Iranian culture, why don't you enlighten us:
1) What is the major religion of Iran?
2) What is the language spoken in Iran?
3) What other languages does that language bear resemblance to?
4) What ethnic group comprises the majority of the Iranian population?
The intelligence community was of similar opinions about Iraq in 2002. Analysts like Michael Scheuer spent weeks looking for connections to Al Quaeda and looking for evidence of nuclear biological and chemical weapons. Nothing substantive was found. The DoD and the Executive branch then took what little there was and restated it with the utmost conviction, swaying the public towards war.
The intelligence commnity was surprised by September 11, and failed to accurately predict what would hapen during the war in Iraq (this isn't necessarily because they were wrong; it might also be in large part because they didn't state their views more forcefully and prevent their work from being co opted and reversed). At this point, they may be wrong, but they could also be attempting to get their version out and try to salvage what little reputation they have left.
It isn't unusual for a government to say one thing and mean another, and given that the President of Iran is:
1) Politically unimportant
2) Politically weak
3) Lacking in support from his own people
4) in constant disagreement with the mullahs
it is entirely possible that the majority of the rhetoric we hear from Iran is brought to us by the president and not the mullahs. They aren't acting as a monolithic block.