User Panel
Posted: 12/4/2007 7:16:46 AM EDT
Let's discuss some ideas and their feasibility.
The proposals should be cutting edge, but not "magic" technology. I'll start...An updated Spectre...we could call it the Wraith. Upgrade the armament to gauss cannons/coil guns and directed energy weapons. The military is very close to acheiving a battlefield deployable laser, so lets give it something to ride in. |
|
The Wraith? Does it beam enemy into itself then suck out their life force?
Seriously though, battlefield lasers are under development for defensive purposes, mostly---shooting down missiles, aircraft, etc... We're still pretty fucking far away from a laser efficient enough that it does the job better than an explosive shell or bullet against hardened targets or personell. |
|
I like the idea of a high intensity laser that's man-portable and shoulder fired (when the technology allows for them to be light enough).
No recoil, no external ballistics to think about, and as accurate as you are steady. Of course, maybe bad guys would develop armor made of mirrors or prisms that could deflect or reflect the beam. |
|
Satellite mounted kinetic energy weapons. Basically orbiting tungsten telephone poles, with small engines and guidance system.
It would be some way of causing enormous damage to a single target in a very short amount of time, let's say 20-30 minutes. It would also be better than a non-nuclear ballistic missile, primarily because it would be less likely to trigger launch alerts in other countries, such as Russia or China. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment |
|
Flying Crowbars...I read a Jerry Pournelle article about the THOR system back in the 80s. Always thought it was a great idea. |
|
|
Recoil assisted of course! |
|
|
Honestly i think the greatest improvement the military could use for infantry isn't a weapon. We could use a powered exo-skeleton way more. imagine if we could wear an armored suit that is impervious to small arms up to AP 30=06 rounds, but everywhere. Also, we could carry more and deadlier weapons, arm mounted MK-19 anyone? M240B on my shoulder?
|
|
I think we're going to have to come up with more efficient and powerful fuel cells before we develop usable powered armor. |
|
|
I read somewhere about nuclear cells that provide a steady flow of power (albeit very-very low voltage currently) that's being developed by battery makers like Duracell and Energizer. Once that's perfected, we'll have batteries that will run with a constant draw for years. |
||
|
Agreed. However, could there be a use for powered exoskeletons for supply and armament jobs, like on ships or airfields? That would give us practical experience with powered exoskeletons in the field, and possibly spur development of models more suited to combat. |
||
|
Marines to Pentagon: We need a freaky deaky airborne death ray, stat There's that...what about the gauss cannons I suggested? Workable? |
|
|
Not with present levela of technology. Maybe in a few years, if we can develop high temperature superconductors. |
|
|
Firing nuclear shells. |
|
|
From orbit. |
||
|
We need to get on that -- our military can't be upgraded to "future awesome" without walking robots...! |
||
|
Maybe advances in material sciences that would allow high brisance explosives as propellant, which would lighten loads and allow higher velocities as well.
|
|
|
||
|
Take a C-130 gunship and stick a bunch of these pointing out the side. (It is a box of ground to ground missiles)
A C-5 with a JDAM conveyor belt. |
|
i think that the military should bring back and update an older weapon system for current use. the pack 75mm howitzer is a small, relatively light weight artillery piece that could be towed by a HMMWV and could be used for both indirect and direct fire. with modern technology i'm sure we could make the shells more accurate and lethal, and possibly even make laser-guided shells.
|
|
Like the power loaders from Aliens. Better than a forklift and way cooler looking. I used to think the exoskeleton thing was a cool idea for combat soldiers... until I grew up. Then the reality of them set in. They're just way too impractical unless you make them completely resistant to small arms and things like RPGs and landmines. Otherwise you're just building a hi-tech metal coffin that only fits one person as opposed to several like a track vehicle. If they gave more people common, off the shelf stuff like optics and trained them a hell of a lot more with their weapons than they did in the past and then worked on the logistics system for battlefield resupply things would probably go a little smoother than they did. Beyond that I think we need to wait for a major technological/biological breakthrough to see anything really impressive. |
|||
|
The weight of powered armor will also make it really easy to cornhole armored troops with covered, camouflaged pits along their route of advance. |
||
|
Not if they have multispectral sensors that can see through the camouflage (thermal, millimeter wave radar, IR, visible light, all combined). |
|||
|
For small arms, I think that the biggest improvements will come in the sights. Imagine…
* Fully digital scope with a 100 megapixel resolution. *Zoom from 0.25x to 100x * Built in automatic laser range finder. * Reticle automatically range adjusts based on programmable ammunition type. *Exclusive “homeboy” system compensates for a sideways hold of the weapon. Operator can still hit his target while retaining that unmistakable Liberian combat style. * When in visible light mode, the scope automatically compensates for lighting conditions down to starlight levels. * Thermal mode and near infrared modes for improved target acquisition in all conditions. *Ground penetrating radar mode allows an active search of the area for tunnels or lets the operator see through walls. *Personal IFF compatibility helps prevent annoying friendly fire incidents. *Image recognition software constantly scans constantly scans all available modes for potential threats such as mines, booby traps, or camouflaged snipers and alerts the operator. *Scope image can either be viewed from the rear of the scope as is traditional, exported to a viewer attached to the operators helmet. *Video output allows the scope’s image to be exported and transmitted in real time. *Video inputs allow the scope to also display GPS mapping data, photographs, or text instructions. *Scope’s onboard memory card records 24 hours of data. *DVD compatibility allows operator to view instructional zombie movies during downtime. *Heavy duty backpack included so user can carry the 2,500 page instruction manual with him in the field. |
|
What can a powered exoskeleton do better then what a fork lift can do more cheaply? It is a nice idea fellas but me thinks you have been watching Aliens too many times. There just isn't a need for a system like this. |
|||
|
Rail guns. first on ships, then artillery, then tanks, then crew served weapons, then assault weapons.
|
|
Carry 300 pounds of gear and 200 pounds of weapons cross country at 20 mph with the same agility as a man on foot. In theory anyway. |
||||
|
Were I king instead of working on new gear I'd work on a national set of balls that enabled the troops to go in to a war with the full might and power of the US behind them with no ambiguous bullshit and politicking. I make it a rule that if we sent troops in to harms way the military would make the rules and we'd just sit back here doing whatever we needed to do to make sure our troops kicked ass got the job over with and came home as soon as possible.
We have plenty of fancy gear. If I had to make a piece of gear it would be something robust without pissy lil electronics in it that broke the first time a marine used it. Or radios that could REALLY be depended on to talk to each other and the right to bitch slap the CommO publicly if he screwed up. |
|
With current battery technology that isn't feasible right now. I was specifically referring to the use of (presumably "tethered") exoskeleton system in ware houses, hangers, supply depots, etc. Its a cool idea to have a power loader but It just doesn't offer a drastic leap in performance over forks lifts. And that is assuming exoskeletons would give a performance boost over forklifts. I mean do we even need one? We seem to load our warplanes fast enough today. |
|||||
|
Actually if you'd ever seen our planes loaded with armaments it is a painfully slow process. We would be better off with an improved "jammer" no doubt, but a powered suit wouldn't do much good on aircraft where you only have a few feet of clearance under it. It might be nice for moving loose cargo around but for palletized stuff the forklift is still the right tool for the job, and will be for a long time. There are electric and CNG ones already. |
||||||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.