Alright, here's the story.Back in 2000 I bought this Mossberg shotgun for home defense. I had just moved to NC and I hadn't owned a gun in years (so in a way, it was my first gun...or at least the first one since I started collecting). It was a real nice Mossberg 590 12 gauge with the Marine Cote anti-corrosion finish.
Well, a few years later I had acquired a few more guns and had the makings of a decent collection. My dad kept saying at the time the he was going to get a shotgun once he got some more money and one day I decided to give him my Mossberg 590. A few weeks later we took it out and shot it and didn't enjoy it at all. The 2 3/4" slugs and 2 3/4" buck was still too much for him. So, the gun sat in his closet for the next 3 years.
The next year I got him to take his CHL course in MI and as a birthday gift I paid for his class and took it with him. I gave him a Glock 19 to use for the course and told him he could keep it as long as he wanted (as in here, it's yours). He eventually gave it back to me because he thought it was too big for him to conceal well. He ended up buying a Keltec P3AT that he carried with his CHL in MI.
Well, now that he's moved to Texas he wants to get his Texas CHL. I convinced him that he needed a better gun for this. So, he asked me if I had any guns I'd sell him. I told him that he could have my S&W 908S (a good little SS 9mm), but that he'd have to trade me the Mossberg shotgun for it. He enthusiastically agreed and so it was done.
I mentioned this to someone else and they thought it was kind of crappy of me to make my dad trade me for the pistol. He thought I should have either given my dad the gun or sold it to him and let him keep the Mossberg, but that I was "indian giving" on the shotgun. I don't see it that way. What do y'all think?